shivamidolboy1 wrote:
Hi
GMATNinja,
In option (c), "Unlike those of the United States, where farmers can usually depend on rain or snow all year long, most parts of Sri Lanka's rains"
"those of" can refer to most parts of Sri Lanka's rain, right?
Putting it back in the sentence and we get "Unlike most parts of Sri Lanka's rains of the United States, where farmers can usually depend on rain or snow all year long, most parts of Sri Lanka's rains"
And this does not make sense and therefore we reject it. Basically, those of can refer to the entire noun modifier? Instead of just the first noun it encounters?
Interesting question! I think it's fair to say that when we see "those of" in the context of a comparison, we're talking about two different entities. Consider a simplified version of the usage:
Unlike Tim's groceries, those of Dana contain items other than Twinkies and Nutella.
Not the world's most elegant sentence, but it seems to compare Tim's groceries to the
groceries of Dana, rather than, say, comparing Tim's groceries to Tim's groceries of Dana. In other words, "those" is a clue that we're going to reference someone else's groceries, so I wouldn't say this usage is wrong.
However, the answer choice you've referenced contains a much more conspicuous error. Even if we argue that "those" simply refers to "parts of," the comparison seems to be between "parts of the United States" and "parts of Sri Lanka's rains." What could that possibly mean? Comparing the Rocky Mountains to a fragment of some raindrops in Sri Lanka? That would be illogical, to say the least.
So we don't have to worry about whether "those" is correct in isolation. There's no way to interpret this sentence in a way that makes sense, so it's out.
I hope that helps!