Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
22 Jan 2020, 05:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:40) correct
34%
(01:49)
wrong
based on 601
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Nutritionist: Vitamins synthesized by chemists are exactly the same as vitamins that occur naturally in foods. Therefore, it is a waste of money to pay extra for brands of vitamin pills that are advertised as made of higher-quality ingredients or more natural ingredients than other brands are.
The nutritionist’s advice is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) It is a waste of money for people to supplement their diets with vitamin pills.
(B) Brands of vitamin pills made of natural ingredients always cost more money than brands that contain synthesized vitamins.
(C) All brands of vitamin pills contain some synthesized vitamins.
(D) Some producers of vitamin pills are guilty of false advertising.
(E) There is no nonvitamin ingredient in vitamin pills whose quality makes one brand worth more money than another brand.
The nutritionist’s advice is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) It is a waste of money for people to supplement their diets with vitamin pills.
(B) Brands of vitamin pills made of natural ingredients always cost more money than brands that contain synthesized vitamins.
(C) All brands of vitamin pills contain some synthesized vitamins.
(D) Some producers of vitamin pills are guilty of false advertising.
(E) There is no nonvitamin ingredient in vitamin pills whose quality makes one brand worth more money than another brand.
29 Jan 2020, 07:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
The stem argues that vitamins are all the same, so there's no reason to buy expensive natural vitamin products over cheaper synthetic vitamin products. That's only a good argument if vitamins are all anyone cares about; if there are other benefits to the natural products (unrelated to vitamins), there might be a very good reason to buy them instead of the cheap synthetic products. So E is the answer.
02 Feb 2020, 07:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
(A) The author doesn't have to assume that using vitamin pills is waste of money. He's only arguing that buying more expensive vitamin pills is a waste of money (compared to buying the cheaper, seemingly identical stuff)
(B) "always" is too strong. The author is definitely assuming that "sometimes" the natural vitamins are priced higher.
(C) "All" is too strong. If a vitamin pill were 100% natural, that wouldn't hurt the author's argument in any way.
(D) "false advertising" is too out of scope. A vitamin that claims it contains more natural ingredients isn't lying, in the author's eyes. It's just highlighting a feature of the product that the author thinks adds no value, since natural and synthetic vitamins are chemically identical.
(E) In order to weaken this argument (to argue the opposite of the conclusion), we need to justify why it's worth spending more for certain brands even if the vitamin content is exactly the same. This answer, if negated, says that there might be OTHER ingredients that make one brand more worthwhile. Maybe vitamins are harsh on your stomach, but some of the pricier brands include ginger in the vitamin, helping to ease in the digestion of the pill. Maybe some brands have coated capsules that make it easier to swallow the pill.
(B) "always" is too strong. The author is definitely assuming that "sometimes" the natural vitamins are priced higher.
(C) "All" is too strong. If a vitamin pill were 100% natural, that wouldn't hurt the author's argument in any way.
(D) "false advertising" is too out of scope. A vitamin that claims it contains more natural ingredients isn't lying, in the author's eyes. It's just highlighting a feature of the product that the author thinks adds no value, since natural and synthetic vitamins are chemically identical.
(E) In order to weaken this argument (to argue the opposite of the conclusion), we need to justify why it's worth spending more for certain brands even if the vitamin content is exactly the same. This answer, if negated, says that there might be OTHER ingredients that make one brand more worthwhile. Maybe vitamins are harsh on your stomach, but some of the pricier brands include ginger in the vitamin, helping to ease in the digestion of the pill. Maybe some brands have coated capsules that make it easier to swallow the pill.
