Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3209

On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 07 Aug 2018, 04:27
Question Stats:
35% (03:17) correct 65% (03:17) wrong based on 341 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3. If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15, what is the value of c? Take a stab at this fresh question from eGMAT. Post your analysis below. To read all our articles:Must Read articles to reach Q51To solve question of the week:Question of the WeekOfficial Solution to be provided after receiving some good analyses.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3209

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 04 Dec 2016, 23:50
Alright, let's look at the detailed solution of the above question. Let's use the concept of absolute value \(pq\) as the distance between the point p and q on the number line to solve this question. GivenThe following information is given in the question. • Points a, b and c such that \(c > b > a\) • \(a: (b – a) : (c – a) = 1: 2: 3\) • \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\) (We are taking the absolute values here, as we do not know the position of 15 with respect to a and b. For example, if \(b > 15\), then \(b – 15 = b – 15\) but if b < 15, then\(b – 15 = (15  b)\) Let’s assume the value of a to be x. Hence, \(ba = 2x\) and substituting the value of a, we get the value of \(b = 3x\) Similarly, the value of \(c = 4x\) To findAs, we need to find c, which is the distance of c from the origin, we can say that \(c = 4x\) Approach and Working OutNow, we are given the relationship between the distance of points a and b with respect to 15. However, we do not know the position of 15 with respect to a and b on the number line. So, the following cases can occur depending upon the position of 15 on the number line: o Distance between 15 and \(a = a – 15 = x – 15\) (as a is greater than 15) o Distance between 15 and b = \(b – 15 = 3x – 15\) (as b is greater than 15) o \(3x – 15 = 2*(x – 15)\) {as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\)} o \(3x – 15 = 2x – 30\) o \(x = 15\), which is not possible as x is the coordinate of a point that lies on the right hand side of 0, i.e. it is positive. So, \(x > 0\). o Thus, we can reject this case. o Distance between 15 and a = \(15 – a = 15 – x\) (as 15 is greater than a) o Distance between 15 and b = \(b – 15 = 3x – 15\) (as b is greater than 15) o \(3x – 15 = 2*(15 – x)\){as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\)} o \(3x – 15 = 30 – 2x\) o \(5x = 45\), i.e. \(x = 9\). o In this case we have assumed that \(a < 15\). So, \(x < 15\) (As the coordinate of point a is x). Also \(x > 0\), since it is the coordinate of a point that lies on the right hand side of 0. o So, \(0 < x< 15\). As we have calculated \(x = 9\), this is a possible case o We have calculated above, the value of \(c = 4x\). So, we have \(4x = 36\) o Distance between 15 and a = \(15 – a = 15 – x\) (as 15 is greater than a) o Distance between 15 and b = \(15 – b = 15 – 3x\) (as 15 is greater than b) o \(15 – 3x = 2*( 15 – x)\) {as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\) } o \(15 – 3x = 30 – 2x\), i.e. \(x = 15\), o We know that \(x > 0\). So, \(x = 15\) is not a valid value. o Thus, we can reject this case. Therefore, the value of cis 36 Correct Answer: C
_________________




Intern
Status: I am not giving up. Not yet.
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 40

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2016, 11:41
Let Point a'x" units away from 0 Point b 3x units away from 0 Point C 4x units away from 0. 15 has to be between points a and b such that 3x15=2(15x) => x=9 Point c=4x=4*9=36. Hence C+1 Kudos to show your appreciation.
_________________




Manager
Joined: 05 Apr 2014
Posts: 136
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, International Business
GPA: 3

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Nov 2016, 05:49
Let dist between a and 0 be x,then that between a and b would be 2x,and between b and C would be x. Mod b15 = 2* Mod 15a So, x= 9 Therefore mod c = 27 Sent from my HM 1SW using GMAT Club Forum mobile app



Intern
Joined: 19 Nov 2016
Posts: 9

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Nov 2016, 21:49
From: "The distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3" Set a= 1, we have b = 3 and c =4 => a : b : c is in the ratio of 1 : 3 : 4 => c is divisible by 4 => c is 36 C



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3209

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Nov 2016, 07:02
nailin16 wrote: Let dist between a and 0 be x,then that between a and b would be 2x,and between b and C would be x. Mod b15 = 2* Mod 15a So, x= 9 Therefore mod c = 27 Sent from my HM 1SW using GMAT Club Forum mobile appYou have correctly calculated the value of x i.e. the distance between point a and 0 on the number line. However, the value of c is 4x, and hence the answer would be 36. Kindly review our solution above to understand where you went wrong.
_________________



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3209

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2016, 05:53
khiemchii wrote: From: "The distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3" Set a= 1, we have b = 3 and c =4 => a : b : c is in the ratio of 1 : 3 : 4 => c is divisible by 4 => c is 36 C There is a small flaw in your approach. You seem to have assumed c as a multiple of 4, which may not be the case always. For instance, let's look at a slightly different version of the same question. On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3. If the distance of point b from 11.25 is twice the distance of point a from 15, what is the value of c?
Solve this question using the approach mentioned by you and also using the solution provided by us. If you use the approach mentioned by you in your response, you will still the answer as 36 (Choice C). However, the answer to this modified version would be 27 (choice B), which is clearly not a multiple of 4.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 23
Location: Netherlands
GPA: 3.99

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2016, 07:04
EgmatQuantExpert wrote: If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15 In your previous explanation you have also placed the point "15" to the left of A and to the right of B, but would this even be possible given the above limitation? Given the order of the letters, the only way I can see this condition being met is if 15 is 1/3 on the line between A and B. I would appreciate your response.



eGMAT Representative
Joined: 04 Jan 2015
Posts: 3209

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2016, 22:38
koenh wrote: EgmatQuantExpert wrote: If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15 In your previous explanation you have also placed the point "15" to the left of A and to the right of B, but would this even be possible given the above limitation? Given the order of the letters, the only way I can see this condition being met is if 15 is 1/3 on the line between A and B. I would appreciate your response. Yes, you're absolutely right. We have taken these cases as Case I (15 to the left of a or a>15) and Case III (15 to the right of B, 15>b). However, if you go through our explanation in details, you will understand that we have also concluded that these cases are not possible. Hence, the only case possible is Case II, in which 15 lies between a and b. The same has been explained in details in the solution. The reason why we have discussed all possibilities is to ensure that we critically analyze all cases before arriving at a conclusion. Doing so, is extremely important while solving GMAT questions. Regards, Saquib
_________________



GMATH Teacher
Status: GMATH founder
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Posts: 935

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2018, 10:35
EgmatQuantExpert wrote: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a, a and b, and a and c is in the ratio of 1:2:3. If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15, what is the value of c? Using info given (figure included) we have DATA and FOCUS as below: \(0 < a < b < c\,\,\left( * \right)\) \({\text{dist}}\left( {0,a} \right) = a\) \(\left. \begin{gathered} {\text{dist}}\left( {a,b} \right) = 2a\, \hfill \\ {\text{dist}}\left( {a,c} \right) = 3a \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right\}\,\,\,\mathop \Rightarrow \limits^{\left( * \right)} \,\,\,{\text{dist}}\left( {b,c} \right) = 3a  2a = a\) \(? = c = 4a\) From the fact that \({\text{dist}}\left( {b,15} \right) = 2 \cdot {\text{dist}}\left( {a,15} \right)\) we have three possible scenarios: \(b < 15:\) \(15  b = 2\left( {15  a} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,15 = 2a  b = 2a  3a =  a\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,a < 0\,\,\,\,{\text{impossible}}\,\,\) \(a < 15 \leqslant b:\) \(b  15 = 2\left( {15  a} \right)\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,\,\,3 \cdot 15 = 2a + b = 2a + 3a = 5a\,\,\,\, \Rightarrow \,\,? = 4a = 4 \cdot 9 = 36\) And from the fact that we have already found (one viable) correct alternative choice, no need to evaluate the third scenario! This solution follows the notations and rationale taught in the GMATH method. Regards, Fabio.
Attachments
18Set18_3w.gif [ 1.92 KiB  Viewed 2584 times ]
_________________
Fabio Skilnik :: GMATH method creator (Math for the GMAT) Our highlevel "quant" preparation starts here: https://gmath.net



Intern
Joined: 27 Apr 2018
Posts: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3.9

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Sep 2018, 11:27
EgmatQuantExpert wrote: koenh wrote: EgmatQuantExpert wrote: If the distance of point b from 15 is twice the distance of point a from 15 In your previous explanation you have also placed the point "15" to the left of A and to the right of B, but would this even be possible given the above limitation? Given the order of the letters, the only way I can see this condition being met is if 15 is 1/3 on the line between A and B. I would appreciate your response. Yes, you're absolutely right. We have taken these cases as Case I (15 to the left of a or a>15) and Case III (15 to the right of B, 15>b). However, if you go through our explanation in details, you will understand that we have also concluded that these cases are not possible. Hence, the only case possible is Case II, in which 15 lies between a and b. The same has been explained in details in the solution. The reason why we have discussed all possibilities is to ensure that we critically analyze all cases before arriving at a conclusion. Doing so, is extremely important while solving GMAT questions. Regards, Saquib Hello!! With all respect, I request you to explain how you got C=4x ?? I am getting a lil bit confused here. Thank you in advance.



Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2019
Posts: 19
Location: United States

Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Nov 2019, 19:03
EgmatQuantExpert wrote: Alright, let's look at the detailed solution of the above question. Let's use the concept of absolute value \(pq\) as the distance between the point p and q on the number line to solve this question. GivenThe following information is given in the question. • Points a, b and c such that \(c > b > a\) • \(a: (b – a) : (c – a) = 1: 2: 3\) • \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\) (We are taking the absolute values here, as we do not know the position of 15 with respect to a and b. For example, if \(b > 15\), then \(b – 15 = b – 15\) but if b < 15, then\(b – 15 = (15  b)\) Let’s assume the value of a to be x. Hence, \(ba = 2x\) and substituting the value of a, we get the value of \(b = 3x\) Similarly, the value of \(c = 4x\) To findAs, we need to find c, which is the distance of c from the origin, we can say that \(c = 4x\) Approach and Working OutNow, we are given the relationship between the distance of points a and b with respect to 15. However, we do not know the position of 15 with respect to a and b on the number line. So, the following cases can occur depending upon the position of 15 on the number line: o Distance between 15 and \(a = a – 15 = x – 15\) (as a is greater than 15) o Distance between 15 and b = \(b – 15 = 3x – 15\) (as b is greater than 15) o \(3x – 15 = 2*(x – 15)\) {as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\)} o \(3x – 15 = 2x – 30\) o \(x = 15\), which is not possible as x is the coordinate of a point that lies on the right hand side of 0, i.e. it is positive. So, \(x > 0\). o Thus, we can reject this case. o Distance between 15 and a = \(15 – a = 15 – x\) (as 15 is greater than a) o Distance between 15 and b = \(b – 15 = 3x – 15\) (as b is greater than 15) o \(3x – 15 = 2*(15 – x)\){as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\)} o \(3x – 15 = 30 – 2x\) o \(5x = 45\), i.e. \(x = 9\). o In this case we have assumed that \(a < 15\). So, \(x < 15\) (As the coordinate of point a is x). Also \(x > 0\), since it is the coordinate of a point that lies on the right hand side of 0. o So, \(0 < x< 15\). As we have calculated \(x = 9\), this is a possible case o We have calculated above, the value of \(c = 4x\). So, we have \(4x = 36\) o Distance between 15 and a = \(15 – a = 15 – x\) (as 15 is greater than a) o Distance between 15 and b = \(15 – b = 15 – 3x\) (as 15 is greater than b) o \(15 – 3x = 2*( 15 – x)\) {as \(b – 15 = 2 * a15\) } o \(15 – 3x = 30 – 2x\), i.e. \(x = 15\), o We know that \(x > 0\). So, \(x = 15\) is not a valid value. o Thus, we can reject this case. Therefore, the value of cis 36 Correct Answer: Cafter we establish c = 4x...can we just look at the answer choices for multiples of 4 and narrow down to choice C




Re: On the number line shown, the distance between 0 and a . . .
[#permalink]
01 Nov 2019, 19:03






