GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2018, 12:26

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 30 Dec 2016
Posts: 230
Schools: Schulich
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V37
GPA: 4
WE: Business Development (Other)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 24 Jan 2018, 21:52
4
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 86 sessions

45% (03:03) correct 55% (04:05) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 82 sessions

77% (01:30) correct 23% (01:37) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 83 sessions

20% (01:40) correct 80% (01:44) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

based on 76 sessions

37% (01:52) correct 63% (01:30) wrong

HideShow timer Statistics

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries. The National Park Organic Act established the national park system and empowered the Secretary of the Interior to manage activities within the parks. Conditions outside park boundaries are not subject to regulation by the Park Service unless they involve the direct use of park resources.

Several approaches to protecting the national parks from external degradation have been proposed, such as one focusing on enacting federal legislation granting the National Park Service broader powers over lands adjacent to the national parks. Legislation addressing external threats to the national parks twice passed the House of Representatives but died without action in the Senate. Also brought to the table as a possible remedy is giving the states bordering the parks a significant and meaningful role in developing federal park management policy.

Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife.

Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem. Priorities among different land uses are not generally established by current legislation. Additionally, often no mechanism exists to coordinate planning by the state environmental regulatory agencies. These factors limit the impact of legislation aimed at protecting park wildlife and the larger park ecosystem.

Even if these deficiencies can be overcome, state participation must be consistent with existing federal legislation. States lack jurisdiction within national parks themselves, and therefore state solutions cannot reach activities inside the parks, thus limiting state action to the land adjacent to the national parks. Under the supremacy clause, federal laws and regulations supersede state action if state law conflicts with federal legislation, if Congress precludes local regulation, or if federal regulation is so pervasive that no room remains for state control. Assuming that federal regulations leave open the possibility of state control, state participation in policy making must be harmonized with existing federal legislation.

The residents of states bordering national parks are affected by park management policies. They in turn affect the success of those policies. This interrelationship must be considered in responding to the external threats problem. Local participation is necessary in deciding how to protect park wildlife. Local interests should not, however, dictate national policy, nor should they be used as a pretext to ignore the threats to park regions.

1. What is the main purpose of the author in writing the passage?

A. argue that rampant timber harvesting is degrading national parks
B. describe a plan of action to resolve an issue
C. discuss different approaches to dealing with a problem
D. suggest that local participation is necessary to solve the problem described
E. to assert that national parks are adversely affected by activities outside their boundaries


2. The passage provides support for which of the following assertions?

A. The National Park Organic Act gave the Secretary of the Interior the right to overrule state government policy in lands adjacent to national parks.
B. The federal government has been selling national park land to state governments in order to raise money for wildlife conservation.
C. The actions of state governments have often failed to promote the interests of national park wildlife.
D. Local politicians want the federal government to turn control of national parks over to state governments.
E. Timber harvesting and energy exploration have not had any impact on national parks


3. In the context of the passage, the phrase external degradation (lines 8-9) refers to which of the following:

A. threats to national parks arising from the House of Representative's willingness to address environmental issues.
B. threats to national parks arising from state government environmental policies.
C. threats to national parks arising from local politicians‘ calls for greater state involvement in national park planning.
D. threats to national parks arising from the National Park Organic Act.
E. threats to national parks arising from the lack of local support


4. According to the passage, which of the following developments is most likely if environmental cooperation between the federal government and state governments does not improve?
A. A further decline in the land area of national parks
B. A further increase in federal ownership of land adjacent to national parks
C. A further growth in the powers of the National Park Service
D. A further loss of species in national parks
E. A further increase in timber harvesting activities


_________________

Regards
SandySilva


____________
Please appreciate the efforts by pressing +1 KUDOS (:


Originally posted by sandysilva on 24 Jan 2018, 12:42.
Last edited by broall on 24 Jan 2018, 21:52, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted questions
Senior RC Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Perfecting myself for GMAT
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 759
Concentration: Nonprofit
Schools: Haas '21
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2018, 19:03
2

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions


_________________

If you like my post press kudos +1

New - RC Butler - 2 RC's everyday

Tag me in RC questions if you need help. Please provide your analysis of the question in the post along with the tag.

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Posts: 234
Re: Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2018, 23:30
can we have explanations for q3 and q4 please
RC Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Aug 2016
Posts: 400
Location: Canada
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V28
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2018, 20:51
1
Question 1
1. What is the main purpose of the author in writing the passage? ........C. discuss different approaches to dealing with a problem

Question 2
2. The passage provides support for which of the following assertions? ........C. The actions of state governments have often failed to promote the interests of national park wildlife.
Supported by : Para 03 : "Because the livelihood of many citizens is linked to the management of national parks, local politicians often encourage state involvement in federal planning. But, state legislatures have not always addressed the fundamental policy issues of whether states should protect park wildlife. "



Question 4
4. According to the passage, which of the following developments is most likely if environmental cooperation between the federal government and state governments does not improve? .......................................D. A further loss of species in national parks
Supported by : Para 04 : "Timber harvesting, ranching and energy exploration compete with wildlife within the local ecosystem."


workout ..... Need Help with : Question 3 reasoning


Question 3
3. In the context of the passage, the phrase external degradation (lines 8-9) refers to which of the following: ..........B. threats to national parks arising from state government environmental policies.
Supported by : ....again Para 3 & 4. threatened by local activities......... on which the local livelyhood depends... local politicians support people & activity...... thus state govt's eco policy is not facilitation of the preservation of the wilderness of the national parks.
_________________

Please let me know if I am going in wrong direction.
Thanks in appreciation.

CR Forum Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 236
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2018, 21:01
rahulkashyap wrote:
can we have explanations for q3 and q4 please


rahulkashyap

OE for Q3.

Go back to the lines before and after the phrase to judge its meaning in context.The phrase refers back to the damage mentioned in ¶1, and is expanded on in the lines below. The author believes that the damage outside park boundaries is supported by state governments, as is argued in ¶s3 and 4. (B) summarizes the nature of the ―external degradation.‖
(A): Out of Scope. Not only does (A) not touch on the meaning of the phrase, but it makes no sense: if the House is willing to address environmental issues, why would parks be threatened?
(B): The Correct Answer
(C): Out of Scope. The interest of local politicians in park management is mentioned in ¶3. However, there‘s no sense from this that the politicians are threatening the parks; rather, they would be more interested in preserving them since the local economies depend on them.
(D): Out of Scope. While the author thinks that the Act leaves some gaps that need to be filled, there‘s no suggestion that it‘s directly threatening the parks.
(E): Local support comes in the last paragraph and is clearly not what the author implies by ‗external degradation‘


OE for Q4.

4) The ―according to the passage...‖ start to the question tips you off to look for a detail within the passage. Where is the scenario in the question mentioned? Go
to the last paragraph, which discusses a combination of national and local responses. It argues that this cooperation is necessary in order to ―protect park
wildlife.‖ If this cooperation doesn't occur then, wildlife would presumably be harmed. (D) rewards the careful reading.
(A): Out of Scope. The author never mentions any actual shrinking of national parks, only the danger to the existing land.
(B): Out of Scope. The author argues that the federal government already owns most of the land around national parks, and doesn't suggest anywhere that it will own more without cooperation.
(C): Out of Scope. The author never makes this argument in the passage either.
(D): The Correct Answer
(E): Too specific. There is no direct connection between environmental cooperation and timber harvesting activities
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my posts helpful!

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national &nbs [#permalink] 07 Oct 2018, 21:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Once surrounded and protected by vast wilderness, many of the national

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.