Last visit was: 17 Jul 2024, 06:24 It is currently 17 Jul 2024, 06:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 695
Own Kudos [?]: 547 [10]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 283
Own Kudos [?]: 498 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 863
Own Kudos [?]: 6908 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 1707 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: CR: Nation [#permalink]
1
Kudos
E for me.......

D states that "The public of India, in existence sine 1948, has a population that speaks hundreds of different, though related, languages"--since the argument already mentions that no nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common language.

So D in other way strengthens the arguments since the languages are relates despite being different.

E is the best answer which weakens the argument.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Status:Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Posts: 1505
Own Kudos [?]: 1132 [2]
Given Kudos: 432
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Re: CR: Nation [#permalink]
1
Kudos
reply2spg wrote:
No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common tongue.


This is the argument of the passage. The remainder of the passage serves as the author's premise. Option E directly challenges the author's assertion.

It has been over a year, yet the OA has not been posted. :(
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Dec 2018
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common to [#permalink]
Option A and option B strengthen the argument.Option C tells us why Canada had problems but it doesn't directly attack the main conclusion i.e. no country can survive unless people have a common tongue. Option D tells us that the languages are related. So it doesn't weaken the conclusion. Option E gives evidence to directly attack the main conclusion. Hence (e).
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Apr 2018
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common to [#permalink]
Amit05 wrote:
pmenon wrote:
No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common tongue. For proof, we need only consider Canada, which is being torn asunder by conflicts between French-speaking Quebec and the other provinces, which are dominated by English speakers.
Which of the following, if true, most effectively challenges the author’s conclusion?

(A) Conflicts over language have led to violent clashes between the Basque-speaking minority in Spain and the Spanish-speaking majority.

(B) Proposals to declare English the official language of the United States have met with resistance from members of Hispanic and other minority groups.

(C) Economic and political differences, along with linguistic ones, have contributed to the provincial conflicts in Canada.

(D) The public of India, in existence sine 1948, has a population that speaks hundreds of different, though related, languages.

(E) Switzerland has survived for nearly a thousand years as a home for speakers of three different languages.

Confused as to why the right answer is actually the right one. Will post the OA after a few replies :-D


Agree with beckee529.

What does author say ?
That NO nation can survive if people don't speak a common language.

Why does the author say so ?
because Canada as conflicts between French and Eng speaking people.

The Questions stems asks us to weaken the authors argument.
2 ways :
a) If we can find another reason for conflicts in Canada.
b) If we can give eg of another country which is surviving in spite of multiple languages.

Lets look at the options :

A - Out of scope.
B - Strengthens
C - Could have right if had not included along with linguistic ones . So in a way strengthens the authors argument.
D - Can't say.. May be India also might be having similar conflicts due to language .. We cannot assume things in GMAT.
E - Correct. Weakens the author properly.

not agrred with u
your reasoning for d goes with e also and youe reasoning for e applies to d also.
if u are nt assuming that "India also might be having similar conflicts due to language", same also applies for swizerland
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
Posts: 641
Own Kudos [?]: 2137 [1]
Given Kudos: 174
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Send PM
Re: No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common to [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Hey SUNILAA,

Welcome to the GMAT Club.

In this case D is not as good an option as E. Few reasons why...

1. The laguanges if India are mentioned as "tough related" which weakens it a bit
2. The argument says - no nation can survive long. India is said to have existed since 1948 which could be around 70 years but E is saying Switzerland has survived for thousands.

In light of these two small differences.. E stands stronger than D. Afterall, in a GMAT question we are looking for the best among the lot.

Hope this helps.

Kind Regards,
Gladi


SUNILAA wrote:
Amit05 wrote:

Agree with beckee529.

What does author say ?
That NO nation can survive if people don't speak a common language.

Why does the author say so ?
because Canada as conflicts between French and Eng speaking people.

The Questions stems asks us to weaken the authors argument.
2 ways :
a) If we can find another reason for conflicts in Canada.
b) If we can give eg of another country which is surviving in spite of multiple languages.

Lets look at the options :

A - Out of scope.
B - Strengthens
C - Could have right if had not included along with linguistic ones . So in a way strengthens the authors argument.
D - Can't say.. May be India also might be having similar conflicts due to language .. We cannot assume things in GMAT.
E - Correct. Weakens the author properly.

not agrred with u
your reasoning for d goes with e also and youe reasoning for e applies to d also.
if u are nt assuming that "India also might be having similar conflicts due to language", same also applies for swizerland


Posted from my mobile device
VP
VP
Joined: 18 Dec 2017
Posts: 1161
Own Kudos [?]: 1046 [1]
Given Kudos: 421
Location: United States (KS)
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Send PM
Re: No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common to [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
pmenon wrote:
No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common tongue. For proof, we need only consider Canada, which is being torn asunder by conflicts between French-speaking Quebec and the other provinces, which are dominated by English speakers.

Which of the following, if true, most effectively challenges the author’s conclusion?


(A) Conflicts over language have led to violent clashes between the Basque-speaking minority in Spain and the Spanish-speaking majority.

(B) Proposals to declare English the official language of the United States have met with resistance from members of Hispanic and other minority groups.

(C) Economic and political differences, along with linguistic ones, have contributed to the provincial conflicts in Canada.

(D) The public of India, in existence sine 1948, has a population that speaks hundreds of different, though related, languages.

(E) Switzerland has survived for nearly a thousand years as a home for speakers of three different languages.


Nice Question.
I was confused between C and E. I fell for C but clearly the OA is E. The author considers only one country. The best weaken will be to provide an example of other country which has survived with different languages.
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17502
Own Kudos [?]: 868 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common to [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: No nation can long survive unless its people are united by a common to [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts