Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
rvgmat12
Joined: 19 Oct 2014
Last visit: 27 Mar 2026
Posts: 352
Given Kudos: 189
Location: United Arab Emirates
Schools: Wharton '23 Booth '23 INSEAD Jan'21 Intake
Products:
16 Aug 2021, 03:41
Kudos
Bookmarks
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
72% (01:44) correct
28%
(01:52)
wrong
based on 300
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Peraski: Although driving gas-guzzling automobiles produces a greater level of pollution than driving smaller cars, those of us who drive smaller cars when we could use a bicycle cannot speak out against the use of gas guzzlers. We would be revealing our hypocrisy.
Jackson: I acknowledge I could do better in this area. But, it would be worse not to speak out against greater sources of pollution just because I am being hypocritical.
The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Peraski and Jackson disagree over whether
(A) driving a gas-guzzling automobile produces a greater level of pollution than driving a smaller car
(B) speaking out against the use of gas guzzlers despite driving in situations in which one could use a bicycle reveals hypocrisy
(C) driving even a small car when one could use a bicycle contributes to the level of pollution
(D) one should speak out against polluting even if doing so reveals one’s own hypocrisy
(E) there is no moral difference between driving a gas guzzler and driving a smaller car
Jackson: I acknowledge I could do better in this area. But, it would be worse not to speak out against greater sources of pollution just because I am being hypocritical.
The dialogue provides the most support for the claim that Peraski and Jackson disagree over whether
(A) driving a gas-guzzling automobile produces a greater level of pollution than driving a smaller car
(B) speaking out against the use of gas guzzlers despite driving in situations in which one could use a bicycle reveals hypocrisy
(C) driving even a small car when one could use a bicycle contributes to the level of pollution
(D) one should speak out against polluting even if doing so reveals one’s own hypocrisy
(E) there is no moral difference between driving a gas guzzler and driving a smaller car
TheGraceful
20 Aug 2021, 04:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
B and D are close and I ended with B.
Can you please justify how D supersedes B...?
Can you please justify how D supersedes B...?
20 Aug 2021, 12:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
TheGraceful
(B) talks about "revealing hypocrisy". It tells whether hypocrisy would be revealed or not? But the author tells that both the subjects agree that hypocrisy is there and willfully admits it, against (B), which stills asks acceptance of hypocrisy is still the question between the subjects.
