Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 01:25 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 01:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
u2lover
Joined: 14 May 2006
Last visit: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Posts: 706
Kudos: 933
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
acfuture
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
Posts: 118
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ps_dahiya
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Last visit: 15 Oct 2019
Posts: 1,486
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Schools:Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Posts: 1,486
Kudos: 1,215
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shahnandan
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Last visit: 11 Jan 2013
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Location: Munich,Germany
Posts: 239
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
u2lover
One in 1,000 licensed traders will eventually be convicted of violation of the Securities and Exchange Act. Over the last five years, 8 of the 1,000 traders at Salamen, a top trading firm, have been convicted of such violations. This record clearly indicates that traders at Salamen are approximately 8 times as corrupt as traders at other trading firms.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Salamen hires from business schools with the highest quality of graduates and the most scrupulous standards.

B) The Securities and Exchange Commission is far more likely to investigate trading firms than other businesses.

C) A greater number of the Salamen employees with MBAs investigated for possible violations of the Securities and Exchange Act were cleared of all wrong-doing than were their counterparts at other trading firms.

D) Most of the employees of Salamen are scrupulously honest and would not intentionally act in such a way as to violate a regulation such as the Securities and Exchange Act.

E) The level of corruption of individuals on a staff is not directly related to the proportion of these individuals who have been convicted of corrupt behavior.

please explain


I go with E here.

The argument makes a connection with the number of people convicted with the level of corruption. I think C makes a specific reference to those with MBAs, but what about the other employees (non MBAs). Additionally, I also think this might even strengthen the argument because it reinforces the corelation between convictions and corruption.

E clearly states that there's simply no corelation. I might be wrong, please post your views.
User avatar
buzzgaurav
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Last visit: 22 Mar 2010
Posts: 354
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Posts: 354
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Leaning over E.
Choice is between C and E.
C seems less effective in weakening the argument by not accounting for Non-MBA's.
User avatar
Raghavender
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Last visit: 05 Nov 2013
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Location: Arkansas, US
GPA: 3.3
WE 1: 2.5 yrs in manufacturing
Posts: 125
Kudos: 125
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I wud go with E

Y not C: In this option, he's jus speakin about a small pool of employees,i.e; MBAs. So that cannot be applied for the whole population
User avatar
Yurik79
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Last visit: 01 Jun 2010
Posts: 316
Own Kudos:
Location: Madrid
Posts: 316
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Go E!
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Own Kudos:
Posts: 894
Kudos: 639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Will go with E.

Chose C after reading it but changed my mind after reading choice E and the passage.


"This record clearly indicates that traders at Salamen are approximately 8 times as corrupt as traders at other trading firms."

Note traders at Salamen are being compared with traders of other firms on the basis of 8 persons convicted of wrong doings.
E directly attacks this casual correlation.
avatar
workedupamigo
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Last visit: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Location: U to the... S to the A
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One in 1,000 licensed traders will eventually be convicted of violation of the Securities and Exchange Act. Over the last five years, 8 of the 1,000 traders at Salamen, a top trading firm, have been convicted of such violations. This record clearly indicates that traders at Salamen are approximately 8 times as corrupt as traders at other trading firms.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Salamen hires from business schools with the highest quality of graduates and the most scrupulous standards.

B) The Securities and Exchange Commission is far more likely to investigate trading firms than other businesses.

C) A greater number of the Salamen employees with MBAs investigated for possible violations of the Securities and Exchange Act were cleared of all wrong-doing than were their counterparts at other trading firms.

D) Most of the employees of Salamen are scrupulously honest and would not intentionally act in such a way as to violate a regulation such as the Securities and Exchange Act.

E) The level of corruption of individuals on a staff is not directly related to the proportion of these individuals who have been convicted of corrupt behavior.

A) Not relevant
B) There is no intended comparison btw traders and other businesses in the original argument, instead the comparison is btw traders @ Salamen and in other "trading" companies.
C) Defintely doesnt weaken the conclusion, instead seems to be in a way strengthening the conclusion by stating that the number of convictions is still 8 times that in other trading companies, inspite of many of the employees @ Salamen being exonerated evenutally.
D) Not Relevant
E) Correct. Even though the only one in 1,000 are said to be convicted "eventually" of corruption, could still mean, remaining corrupt people were just not convicted, say for lack of evidence. Doesnt digress and doesnt bring in extraneous reasons, unlike the case in options (A and D)
User avatar
paddyboy
Joined: 06 May 2006
Last visit: 27 Nov 2016
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 387
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E it is...

I didn't read all the choices at first and selected C :cry: Only realized when I compared notes with the others...
User avatar
acfuture
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Own Kudos:
Posts: 118
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
buzzgaurav
Leaning over E.
Choice is between C and E.
C seems less effective in weakening the argument by not accounting for Non-MBA's.


good point... did not think about the non-MBA's... :oops:
I did not think of it that way... though I did come down to C or E...
made the wrong answer choice.
User avatar
Path
Joined: 07 Aug 2005
Last visit: 24 Jan 2009
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Posts: 45
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I go with E.

C was close but deals with only MBA, but what about me:) I don't have that degree yet.
User avatar
haas_mba07
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Last visit: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 662
Own Kudos:
Posts: 662
Kudos: 216
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E) The level of corruption of individuals on a staff is not directly related to the proportion of these individuals who have been convicted of corrupt behavior.
User avatar
sharadGmat
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Last visit: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Posts: 177
Kudos: 969
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
u2lover
One in 1,000 licensed traders will eventually be convicted of violation of the Securities and Exchange Act. Over the last five years, 8 of the 1,000 traders at Salamen, a top trading firm, have been convicted of such violations. This record clearly indicates that traders at Salamen are approximately 8 times as corrupt as traders at other trading firms.

Which one of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?

A) Salamen hires from business schools with the highest quality of graduates and the most scrupulous standards.

B) The Securities and Exchange Commission is far more likely to investigate trading firms than other businesses.

C) A greater number of the Salamen employees with MBAs investigated for possible violations of the Securities and Exchange Act were cleared of all wrong-doing than were their counterparts at other trading firms.

D) Most of the employees of Salamen are scrupulously honest and would not intentionally act in such a way as to violate a regulation such as the Securities and Exchange Act.

E) The level of corruption of individuals on a staff is not directly related to the proportion of these individuals who have been convicted of corrupt behavior.

please explain



Straight E.. negate this premise and you will see that conclusion is strengthened..
User avatar
u2lover
Joined: 14 May 2006
Last visit: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
Posts: 706
Kudos: 933
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is E

nice explanations here!!!



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts