GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Jul 2018, 22:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 258
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 Aug 2017, 09:02
3
28
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (00:37) correct 54% (01:15) wrong based on 1040 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

(A) so gradual as to be indistinguishable
(B) so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
(C) so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
(D) gradual enough not to be distinguishable
(E) gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them

Originally posted by study on 16 Jan 2009, 10:00.
Last edited by hazelnut on 13 Aug 2017, 09:02, edited 2 times in total.
Formatted the question.
Most Helpful Community Reply
3 KUDOS received
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1098
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2013, 06:45
3
3
fozzzy wrote:
Can someone provide a detailed analysis on this question. Thanks!


Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

3 options have incorrect idioms/constructs:

* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them

I think that the battle goes on between A and C.
* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished

I)Both have correct idioms.
II)Both are grammatically correct, and the meaning is the same.

So which should we pick? We have "indistinguishable" VS "they are unable to be distinguished". If you cannot eliminate an answer because of meaning/grammatical/structural errors, choose the one the conveys the meaning more efficiently. The first option is clearly more concise.
_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 192
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2009, 10:30
No problm with A.

C - closer but looks wordy compared to A
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 253
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2009, 10:44
selvae wrote:
No problm with A.

C - closer but looks wordy compared to A


agree with A. C is also incorrect because of "they"
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2425
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2009, 12:25
1
1
study wrote:
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them


Agree with A, which is idiomatic "so x as to be y" and meaningful.

No dispute for B, D and E.

C looks tempting but changes the meaning. "economic shifts" are neither able nor unable to be distinguished. They do not do that job rather they are indistinguishable for others i.e. people.
_________________

Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html


GT

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 258
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2009, 12:29
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 488
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2009, 15:28
TIger....Can you explain it more? Thx
GMAT TIGER wrote:
study wrote:
Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations in the financial markets

* so gradual as to be indistinguishable
* so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
* so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
* gradual enough not to be distinguishable
* gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them


Agree with A, which is idiomatic "so x as to be y" and meaningful.

No dispute for B, D and E.

C looks tempting but changes the meaning. "economic shifts" are neither able nor unable to be distinguished. They do not do that job rather they are indistinguishable for others i.e. people.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 817
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2009, 16:28
study wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.

Here is how I understand it:

so X as to Y
X is usually an adjective, Y is an adverb or adverbial phrase - NOT clause!

so ... that...
What comes after "that" has to be a clause.

If anyone has got live examples, I'd be happy to discuss to my ability.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 817
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2009, 16:31
Here is an example from 1000 SC (26)
26. A recording system was so secretly installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office that even Theodore C. Sorensen, the White House counsel, did not know it existed.
(A) A recording system was so secretly installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office that
(B) So secret was a recording system installation and operation in the Kennedy Oval Office
(C) It was so secret that a recording system was installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office
(D) A recording system that was so secretly installed and operated in the Kennedy Oval Office
(E) Installed and operated so secretly in the Kennedy Oval Office was a recording system that

OA: A
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 229
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2009, 18:53
so....as to ...
is this correct idiom? Can't find any examples on the internet.
I chose E. just use so that
botirvoy wrote:
study wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.

Here is how I understand it:

so X as to Y
X is usually an adjective, Y is an adverb or adverbial phrase - NOT clause!

so ... that...
What comes after "that" has to be a clause.

If anyone has got live examples, I'd be happy to discuss to my ability.

_________________

-----------------------
tusharvk

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 433
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2009, 20:18
botirvoy wrote:
study wrote:
Can someone explain the difference between the foll two

so ...as to
so ...that

when to/not to use the above. it's confusing.

Here is how I understand it:

so X as to Y
X is usually an adjective, Y is an adverb or adverbial phrase - NOT clause!

so ... that...
What comes after "that" has to be a clause.

If anyone has got live examples, I'd be happy to discuss to my ability.


Botirvoy,
Which is the adverbial phrase in this sentence? I do not see any adverb.
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1477
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2009, 22:34
I will go for D.

I have read in OG11 that so X as to Y is not a correct idiom.
Also, so X that Y in option C changes the meaning.
E is wordy.
D seems to be the best.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1179
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2009, 04:18
My choice is also D.
@Study, can u post the OA pls?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 27
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2009, 16:43
This is a GMAT prep problem and OA is A.

I don't understand what's wrong with D.
4 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 291
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2009, 01:50
4
1
DFG5150 wrote:
This is a GMAT prep problem and OA is A.

I don't understand what's wrong with D.


IMO
I think enough not to is not correct; the question should read "Often major economic shifts are not gradual enough to be ..."
There is a different in meaning between so ...as and enough to


X enough to Y is used when the emphasis is on Y. "So X as to Y" is used when the emphasis is on X

1. "I am tall enough to touch the ceiling" implies that the focus is on the fact of being able to touch the ceiling.
2." I am so tall as to be able to touch the ceiling" implies that the focus is on the fact of being tall

more examples

1. The lion was so tame that the lionkeeper could enter its cage
2. The lion was tame enough for the lioonkeeper to enter its cage
3. It was such a clear introductory lecture that we decided to take the course
4. It was a clear enough introductory lecture for us to decide to take the course
5. sentence 1 suggests that the lion was very time, whereas 2 does not
6. sentence 3 suggests that the lecture was very clear, while 4 does not


option C is wrong because after able or unable the verb to be is considered wordy; you use the verb to be twice

be able to be ...
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 291
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2009, 01:54
1
bigtreezl wrote:
E is clear and concise


IMO the correct idioms with enough are
enough to and enough for
so E cannot be the correct answer choice
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 202
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2009, 04:40
A and D are very tempting, but we should choose A since the accent here is on "gradually" and so the answer is A.
_________________

Consider giving Kudos if you like the post.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 135
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Mar 2012, 04:35
1
OA is A.

1. so gradual as to be indistinguishable
Option 1 correctly follows the idiom "SO X AS TO Y".
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 818
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jul 2013, 03:15
Can someone provide a detailed analysis on this question. Thanks!
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 664
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2017, 13:06
2
A) so gradual as to be indistinguishable
"so... as to be..." is a correct idiom.

B) so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
"so... so that..." is not a correct idiom

C) so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
This one is tough, because it's not grammatically or idiomatically incorrect. "So... that" is a correct idiom. It's certainly wordier than A, and there also seems to be a disconnect in meaning. If something is "indistinguishable," then people are not able to distinguish it. Here, saying that the "shifts... are unable to be distinguished," then the lack of ability is on the part of the shifts, and not on the people distinguishing. This is a case in which passive voice alters the meaning slightly, and therefore makes less sense.

D) gradual enough not to be indistinguishable
"gradual enough" means something different from "so gradual." "Enough" implies a sufficient quantity, above a certain threshold - "I have enough money to by the new laptop." "So" is a qualifier meaning "to such a degree that." For example, "I have so much money that I could buy all of the laptops in the world." It doesn't imply any threshold.

E) gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
Same issue as in D.

The correct answer is A.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Re: Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable   [#permalink] 30 Aug 2017, 13:06

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.