Off-shoring technology jobs has allowed American companies to signific

Can you please explain why option B is incorrect?????????

Meaning: Sending jobs overseas . . . has been blamed for X, Y, and Z. Those three items must be parallel.
The non-underlined portion contains the first item in the list.
Cutting is a gerund. (A verbING.) It acts as a noun does but keep verb-like qualities.
We need three gerunds.
We find them in A and B, but the third item in B is ungrammatical and a stylistic disaster.

• blamed for . . . cutting, . . . affecting, . . . and increasing.
• I see no problems.
It does not matter that an adjective precedes the gerund (verbING) in the third item.
All three are gerund phrases: a noun-like thing and modifiers.
KEEP.

• the phrase causing great increase in the unemployment rate is not grammatical.
-- The noun needs an article, this way: causing A great increase.
-- Even then, the phrase is not idiomatic.
Wrong: Journalists have chronicled great increase in the rate of hate crimes since the election of Donald Trump.
Wrong: The blizzard created great increase in the rate of car accidents.
• not idiomatic. We say "A steep, sharp, or rapid" increase in the rate of unemployment, but not "great increase."
• the phrase is clumsy and strange,
• OR, simply compare to option (A).
A) . . . greatly increasing the unemployment rate
B) . . .causing great increase in the unemployment rate
-- If nothing else, go with concision in (A).
Eliminate B.

• the objects of the preposition for (blamed for) are not parallel: cutting [jobs], thousands [affected], unemployment rate [increased]
gerund + object, noun+ past participle, noun + past participle.
Eliminate C

• The meaning is absurd: . . . also been blamed for cutting . . . thousands of affected Americans?
No. What, with knives? Nonsense.
Eliminate D[/color]

. . . "blamed for"cutting jobs, thousands affected,and great increase in the unemployment rate.
Not parallel; the errors are similar to those in C.
The problem in B returns in E. The phrase "blamed for great increase in the unemployment rate" is not grammatical, idiomatic, or rhetorically sound.
Eliminate E.

The answer is A.

Hi DilYeJiddiHai , please see my post below, here.

ssshyam1995 and chowdhurysakib71 , you asked the same question.

(tbhauer , just above you, gave one of the reasons that B is incorrect.)

I have a question for all three of you. I'm being completely honest.

Why is B better than A?
Pretend you haven't read my post.

Why were you thinking that B was better than A?

I was thinking that causing didn't fit well as the correct word to be parallel.

Posted from my mobile device

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.