Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
10 Sep 2023, 07:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
1: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
2: is not truly beautiful
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
32% (01:56) correct
68%
(02:16)
wrong
based on 1290
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.
Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.
Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
ID: 700264
| 1 | 2 | |
| is considered beautiful by everyone | ||
| is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws | ||
| would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers | ||
| is not truly beautiful | ||
| is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
1: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
2: is not truly beautiful
18 Oct 2023, 08:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
Explanation
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.
Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
We see that the philosophy student's argument begins with its conclusion:
Key support for that conclusion comes from this portion of the argument:
We see that the philosophy student has jumped from the idea that "an object ... may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication," to the idea that "Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion," and then to the conclusion "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful."
Notice that the philosophy student has not justified those jumps. Rather, the philosophy student has simply asserted that "such an object would be ugly" and thus "may not be ... truly beautiful," as if the definition of "ugly" is "has subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication."
In other words, the philosophy student has defined "ugly" or "not truly beautiful" as "having shortcomings that SOMEONE would see."
Let's now go to the answer choices.
is considered beautiful by everyone
We are looking for a principle on which the argument relies.
So, this choice is unlikely to be correct since the idea that an object "is considered beautiful by everyone" cannot logically play a role in supporting the conclusion "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful."
After all, the conclusion is about objects that are considered beautiful by only some people, "everyone who has observed them," and no part of the argument involves objects "considered beautiful by everyone."
is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws
The argument does not involve objects "not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers." Rather, it's about objects that "are appreciated by many people" but "have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers."
So, it appears unlikely that this choice will work.
would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
This choice is likely to work since the argument is about an object that "may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication."
is not truly beautiful
This choice is likely to work since the conclusion of the argument is about objects that "may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.."
is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers
The argument does not involve objects "not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers." Rather, it's about objects that "are appreciated by many people" but "have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers."
So, it appears unlikely that this choice will work.
Our two best choices are "would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers" and "is not truly beautiful."
If we drop them into the blanks in the sentence we have to complete, we get the following:
In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful.
We see that, completed in that way, the sentence does indeed state a principle on which the argument relies. After all, in making the jump from "an object ... may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication" to the idea that "Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion," and finally to the conclusion that "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful," the philosophy student has relied on the principle that "In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful."
Correct Answer: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, is not truly beautiful
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.
Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
We see that the philosophy student's argument begins with its conclusion:
- Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.
Key support for that conclusion comes from this portion of the argument:
- Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
We see that the philosophy student has jumped from the idea that "an object ... may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication," to the idea that "Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion," and then to the conclusion "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful."
Notice that the philosophy student has not justified those jumps. Rather, the philosophy student has simply asserted that "such an object would be ugly" and thus "may not be ... truly beautiful," as if the definition of "ugly" is "has subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication."
In other words, the philosophy student has defined "ugly" or "not truly beautiful" as "having shortcomings that SOMEONE would see."
Let's now go to the answer choices.
is considered beautiful by everyone
We are looking for a principle on which the argument relies.
So, this choice is unlikely to be correct since the idea that an object "is considered beautiful by everyone" cannot logically play a role in supporting the conclusion "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful."
After all, the conclusion is about objects that are considered beautiful by only some people, "everyone who has observed them," and no part of the argument involves objects "considered beautiful by everyone."
is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws
The argument does not involve objects "not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers." Rather, it's about objects that "are appreciated by many people" but "have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers."
So, it appears unlikely that this choice will work.
would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
This choice is likely to work since the argument is about an object that "may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication."
is not truly beautiful
This choice is likely to work since the conclusion of the argument is about objects that "may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.."
is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers
The argument does not involve objects "not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers." Rather, it's about objects that "are appreciated by many people" but "have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers."
So, it appears unlikely that this choice will work.
Our two best choices are "would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers" and "is not truly beautiful."
If we drop them into the blanks in the sentence we have to complete, we get the following:
In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful.
We see that, completed in that way, the sentence does indeed state a principle on which the argument relies. After all, in making the jump from "an object ... may have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication" to the idea that "Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion," and finally to the conclusion that "Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful," the philosophy student has relied on the principle that "In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful."
Correct Answer: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, is not truly beautiful
31 Aug 2024, 23:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
MartyMurray
What is wrong with the answer
(1) if an object is not truely beautiful
(2) then it would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers,??
I am making same mistake over and over again i am able to to the final answer but then when it ccomes to order i am messing up, what am i doing wrong??
