Bunuel
Ornithologists conditioned a flock of starlings to associate a series of musical soft chirps with the presence of a housecat. One and two days later, the ornithologists conducted tested the starlings, both individually and as a flock, to ascertain whether the birds retained the conditioning. Individually, the birds were significantly less likely to avoid areas where the soft chirps were being played. The ornithologists hypothesized that when the chirps were played, a starling that retained the conditioned association sounds an alarm that arouses the attention of the rest of the flock, retriggering the association in them and thereby making them avoid the sound.
The ornithologists' hypothesis requires which of the following assumptions?
A. The starlings do not produce soft chirps as alarm signals.
B. Before they were conditioned, the starlings would likely have found the chirps used in the experiment to be pleasant.
C. Starlings that did not avoid the musical soft chirps when tested individually were less likely than the other starlings to avoid the chirps when tested in a group.
D. Starlings that did not avoid the musical soft chirps when tested individually were not merely following other starlings' movements when tested in a flock.
E. A housecat was used during both the starlings' conditioning and the subsequent tests.
Experts' Global Explanation:
Mind-map: Starlings conditioned to associate musical chirps with a housecat à testing to determine retention of conditioning à starlings avoided musical chirps more in flock than individually à a starling retaining the conditioning gives off an alarm to other starlings for them to avoid musical soft chirps (conclusion)
Missing-link: Between starlings avoiding musical chirps more in flock than individually and the conclusion that a starling retaining the conditioning gives off an alarm to other starlings for them to avoid musical soft chirps
Expectation from the correct answer choice: To strengthen the conclusion that a starling retaining the conditioning gives off an alarm to other starlings for them to avoid musical soft chirps, through a valid assumption
A. The argument is concerned with a starling giving off an alarm to other starlings, and
not with the nature of the alarm; so, this answer choice simply adds detail and has no bearing on the reasoning or its conclusion. Besides, this condition
is not necessary for the argument to hold and thus, is not a valid assumption. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
B. Whether the starlings would likely have found the chirps used in the experiment to be pleasant has
no bearing on the argument or its conclusion. Besides, this condition
is not necessary for the argument to hold and thus, is not a valid assumption. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
C. Trap. By suggesting that the starlings that did not retain the conditioning were “less likely than others” to avoid musical chirps in a flock, this answer choice
contradicts the argument’s suggestion that once a starling gives off an alarm to other starlings, all starlings were “equally likely” to avoid musical chirps (and more likely than they would be in individual testing). Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
D.
Correct. By suggesting that the starlings that did not retain the conditioning
were not merely following other starlings’ movements in a group test, this answer choice
strengthens the conclusion that, in a flock, a starling retaining the conditioning gives off an alarm to other starlings for them to avoid musical soft chirps. Additionally, this statement
does have to be true for the conclusion to hold; negating this statement would mean that “starlings that did not avoid the musical soft chirps when tested individually were merely following other starlings' movements when tested in a flock”; such a suggestion casts doubt on one starling giving off an alarm to other starlings and thus, negates the conclusion. Because this answer choice strengthens the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is correct.
E. The use of a housecat in the later tests
casts doubt regarding
whether it was the housecat or the alarm by a fellow starling that made the starlings avoid musical chirps in a flock test; so, this answer choice, if anything,
weakens, rather than strengthens, the argument. Because this answer choice does not strengthen the conclusion through a valid assumption, this answer choice is incorrect.
D is the best choice.