Hi rashminuligonda,This is a sharp instinct, and you're right that in general you shouldn't invent categories the problem never mentions. But here the question
itself takes care of the "other languages" worry, so let me show you where.
Look at the phrase in
Statement (2): "
20 of the members do not speak any of the
three languages." That bucket isn't "people who speak nothing at all" - it's "people who speak
none of English, German, or Spanish." So a Mandarin-only speaker, or someone who speaks Mandarin and French, or someone who speaks nothing - every single one of them lands in that same group of
20.
So the whole population of
200 splits cleanly into just these boxes:
- Only Spanish =
70- Only English =
60 (from Statement 1)
- English + German, and English + Spanish = the two-language people we want
-
None of the three languages = 20 (from Statement 2)
Mandarin never gets its own slot because it's already swept into that last box. That's why the equation
60 +
70 + (two-language) +
20 =
200 is complete - nothing is left uncounted.
The key idea: the question is only ever asking about the three named languages. Any other language a member speaks is irrelevant
unless it changes which of these boxes they fall into - and it doesn't. A Mandarin speaker either also speaks one of the three (then they're counted there) or doesn't (then they're in the
20).
So your rule - "don't assume things not stated" - actually still holds. We're not assuming Mandarin doesn't exist; we're noting the problem's wording already accounts for anyone who speaks it. That's what makes the two statements together
sufficient, giving
C.
Answer: Crashminuligonda
But how do we know there is no other language that s being spoken. what if some one is seaking mandarian? i read in previous questions that unless explicity stated, we shouldnt take this for granted