Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 12:12 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 12:12

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Dec 2012
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 90 [8]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 738
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 738
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 738
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Send PM
Re: On the GMAT, very few concepts are more daunting than [#permalink]
AndrewN - Request you to please help me with me, as I seem to be missing something here.

Pankaj0901 wrote:
Is "are" not redundant in the below example?

According to me, the correct version should be:
Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but are also easy to mix up.

Idioms are:
(not only) difficult to memorize
(but also) easy to mix up.

Request you to please throw some light on this.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6857 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: On the GMAT, very few concepts are more daunting than [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Pankaj0901 wrote:
AndrewN - Request you to please help me with me, as I seem to be missing something here.

Pankaj0901 wrote:
Is "are" not redundant in the below example?

According to me, the correct version should be:
Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but are also easy to mix up.

Idioms are:
(not only) difficult to memorize
(but also) easy to mix up.

Request you to please throw some light on this.

Typically, a not only... but also construct will see whatever precedes not only carry over into the second element, the one that follows but also. The sentence in question is a strange one in that the word in question is a helping verb, are. Does it need to be repeated? Does the more streamlined version make sense?

Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but also easy to mix up.

Sure, I have no problem with the sentence, one that clearly expresses at the tail-end the notion that idioms are easy to mix up. Do I have a problem with the repetition of are? No, not exactly. This is not a transitive verb such as run that would lead to a clearly incorrect repetition if it fell outside the not only:

He ran not only to the store but also ran to the arcade.

I guess I would have to see a Sentence Correction question in which the only decisive consideration was between a sentence with an extra are or one without. Otherwise, I would not worry too much about such a contingency.

I hope that helps a bit. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Posts: 425
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [0]
Given Kudos: 738
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Send PM
Re: On the GMAT, very few concepts are more daunting than [#permalink]
Thank you! :)

AndrewN wrote:
Pankaj0901 wrote:
AndrewN - Request you to please help me with me, as I seem to be missing something here.

Pankaj0901 wrote:
Is "are" not redundant in the below example?

According to me, the correct version should be:
Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but are also easy to mix up.

Idioms are:
(not only) difficult to memorize
(but also) easy to mix up.

Request you to please throw some light on this.

Typically, a not only... but also construct will see whatever precedes not only carry over into the second element, the one that follows but also. The sentence in question is a strange one in that the word in question is a helping verb, are. Does it need to be repeated? Does the more streamlined version make sense?

Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but also easy to mix up.

Sure, I have no problem with the sentence, one that clearly expresses at the tail-end the notion that idioms are easy to mix up. Do I have a problem with the repetition of are? No, not exactly. This is not a transitive verb such as run that would lead to a clearly incorrect repetition if it fell outside the not only:

He ran not only to the store but also ran to the arcade.

I guess I would have to see a Sentence Correction question in which the only decisive consideration was between a sentence with an extra are or one without. Otherwise, I would not worry too much about such a contingency.

I hope that helps a bit. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
GMAT Club Bot
Re: On the GMAT, very few concepts are more daunting than [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6919 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
13958 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne