Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago, had society seriously

Question

Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago,  had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute  its citizens.

(A) had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute

(B) did society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute

(C) had society seriously questioned the right of the state for the executing of

(D) did society seriously question the right of the state to execute

(E) had society seriously questioned whether the state had a right that it could execute

LevanKhukhunashvili · Answer

According to my "lame" SC analysis:
"State" should be noun because "it" can refer only to state and this cant happen while we keep "right of the state"

Imo
Ans  E

hiranmay · Answer

Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago, had society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute its citizens.

(A)  had  society seriously questioned the right of the state that it could execute--> timeline is provided, so use of past participle is unnecessary

(B) did society seriously  questioned  the right of the state that it could execute --> "did questioned" is wrong: "did question" <=> "questioned"

(C)  had  society seriously questioned the right of the state for the executing of--> same as A

(D) did society seriously question the right of the state to execute -->  correct

(E)  had  society seriously questioned whether the state had a right that it could execute--> same as A

09173140521 · Answer

this is inversion grammar............... because of negative idiom....  Not until X...did Y 
"had" in this case do not have pair action and incorrect....... obviously D correct

Doer01 · Answer

Hi folks,

Below is how I read the original sentence. Bold things are trigger points. 
 Not until the Enlightenment , some 200 years ago,  had  society  seriously questioned the right of the state that   it   could execute  its citizens.
 Sentence begins with a modifier and it should trigger one to find the entity its modifying.
"Not until the enlightenment"...ok, but whose enlightenment? Whatever follows, must be the subject of the sentence. 
Had society....Ok. So its society. Makes sense. "seriously questioned the right of the state that IT could..." What does IT refer to? Society? State?
we have got a pronoun ambiguity here.

Lets choose the best among five.
 
Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

Use of "Did" demands first form of verb. Second, pronoun ambiguity still exists.

Wrong preposition. For means, society is doing something for where as here its something doe to someone.

Correct usage of did and first form of verb. No pronoun ambiguity.

Too long sentence. I could not find any grammatical error though.

I find D & E both grammatical correct. D is just better than E.

blablabla1997 · Answer

hi folks,

just wondering, if there is no "some 200 years ago", should we keep the (did) or (had)?

ExpertsGlobal5 · Answer

Hello  blablabla1997 ,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your query, no; the removal of this phrase will not affect the tense of the sentence; "did" remains the correct verb.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team

Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago, had society seriously

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Not until the Enlightenment, some 200 years ago, had society seriously

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards