Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:56 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
macjas
Joined: 09 May 2012
Last visit: 30 Jul 2015
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
9,987
 [46]
Given Kudos: 100
Affiliations: UWC
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE:Engineering (Media/Entertainment)
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
Posts: 308
Kudos: 9,987
 [46]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
38
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 327
Own Kudos:
622
 [7]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 327
Kudos: 622
 [7]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yashikaaggarwal
User avatar
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 3,086
Own Kudos:
3,102
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,510
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Internet and New Media)
Posts: 3,086
Kudos: 3,102
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Rishitha0311
Joined: 16 Nov 2023
Last visit: 17 Oct 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 190
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q90 V87 DI77
GPA: 8.67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
macjas
Project IR Butler 2019-20 - Get one IR Question Everyday
Question # 20, Date : 20-Oct-2019
This post is a part of Project IR Butler 2019-20. Click here for Details

Hi Bunuel

Can you please help with the 1st and second questions here?
User avatar
nisen20
Joined: 16 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 504
Posts: 94
Kudos: 340
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The answer to question 1 is not convincing.

Quote:
The executive director would rather change to a larger venue than risk exceeding the capacity of the currently-booked venue.
This intention is clearly indicated in Email 3: the director thinks they should change to a larger venue to avoid the opera's incidence.
What changed the director's mind? Nothing. He only replied in the email that well, if..., we should be fine. This is just a kind of provisional compromise, and cannot be interpreted as the final decision.

Quote:
The auction coordinator is certain that the charity has the necessary data to determine how many people to invite in order to maximize attendance while not exceeding the capacity limit.
The data is indicated in Email 2: 1,813 are invited and 1,378 attended. They predict a similar response and attendance rates this year.
Although no email is directly written by any charity staff, the fact that Email 1 was sended to charity staff but responded by auction coordinator shows us that the charity was absolutely involved and knew the contents in these emails. How can we say the charity does not have the necessary data?
User avatar
NoeticImbecile
Joined: 17 Feb 2024
Last visit: 24 Aug 2025
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 333
Posts: 68
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Apt0810
1-a) No, since the director is just thinking to increase the capacity and nothing is finalized.
b)Yes, the auction coordinator believes that the target is achievable
c) No, Nothing is shown that the auction coordinator is sure that he is having the complete data to get the results.

2- a) No, since there is no surity, it's based on assumptions
b) Amount per guest and per item are not mentioned,so we cannot say anything surely.
c)Yes- 100*1300+ (1098 - 10%of 1098( excluding servers/workers)*150 = 278200

3) (250000-(1500*100))/((1098 - 10%of 1098( excluding servers/workers)) ~ 100

Posted from my mobile device
­RO1, S1: "Maybe we should think about moving to a larger venue so we make sure that we don’t exceed the capacity limit. Last Saturday night, the opera’s benefit gala was almost shut down because they had too many people". clearly he has an inclination of changing the venue in case the capacity gets exceeded and also provides a reason (opera was shut down). Further, even the statement uses the word 'would', that is, "The executive director WOULD rather change to a larger venue than risk exceeding the capacity of the currently-booked venue". This means it is a probabilty and not a certainty. Sajjad1994 chetan2u or any expert please help where am i wrong in my understanding
User avatar
RiyaJ0032
Joined: 13 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Posts: 200
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes, even I have the same doubt.
The replies earlier regarding Q1)A) claim that we cannot tell with surety whether the director will change to a larger venue or not
But the Q is not about making a choice b/w larger venue and the current venue

Rather it's asking if given a choice b/w larger venue and a venue that exceeds the capacity, what would the director choose

It is very evident from the tabs that the director does not support exceeding the capacity

The last sentence in tab 3 "Well, if our projections are accurate, we should be fine at this venue" is made because the director believes she will not exceed the capacity.

So all this hints to one thing - the director does not want to exceed the capacity and would any day choose a larger venue if she believes it does not suffice the needed capacity
NoeticImbecile
Apt0810
1-a) No, since the director is just thinking to increase the capacity and nothing is finalized.
b)Yes, the auction coordinator believes that the target is achievable
c) No, Nothing is shown that the auction coordinator is sure that he is having the complete data to get the results.

2- a) No, since there is no surity, it's based on assumptions
b) Amount per guest and per item are not mentioned,so we cannot say anything surely.
c)Yes- 100*1300+ (1098 - 10%of 1098( excluding servers/workers)*150 = 278200

3) (250000-(1500*100))/((1098 - 10%of 1098( excluding servers/workers)) ~ 100

Posted from my mobile device
­RO1, S1: "Maybe we should think about moving to a larger venue so we make sure that we don’t exceed the capacity limit. Last Saturday night, the opera’s benefit gala was almost shut down because they had too many people". clearly he has an inclination of changing the venue in case the capacity gets exceeded and also provides a reason (opera was shut down). Further, even the statement uses the word 'would', that is, "The executive director WOULD rather change to a larger venue than risk exceeding the capacity of the currently-booked venue". This means it is a probabilty and not a certainty. Sajjad1994 chetan2u or any expert please help where am i wrong in my understanding
User avatar
cheshire
User avatar
DI Forum Moderator
Joined: 26 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 271
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 271
Kudos: 256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would argue it's still no because the director is still taking a risk by relying on estimated projections. They still run the risk (even if it's small) of exceeding capacity yet remain at the smaller venue.
RiyaJ0032
Yes, even I have the same doubt.
The replies earlier regarding Q1)A) claim that we cannot tell with surety whether the director will change to a larger venue or not
But the Q is not about making a choice b/w larger venue and the current venue

Rather it's asking if given a choice b/w larger venue and a venue that exceeds the capacity, what would the director choose

It is very evident from the tabs that the director does not support exceeding the capacity

The last sentence in tab 3 "Well, if our projections are accurate, we should be fine at this venue" is made because the director believes she will not exceed the capacity.

So all this hints to one thing - the director does not want to exceed the capacity and would any day choose a larger venue if she believes it does not suffice the needed capacity