It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 19:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# oxygen

Author Message
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1261

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 04:41
Attachments

oxygen.JPG [ 103.53 KiB | Viewed 1485 times ]

SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2473

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 08:13
ritula wrote:

E. I would go with E.
Superoxy doesnot add anything extra value. Tap water does the samething what superoxy does.
_________________

Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html

GT

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 428
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 09:42
Premise1:- One of the limiting factors is the amount of oxygen absorbed by muscles from bloodstream
Entrepreneurs have started selling Water X, which has more oxygen than does normal water
Conclusion:- Water X is useless
Reason:- Amount of oxygen in the blood of person who is exercising is already more than the muscle cells can absorb
This is supporting the conclusion that Selling Water X is useless. We need to find an answer choice that does the same

a)Does not support the argument( this choice is only about world class athletes)
b)Accepting this as true will not mean selling Water X would be useless
c)If lungs are the only means through which oxygen can be absorbed then consumption of water X would indeed be useless
d)No one is denying this..argument itself states that lack of oxygen is one of the limiting factors...
e)If the water lost can be replaced with ordinary tap water, so be it. There is no discussion of oxygen, limiting factors....hence this is not relevant to the argument

I'll go with C

Cheers,
Unplugged
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1548

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 12:02
I went for C. This actually supports the conclusion the same way as the boldface does in the argument.
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2008
Posts: 199

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2009, 22:43
ritula wrote:

i will go for D.

Premise clearly says that "one of the limiting factor of the human physical performance is the amount of oxygen absorbed by muscles from bloodstream.

But the Entrepreneurs misinterpreted it and started to sell water with more dissolved oxygen.

The conclusion says that the Entrepreneurs' idea is useless. COz the less oxygen content is not the only reason for "the limiting factor of the human physical performance"
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1261

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 02:39
OA is C
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 488
Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 14:30
yes, agree with C

what's the function of the bold part? this part makes the water with extra O2 useless...

The only answer that makes such water useless is C

Cheers
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 545

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2009, 22:32
Agree with C, however, what is wrong with E?
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1548

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2009, 01:18
Agree with C, however, what is wrong with E?

E does not support the conclusion. So what if the lost water can be replaced with ordinary tap water? Still, SuperOXY may be useful.
Re: oxygen   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2009, 01:18
Display posts from previous: Sort by