GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2018, 19:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

General GMAT Forum Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 960
Location: India
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2017, 01:46
1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

52% (01:12) correct 48% (01:14) wrong based on 155 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would have walked into the room and seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes torn as if he had been attacked.

A. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes torn
B. saw a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes were torn
C. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, with clothes torn
D. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes were torn
E. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes have torn

_________________

If you liked my post, kindly give me a Kudos. Thanks.

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2017, 13:20
2
rohan2345 wrote:
Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would have walked into the room and seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes torn as if he had been attacked.

A. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes torn
B. saw a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes were torn
C. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, with clothes torn
D. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes were torn
E. seen a stabbed man crouching on the sofa, whose clothes have torn

Dear rohan2345,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I don't have a high opinion of this question. The topic is not at all like what would appear on the GMAT: rather than from an academic source, it appears to be from a thriller detective novel. Also, the structure of the SC question is very formulaic and cookbook.

Split #1: verb parallelism
we have "would have walked into the room and _____." For correct parallelism, we need "seen." Choice (B) is wrong.

What happens after the comma:
If we have the pronoun "whose," then we are starting a full clause, and need a full verb. Choice (A) just has a participle: that's incorrect. Choice (E) has the present perfect sentence, which doesn't fit in context: that choice is wrong. (D) handles this perfectly correctly.

The problem is: (C) is also perfectly correct grammatically. It's really hard to say which one, (C) or (D), is better. Whoever designed this question created a distractor that winds up being perfectly correct. This is a very poorly designed question.

If this question comes from a book, then the best thing you could do for your GMAT preparation would be to soak the book in gasoline and set it on fire.

Here's a high quality GMAT SC practice question.
What the eye sees

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 12 Nov 2017
Posts: 105
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2017, 09:04
mikemcgarry here is "whose" referring to the sofa?
I guess better answer would be C.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4094
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2017, 09:11
ImAnkitKaushik wrote:
mikemcgarry here is "whose" referring to the sofa?
I guess better answer would be C.


Whose can be used for people, animals or things, however here whose refers to the man
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 12 Nov 2017
Posts: 105
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2017, 09:16
Abhishek009 wrote:
ImAnkitKaushik wrote:
mikemcgarry here is "whose" referring to the sofa?
I guess better answer would be C.


Whose can be used for people, animals or things, however here whose refers to the man


If "whose" can refer to things, then how we will know that "whose" is referring to the man?
"Sofa does not have clothes" > will this help us?
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2017, 11:14
2
ImAnkitKaushik wrote:
Abhishek009 wrote:
ImAnkitKaushik wrote:
mikemcgarry here is "whose" referring to the sofa?
I guess better answer would be C.


Whose can be used for people, animals or things, however here whose refers to the man


If "whose" can refer to things, then how we will know that "whose" is referring to the man?
"Sofa does not have clothes" > will this help us?

Dear ImAnkitKaushik,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

First of all, keep in mind that this is a low quality SC question. The grammar in this question is atrocious: this question was written by somebody who does not understand English well. It's an absolute embarrassment.

The word "whose" is a pronoun, a relative pronoun. It begins a kind of dependent clause known as a relative clause, a particularly type of noun-modifying clause, and the antecedent of the pronoun "whose" is the target noun of the clause.

The relationship of pronoun-antecedent is very subtle, and involves factors at many levels, as is the relationship between target noun & noun modifier. The Modifier Touch Rule is a general pattern, but it has several regular exceptions. Here, the most germane exception has to do with vital noun modifiers.

Finally, my friend, remember that there is no way to arrive at GMAT SC mastery by memorizing rules. Many of the "how can we know?" questions are not answered by rules, but by deeper reflection as well as by one's intuition for the language. A non-native speaker can begin to develop this intuition only by pursuing a rigorous habit of reading. See:
How to Improve Your GMAT Verbal Score

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 12 Nov 2017
Posts: 105
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2017, 11:38
mikemcgarry wrote:
First of all, keep in mind that this is a low quality SC question.


Thanks mikemcgarry
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would &nbs [#permalink] 11 Dec 2017, 11:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Person without any prior knowledge of the circumstances would

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.