PrinceVegeta
I eliminated option D for the below reason.
Since what is given in the argument must be considered as a fact or true that cannot be considered as optinion
I could not eliminate answer choice E please explain
nightblade354 Given that since it's(The musical character of the performance) the only condition to come to that conclusion, it weakens the conclusion.!
(E) is exclusive to the LSAT. A sufficient vs. necessary condition mix up is where you have this: X --> Y as a premise, therefore: Y --> X OR
X -->
Y. Neither of the last two example are legitimate uses of logic.
In logic, you can only go one direction: X --> Y, therefore
Y -->
X. Anything beyond these two are not supported by the argument. For example: All kittens are cats (X --> Y), therefore if you are not a cat, you are not a kitten (
Y -->
X). If, however, you put all cats are kittens, reversing the above, this is a mix up of sufficient vs necessary and is wrong.