Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 1007

On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 07 Dec 2016, 04:08
Question Stats:
38% (07:48) correct 62% (03:20) wrong based on 293 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3. If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15, what is the value of c? Take a stab at this fresh question from eGMAT. Post your analysis below. Official Solution to be provided after receiving some good analyses.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 145
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, International Business
GPA: 3

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2016, 05:49
Let dist between a and 0 be x,then that between a and b would be 2x,and between b and C would be x. Mod b15 = 2* Mod 15a So, x= 9 Therefore mod c = 27 Sent from my HM 1SW using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



Intern
Status: I am not giving up. Not yet.
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 47

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2016, 11:41
1
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
Let Point a'x" units away from 0 Point b 3x units away from 0 Point C 4x units away from 0. 15 has to be between points a and b such that 3x15=2(15x) => x=9 Point c=4x=4*9=36. Hence C+1 Kudos to show your appreciation.
_________________
Cheers PeeKay



Intern
Joined: 19 Nov 2016
Posts: 7

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2016, 21:49
3
This post received KUDOS
From: "The distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3" Set a= 1, we have b = 3 and c =4 => a : b : c is in the ratio of 1 : 3 : 4 => c is divisible by 4 => c is 36 C



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 1007

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 04 Dec 2016, 23:50
Alright, let's look at the detailed solution of the above question. Let's use the concept of absolute value \(pq\) as the distance between the point p and q on the number line to solve this question. GivenThe following information is given in the question. • Points a, b and c such that \(c > b > a\) • \(a: (b – a) : (c – a) = 1: 2: 3\) • \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\) (We are taking the absolute values here, as we do not know the position of 15 with respect to a and b. For example, if \(b > 15\), then \(b – 15 = b – 15\) but if b < 15, then\(b – 15 = (15  b)\) Let’s assume the value of a to be x. Hence, \(ba = 2x\) and substituting the value of a, we get the value of \(b = 3x\) Similarly, the value of \(c = 4x\) To findAs, we need to find c, which is the distance of c from the origin, we can say that \(c = 4x\) Approach and Working OutNow, we are given the relationship between the distance of points a and b with respect to 15. However, we do not know the position of 15 with respect to a and b on the number line. So, the following cases can occur depending upon the position of 15 on the number line: o Distance between 15 and \(a = a – 15 = x – 15\) (as a is greater than 15) o Distance between 15 and b = \(b – 15 = 3x – 15\) (as b is greater than 15) o \(3x – 15 = 2*(x – 15)\) {as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\)} o \(3x – 15 = 2x – 30\) o \(x = 15\), which is not possible as x is the coordinate of a point that lies on the right hand side of 0, i.e. it is positive. So, \(x > 0\). o Thus, we can reject this case. o Distance between 15 and a = \(15 – a = 15 – x\) (as 15 is greater than a) o Distance between 15 and b = \(b – 15 = 3x – 15\) (as b is greater than 15) o \(3x – 15 = 2*(15 – x)\){as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\)} o \(3x – 15 = 30 – 2x\) o \(5x = 45\), i.e. \(x = 9\). o In this case we have assumed that \(a < 15\). So, \(x < 15\) (As the coordinate of point a is x). Also \(x > 0\), since it is the coordinate of a point that lies on the right hand side of 0. o So, \(0 < x< 15\). As we have calculated \(x = 9\), this is a possible case o We have calculated above, the value of \(c = 4x\). So, we have \(4x = 36\) o Distance between 15 and a = \(15 – a = 15 – x\) (as 15 is greater than a) o Distance between 15 and b = \(15 – b = 15 – 3x\) (as 15 is greater than b) o \(15 – 3x = 2*( 15 – x)\) {as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\) } o \(15 – 3x = 30 – 2x\), i.e. \(x = 15\), o We know that \(x > 0\). So, \(x = 15\) is not a valid value. o Thus, we can reject this case. Therefore, the value of cis 36 Correct Answer: C
_________________
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 1007

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Nov 2016, 07:02
nailin16 wrote: Let dist between a and 0 be x,then that between a and b would be 2x,and between b and C would be x. Mod b15 = 2* Mod 15a So, x= 9 Therefore mod c = 27 Sent from my HM 1SW using GMAT Club Forum mobile appYou have correctly calculated the value of x i.e. the distance between point a and 0 on the number line. However, the value of c is 4x, and hence the answer would be 36. Kindly review our solution above to understand where you went wrong.
_________________
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 1007

On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2016, 05:53
khiemchii wrote: From: "The distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3" Set a= 1, we have b = 3 and c =4 => a : b : c is in the ratio of 1 : 3 : 4 => c is divisible by 4 => c is 36 C There is a small flaw in your approach. You seem to have assumed c as a multiple of 4, which may not be the case always. For instance, let's look at a slightly different version of the same question. On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3. If the distance of point b from 11.25 is twice the distance of point a from 15, what is the value of c?
Solve this question using the approach mentioned by you and also using the solution provided by us. If you use the approach mentioned by you in your response, you will still the answer as 36 (Choice C). However, the answer to this modified version would be 27 (choice B), which is clearly not a multiple of 4.
_________________
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 26
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 3.99

On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2016, 07:04
EgmatQuantExpert wrote: If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15 In your previous explanation you have also placed the point "15" to the left of A and to the right of B, but would this even be possible given the above limitation? Given the order of the letters, the only way I can see this condition being met is if 15 is 1/3 on the line between A and B. I would appreciate your response.



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 1007

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2016, 22:38
koenh wrote: EgmatQuantExpert wrote: If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15 In your previous explanation you have also placed the point "15" to the left of A and to the right of B, but would this even be possible given the above limitation? Given the order of the letters, the only way I can see this condition being met is if 15 is 1/3 on the line between A and B. I would appreciate your response. Yes, you're absolutely right. We have taken these cases as Case I (15 to the left of a or a>15) and Case III (15 to the right of B, 15>b). However, if you go through our explanation in details, you will understand that we have also concluded that these cases are not possible. Hence, the only case possible is Case II, in which 15 lies between a and b. The same has been explained in details in the solution. The reason why we have discussed all possibilities is to ensure that we critically analyze all cases before arriving at a conclusion. Doing so, is extremely important while solving GMAT questions. Regards, Saquib
_________________
 '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub  70 point improvement guarantee  www.egmat.com



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 6655

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . . [#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Mar 2018, 11:08
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Books  GMAT Club Tests  Best Prices on GMAT Courses  GMAT Mobile App  Math Resources  Verbal Resources




Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
20 Mar 2018, 11:08






