Sajjad1994Please rate my essay and give me some tips for improvement.
Prompt:
The following appeared in the health section of a magazine on trends and lifestyles:
“People who use the artificial sweetener aspartame are better off consuming sugar, since aspartame can actually contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss. For example, high levels of aspartame have been shown to trigger a craving for food by depleting the brain of a chemical that registers satiety, or the sense of being full. Furthermore, studies suggest that sugars, if consumed after at least 45 minutes of continuous exercise, actually enhance the body’s ability to burn fat. Consequently, those who drink aspartame-sweetened juices after exercise will also lose this calorie-burning benefit. Thus it appears that people consuming aspartame rather than sugar are unlikely to achieve their dietary goals.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
Essay-
The argument claims that the people who consumes Artificial Sweetener Aspartame (ASA) are unlikely to achieve their dietary goals and recommends that the people must switch from ASA to sugar. The conclusion is flawed as there is lack of evidence and data in support of the claim and it readily assumes the scope for all people without considering that the purpose of different people for consuming ASA may differ. The argument is subjected to debate on grounds of many unstated assumptions which the author considered while concluding.
First, the argument begins with people who consume ASA should switch to sugar as ASA contribute to weight gain. By stating so the author is restricting the customer base- The people who are willing to gain the weight should purchase ASA as it guarantees the weight gain. On the other hand, it should be considered that everyone consuming ASA is not targeting at weight reduction. There may be some proportion of the consumers who switched from Sugar to ASA because of the medical terms. The argument could have been much clearer if it emphasis on certain category of consumers- only those people who are targeting at weight loss.
Second, the high levels of ASA result in frequent food desires by depleting the brain of a chemical that registers satiety. The argument explicitly mentioned the high level of ASA, there is no reasoning provided for consuming high level of ASA and no details of “High” levels of ASA. It is possible that people know the effects of consuming more than permissible limit of ASA and accordingly they consume ASA well below those levels.
Third, the sugar is consumed after 45 minutes of exercise enhances the body’s ability to burn the fat while there is comparison of drinking juice containing ASA just after exercise. ASA may also behave in same or better way if consumed after 45 minutes. Recommendation for the consumption of ASA can be derived better if the comparison is on the same basis.
In conclusion, the argument is not concrete and cannot sustain in absence of above considerations. It could be considerably strengthened if the author mentioned the reason behind the high level of ASA consumption and compare the effects of both on body's fat on same grounds.