Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
dineshyamato
Joined: 23 Dec 2012
Last visit: 23 Mar 2013
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
105
 [8]
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 6
Kudos: 105
 [8]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN - Request you to please help me with me, as I seem to be missing something here.

Pankaj0901
Is "are" not redundant in the below example?

According to me, the correct version should be:
Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but are also easy to mix up.

Idioms are:
(not only) difficult to memorize
(but also) easy to mix up.

Request you to please throw some light on this.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,511
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pankaj0901
AndrewN - Request you to please help me with me, as I seem to be missing something here.

Pankaj0901
Is "are" not redundant in the below example?

According to me, the correct version should be:
Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but are also easy to mix up.

Idioms are:
(not only) difficult to memorize
(but also) easy to mix up.

Request you to please throw some light on this.
Typically, a not only... but also construct will see whatever precedes not only carry over into the second element, the one that follows but also. The sentence in question is a strange one in that the word in question is a helping verb, are. Does it need to be repeated? Does the more streamlined version make sense?

Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but also easy to mix up.

Sure, I have no problem with the sentence, one that clearly expresses at the tail-end the notion that idioms are easy to mix up. Do I have a problem with the repetition of are? No, not exactly. This is not a transitive verb such as run that would lead to a clearly incorrect repetition if it fell outside the not only:

He ran not only to the store but also ran to the arcade.

I guess I would have to see a Sentence Correction question in which the only decisive consideration was between a sentence with an extra are or one without. Otherwise, I would not worry too much about such a contingency.

I hope that helps a bit. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
Pankaj0901
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 419
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 737
Location: India
WE:Account Management (Hospitality and Tourism)
Posts: 419
Kudos: 51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you! :)

AndrewN

Typically, a not only... but also construct will see whatever precedes not only carry over into the second element, the one that follows but also. The sentence in question is a strange one in that the word in question is a helping verb, are. Does it need to be repeated? Does the more streamlined version make sense?

Idioms are not only difficult to memorize but also easy to mix up.

Sure, I have no problem with the sentence, one that clearly expresses at the tail-end the notion that idioms are easy to mix up. Do I have a problem with the repetition of are? No, not exactly. This is not a transitive verb such as run that would lead to a clearly incorrect repetition if it fell outside the not only:

He ran not only to the store but also ran to the arcade.

I guess I would have to see a Sentence Correction question in which the only decisive consideration was between a sentence with an extra are or one without. Otherwise, I would not worry too much about such a contingency.

I hope that helps a bit. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
189 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts