Kushchokhani
mikemcgarry
RaghavSingla
People with schizophrenia experience miscarriages at a higher rate of frequency than people without schizophrenia, whose overactive immune systems tend to be indiscriminately rejecting the foreign DNA of the fetus.
A- People with schizophrenia experience miscarriages at a higher rate of frequency than people without schizophrenia, whose overactive immune systems tend to be indiscriminately rejecting
B- Miscarriages are more common among people with schizophrenia than among people without schizophrenia, being that their overactive immune systems tend to indiscriminately reject
C- Miscarriages are more common between people with schizophrenia than they are between people without schizophrenia, because the overactive immune systems of people with schizophrenia tend to be indiscriminately rejecting
D- The miscarriage rate of people with schizophrenia is higher than the rate for people without schizophrenia because the former's overactive immune systems tend to reject
E- People with schizophrenia have more common miscarriages than do people without schizophrenia, because their immune systems tend to indiscriminately reject
The official answer for this question is D. Is the use 'miscarriage rate "of" people' in choice D correct? Shouldn't it be rate "among" people ? I doubt the official answer.
Dear
RaghavSingla,
I'm happy to respond.
To be honest, I am not a big fan of this question. Technically, the meaning of the prompt is different from the meaning in most of the answer choices, including the OA. We can figure out what the prompt is trying to say, especially if we happen to know a little about neurobiology, but such expertise should not be required. Also, in (D), I think "
former" should refer to the first term, which is a miscarriage rate, not a group of people: there is something awkward about referent of that word.
I don't think the word "
of" is problematic.
The miscarriage rate of people with schizophrenia . . .
The miscarriage rate among people with schizophrenia . . .
The miscarriage rate for people with schizophrenia . . . All of those would be correct. This is the tricky think about idiomatic constructions: sometimes only one thing is correct and all others are incorrect, and other times, there are multiple correct options. It depends on circumstances.
Here's a much higher quality SC practice question:
With American cryptanalystsDoes all this make sense?
Mike

Hi
mikemcgarry DmitryFarber KarishmaB ExpertsGlobal5 AjiteshArun ryanstarr ReedArnoldMPREPAs per
MGMAT's SC Guide on Idioms, "rate of" is used in case of speed/frequency whereas "rates for" is used in case of prices. It further states that the opposite usage is wrong. Accordingly, option D should ideally contain "rate of" at both the places, thereby making choice E better than D for the pronoun "their" in E should logically refer to the subject of the previous clause which is correct. IMO the mistake "more common miscarriages" in choice E is preferred over the mistake "rate for" in choice D as GMAT is more strict with Idioms (Idioms are mathematical- either correct or incorrect although
MGMAT also specifies Suspect in its Guide).
Hi
RaghavSinglaCan you post OE of this ques?
For what it's worth, I'd disagree most with this proposition: GMAT is more strict with Idioms (Idioms are mathematical- either correct or incorrect although
MGMAT also specifies Suspect in its Guide).
There are some cases in which the GMAT is strict with idioms, and as such some idiom issues are basically mathematical. However, even as a native speaker, I won't make a decision on an idiom issue until I've exhausted just about every other option in the answers. The reason is basically that the GMAT isn't reliable or consistent on idioms (just as it isn't super reliable on comma usage). Indeed, the GMAT subverts its own idioms left and right. For instance, in one old question, it justifies the right answer by claiming that
estimated at is an incorrect idiom for talking about ages etc. and that
at should only be used if we want to talk about where the estimation takes place. Then, in another question, it uses
estimated at in the non-underlined portion. Another decent example (in the current OG) is the Argentine ant question, in which the phrase
consider all their fellows to be close relatives appears in the correct answer despite the fact that [i]consider X Y (that is, without
to be)is nominally the correct idiom. Basically, the GMAT itself doesn't always respect its established idioms.
The other reason I don't take idioms seriously is simply that through experience, I've found other things more reliable. For instance, the phrase
more common miscarriages is unequivocally a modifier issue, making the miscarriages themselves seem common (that is, ordinary) rather than correctly making the
having of miscarriages seem common (that is, frequent). Modifier/meaning issues are definitely prioritized by the GMAT. And as to the pronoun issue in (E), it's sort of a mixed bag. If the pronoun were in the nominative case rather than possessive (that is, if it were
they rather than
their), I'd agree that it unambiguously referred to the subject of the previous clause, as in this case the pronoun would
also be acting as a subject. As it's written, though, (D) has a clear advantage in being totally unambiguous.
So my ultimate mathematical analysis would be this:
(D) has an idiom issue. That's -1 for (D). (Though for my part, I'd subjectively give (D) a -0.5 for that idiom issue, because again, I tend to discount idiom issues based on their unreliability.)
(E) has a modifier/meaning issue and a pronoun issue. That's at least -1.5 for (E).
As such, I'd happily pick (D) over (E).