Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 09:10 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 09:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,989
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,989
Kudos: 2,031
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abennett
Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Last visit: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Alex_NL
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Last visit: 23 Feb 2005
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 100
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,989
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,989
Kudos: 2,031
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here's what the OE did, which I wasn't entirely convinced.

For statement 1: z > x+y+1

It says statement 1 is not sufficient. What it did was to use x + y + z > 0, so x+y > -z, so that using (1), z > x+y+1>-z+1, impllies z > 0.5. What happens here is it took x+y to be equal to -z and substituted it inside the inequality. But x+y is not equals -z, it is greater than -z. So x+y can be anything, say, -z+1, or -z+20 etc. So if x+y=-z+20, then z > -z+20+1, 2z > 21, z > 21/2 !

For statement 2: x+y<-1, so z>1 for x+y+z>0.

What do you think of the OE for statement (1) ?
avatar
Nitinag
Joined: 02 Sep 2004
Last visit: 23 Mar 2005
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Posts: 34
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1 is insufficient while statement 2 is sufficient.
1) is insufficient cause -
We have x + y + z > 0 given and by 1) z> x + y + 1.

Take x = -.75, y = 0.25 and z = 0.75. We satisfy both the equations.
Yet z<1.
Take x = 1, y = 1 and z =4. We again satisy both equations but z>1

So insufficient.

Mathematical proof.
Add both inequatities - Addition does not change signs.
we get x + y + 2z > x + y + 1
Which is 2z > 1 or z > 1/2

Thus if the question were - is z > 1/2 then answer would be D.
Hope this ends the debate....
User avatar
twixt
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Last visit: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 283
Own Kudos:
Posts: 283
Kudos: 390
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My 1st draft :

1) x+y+z>0 & z>x+y+1

id est 2z>x+y+z+1>1 which means that z>1/2 No

2) x+y+z>0 x+y>-z

id est -z+1 z>1 OK

I would choose answer B



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts