Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 08:41 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 08:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions
User avatar
chiccufrazer1
Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Last visit: 10 Dec 2013
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 64
Kudos: 84
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jumsumtak
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Last visit: 14 Jun 2023
Posts: 1,092
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 479
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
Posts: 1,092
Kudos: 594
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MacFauz
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Last visit: 19 Mar 2022
Posts: 990
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 28 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,447
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,447
Kudos: 79,436
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chiccufrazer1
Statements :
1. All women are mothers.
2. All mothers are sisters.
Conclusions :
1. All women are sisters.
2. Some women are not
sisters.
Since both the premises
are affirmative, the
conclusion must be
affirmative. So, conclusion
2 cannot follow.

hi guys this is a syllogism question i copied from indiabix..i just wanted to know why conclusion 2 does not follow..if we take conclusion 1 as a convertend then conclusion 1 would gives us the following converse;some women are mothers..now,my question lies on the fact that if some women are mothers then the arguement that some women are not mothers would also be true according to the contrary rule(which states that if one of the two contraries is true then the other is also true)on the tradition square of opposition..i need your replies please

Posted from my mobile device

I don't know which book you are following to get your concepts straight but it is certainly not working out. I am not sure where the fault lies.

'All women are mothers' implies 'some women are mothers' - Correct
'Some women are mothers' implies 'some women are not mothers' - Incorrect

'Some' is a case of partial information. You only know about some women. You don't know about the others. In a class, say, there are 10 students. I ask only 3 of them - 'Are you from Michigan?' All three say 'Yes'. I can now say that 'some of you are from Michigan'. The point is - I don't know about the rest.. It is possible that they are from Michigan too. It is possible that some of them are not from Michigan. I don't know. Hence, 'some people are' does not imply 'some are not'.