Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:53 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,389
Own Kudos:
778,288
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,389
Kudos: 778,288
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
exc4libur
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 1,684
Own Kudos:
1,447
 [2]
Given Kudos: 607
Location: United States
Posts: 1,684
Kudos: 1,447
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SudhanshuC
Joined: 11 Nov 2024
Last visit: 03 Dec 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Location: Canada
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q82 V77 DI80
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q82 V77 DI80
Posts: 44
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
flyhigh99
Joined: 26 Nov 2024
Last visit: 19 Aug 2025
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
9
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Concentration: Technology, Finance
WE:Operations (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Posts: 4
Kudos: 9
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
is E trying to say that those who have better resources are the ones that can manage to volunteer or does it mean that if someone already has the resources (& a good well-being) then they wouldn't volunteer? Language and intention is confusing me
User avatar
Ann-Mary
Joined: 07 Mar 2024
Last visit: 19 May 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone pls explain. The way its written is sooo confusing
User avatar
shaun97
Joined: 03 Nov 2024
Last visit: 29 Jul 2025
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 161
Posts: 6
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ann-Mary
Can someone pls explain. The way its written is sooo confusing
Newsletter for community-center volunteers: Retired persons who regularly volunteer their time to help others generally display fewer and milder effects of aging than their nonvolunteering contemporaries: in social resources, mental outlook, physical health, economic resources, and overall functioning, they are found to be substantially stronger than nonvolunteers. Volunteering is often described as doing good works to improve the lives of others. How good to know that there is evidence that it can equally benefit your own well-being!

Let's extract the required information :
1. Premise : People who regularly volunteer display less signs (than non-volunteers) of aging in social resources, mental outlook, physical health, economic resources, and overall functioning.
2. Inference drawn : Volunteering in some way(milder aging) benefits the volunteer as well.

We are required to find a reason why inference drawn is unwarranted.

Pre-Thinking : Author's drawn inference : volunteering -> less aging

What if ? less aging -> volunteering ? (people with lesser aging are the ones who can volunteer as they have money, energy etc.) This will undermine the inference drawn.

Clearly, answer E goes along the lines of this pre-thinking.
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,284
Own Kudos:
785
 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Products:
Posts: 1,284
Kudos: 785
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer matches the argument as highlighted below. For the specific question you have, it's the former. The idea is to explain why the conclusion isn't right, so it doesn't make sense to think volunteering can benefit well being when people are already better

Newsletter for community-center volunteers: Retired persons who regularly volunteer their time to help others generally display fewer and milder effects of aging than their nonvolunteering contemporaries: in social resources, mental outlook, physical health, economic resources, and overall functioning, they are found to be substantially stronger than nonvolunteers. Volunteering is often described as doing good works to improve the lives of others. How good to know that there is evidence that it can equally benefit your own well-being!

The inference drawn above is unwarranted because


(A) the center has a self-interested motive to attract new volunteers

(B) it interprets “well-being” as including the factors of social and economic resources, mental outlook, physical health, and overall functioning

(C) some of those who do not volunteer might be older than some volunteers and so could not be considered their peers

(D) growing older might not necessarily result in a change in mental outlook

(E) those with better resources, health, outlook, and functioning are more able to work as volunteers

flyhigh99
is E trying to say that those who have better resources are the ones that can manage to volunteer or does it mean that if someone already has the resources (& a good well-being) then they wouldn't volunteer? Language and intention is confusing me
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,284
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Products:
Posts: 1,284
Kudos: 785
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Think of it this way(using a simple analogy). Someone is saying X got fit. how do you refute it? You say, cmon, X were already fit
Ann-Mary
Can someone pls explain. The way its written is sooo confusing
User avatar
rahul5657
Joined: 26 Jul 2023
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 49
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) The center has a self-interested motive to attract new volunteers.
The passage is from a newsletter for volunteers, so the center may indeed want more volunteers.
However, the argument is about whether volunteering improves well-being, not about the center’s motives.
Incorrect.


(B) It interprets “well-being” as including the factors of social and economic resources, mental outlook, physical health, and overall functioning.
The passage defines well-being broadly but does not make an error by doing so.
The problem isn’t in the definition—it’s in assuming that volunteering causes these benefits.
Incorrect.


(C) Some of those who do not volunteer might be older than some volunteers and so could not be considered their peers.
Even if some non-volunteers are older, that does not explain why volunteers seem healthier.
Age difference is not the key issue—the issue is whether volunteering causes better health or if healthier people just tend to volunteer.
Incorrect.


(D) Growing older might not necessarily result in a change in mental outlook.
This does not address the argument’s main flaw.
Even if mental outlook did change with age, the question remains: Did volunteering cause better mental outlook, or were healthier people more likely to volunteer?
Incorrect.


(E) Those with better resources, health, outlook, and functioning are more able to work as volunteers.
This directly weakens the argument.
If healthier, wealthier, and more socially active people are simply more likely to volunteer, then volunteering is not necessarily the cause of their well-being.
Correct...
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts