Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 12:47 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 12:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
805+ (Hard)|   Non-Math Related|               
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Feb 2026
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
22,953
 [54]
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 273
Kudos: 22,953
 [54]
Kudos
Add Kudos
54
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,848
Own Kudos:
7,111
 [5]
Given Kudos: 212
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,848
Kudos: 7,111
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,442
Own Kudos:
79,404
 [5]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,442
Kudos: 79,404
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
harshchougule
Joined: 26 Sep 2023
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 26
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
Explanation

Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.

In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.

Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.


We see that the philosophy student's argument begins with its conclusion:

    Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.

Key support for that conclusion comes from this portion of the argument:

    Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.

We see that the philosophy student has jumped from the idea that "an object ... may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication," to the idea that "Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion," and then to the conclusion "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful."

Notice that the philosophy student has not justified those jumps. Rather, the philosophy student has simply asserted that "such an object would be ugly" and thus "may not be ... truly beautiful," as if the definition of "ugly" is "has subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication."

In other words, the philosophy student has defined "ugly" or "not truly beautiful" as "having shortcomings that SOMEONE would see."

Let's now go to the answer choices.

is considered beautiful by everyone

We are looking for a principle on which the argument relies.

So, this choice is unlikely to be correct since the idea that an object "is considered beautiful by everyone" cannot logically play a role in supporting the conclusion "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful."

After all, the conclusion is about objects that are considered beautiful by only some people, "everyone who has observed them," and no part of the argument involves objects "considered beautiful by everyone."

is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws

The argument does not involve objects "not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers." Rather, it's about objects that "are appreciated by many people" but "have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers."

So, it appears unlikely that this choice will work.

would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers

This choice is likely to work since the argument is about an object that "may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication."

is not truly beautiful

This choice is likely to work since the conclusion of the argument is about objects that "may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.."

is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers

The argument does not involve objects "not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers." Rather, it's about objects that "are appreciated by many people" but "have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers."

So, it appears unlikely that this choice will work.

Our two best choices are "would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers" and "is not truly beautiful."

If we drop them into the blanks in the sentence we have to complete, we get the following:

In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful.

We see that, completed in that way, the sentence does indeed state a principle on which the argument relies. After all, in making the jump from "an object ... may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication" to the idea that "Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion," and finally to the conclusion that "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful," the philosophy student has relied on the principle that "In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful."

Correct Answer: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, is not truly beautiful
­

What is wrong with the answer
(1) if an object is not truely beautiful
(2) then it would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers,??

I am making same mistake over and over again i am able to to the final answer but then when it ccomes to order i am messing up, what am i doing wrong??
User avatar
sachi-in
Joined: 12 Oct 2023
Last visit: 07 Apr 2026
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
338
 [1]
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 120
Kudos: 338
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
harshchougule


What is wrong with the answer
(1) if an object is not truely beautiful
(2) then it would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers,??

I am making same mistake over and over again i am able to to the final answer but then when it ccomes to order i am messing up, what am i doing wrong??
­


Cheers ! We both made same mistake !

Well the reasoning provided by the philosopher is (1 - No object is truly beautiful ) because of the principle (2 - some hypothetically perfect level of sophistication in an observer will find some flaws ) . (2) is the evidence and (1) conclusion in simple terms.

2 is necesscary condition for 1
but
1 is not necesscary condition for 2
­

So the principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies is that:

If (2 - some hypothetically perfect level of sophisticated observer finds flaws ) happens then (1 - Object is not truly beautiful ) should happen.

Why not the other way around ?
It's not the other way around If (1 - Object is not truly beautiful ) happens then (2 - some hypothetically perfect level of sophisticated observer finds flaws ) must happen

Imagine this Even if a person with lower level of sophistication can find flaws that will render the object less beautiful too
User avatar
SatvikVedala
Joined: 03 Oct 2022
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 168
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 51
Posts: 168
Kudos: 133
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi

This looks similar to a CR Question. Recommend everyone to try the CR Question too.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-violin-con ... 86435.html

The concept in the CR question is contra positivity but here its is mostly deriving/arriving at conclusion

-it's Satvik-­
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 5,632
Own Kudos:
33,433
 [1]
Given Kudos: 707
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,632
Kudos: 33,433
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's break down what the philosophy student is really arguing:

The main conclusion is: Objects considered beautiful by everyone may not actually be truly beautiful.

Now, here's the key reasoning chain you need to follow:

  1. Sophisticated observers can spot flaws that regular people miss
  2. But even sophisticated observers have limitations
  3. Therefore, hypothetical even more sophisticated observers might find currently "beautiful" objects hideous
  4. If these super-sophisticated observers would find it hideous, then it's truly ugly (not beautiful)

Here's what you need to see: The argument is establishing that the aesthetic judgment of hypothetical super-sophisticated observers determines true beauty or ugliness. That's the underlying principle.

Now let's match this to the if-then structure:

The question asks: "If an object 1___, then that object 2___"

Part 1 (the condition): What triggers the principle?
Look at the argument's key move - it's when an object "would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication." That's your Choice C for Part 1.

Part 2 (the consequence): What follows from that condition?
If those super-sophisticated observers would find it hideous, then the object "is not truly beautiful." That's your Choice D for Part 2.

Together, the principle reads: "If an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful."

This is exactly what the argument assumes - that hypothetical super-sophisticated judgment = objective aesthetic truth.

Why not the other choices?

Choice A ("is considered beautiful by everyone") might seem tempting because it's mentioned in the passage, but notice that the argument isn't saying universal approval leads to true beauty. Rather, it's saying hypothetical sophisticated disapproval determines true ugliness.

Choice B talks about what "most observers" think, but the core principle isn't about actual observers - it's specifically about hypothetical super-sophisticated ones.

Choice E brings in unsophisticated observers, but the argument doesn't establish any principle about them.

Answer: Part 1 = C, Part 2 = D

---

While this explanation walks you through this specific question, understanding the systematic framework for identifying principles in CR arguments - especially distinguishing between stated premises vs. assumed logical bridges - is crucial for consistent accuracy. You can check out the complete solution framework on Neuron by e-GMAT to master how to systematically deconstruct arguments and identify underlying principles. You can also explore detailed solutions for other GMAT official questions on Neuron with comprehensive explanations and analytics to strengthen your CR skills.

Hope this helps!
User avatar
haianh
Joined: 29 Oct 2020
Last visit: 02 Apr 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 80
Posts: 45
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here’s a simpler version of the problem above:

Some objects that everyone finds beautiful might not actually be truly beautiful (1). Certain flaws can only be seen by the most perceptive observers. But even they, limited by their own understanding, might miss flaws that hypothetical observers with greater insight could notice (2).
  • Conclusion (1)
  • Premise (2)

Logic:
  • In general, (2) thus (1) = if more advanced observers would find flaws that current observers cannot, then the object is not truly beautiful.

Solution:
  • If an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109820 posts
498 posts
212 posts