chetan2u wrote:
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
In general, if an object
___1___, then that object
___2___.
Select for
1 and for
2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
This is what he says: an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.
This is the student's opinion. What is the principle he is using?
That if an object would appear hideous to some hypothetical sophisticated observers, then the object is not beautiful.
If X, then Y.
He says that if X happened, then Y will be true. He is concluding Y. He is concluding that then that object is not truly beautiful.
Hence X -
an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observersY -
that object is not truly beautifulANSWER - 3rd and 4th sentencesQuote:
Options B and E
If an object
is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws then that object
is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers.It seems to me that both B and E are saying similar things. Also, this may be true but is it the principle of the argument of the student? No. The student is not concerned with objects that are ugly to most people. He is concerned with objects that most people find beautiful. This is certainly not the principle he is using for his argument.