Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:15 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:15
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
guddo
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 30 Oct 2025
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
8,663
 [28]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 360
Kudos: 8,663
 [28]
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 29 Feb 2024, 20:53
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide Answer
Hide
Show
History
1: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers 2: is not truly beautiful
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

42% (02:12) correct 58% (02:43) wrong based on 708 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.

In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.

Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
1 2
is considered beautiful by everyone
is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws
would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
is not truly beautiful
is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers
Submit Answer
Start the Timer above, select the radio buttons, and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
1: would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers 2: is not truly beautiful
User avatar
Elite097
User avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
553
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Location: India
Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27
GPA: 3.64
Schools: Sloan '25 Columbia '27 Haas '27
Posts: 771
Kudos: 553
 [1]
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 08 Mar 2024, 09:07
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB GMATCoachBen i marked in reverse so pls explain how to go about this nd also please explain the other answer choices : B and E
User avatar
manasp35
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Jun 2024
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
70
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 30
Kudos: 70
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever Updated on: 09 Mar 2024, 02:59
Originally posted by manasp35 on 08 Mar 2024, 23:09.
Last edited by manasp35 on 09 Mar 2024, 02:59, edited 1 time in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Elite097
i marked in reverse so pls explain how to go about this nd also please explain the other answer choices : B and E
Show more
­Elite097  this is find the assumption based like question. there is a gap : how hypothetical scenario is connected to real world ? 
statement : Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
support : an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication
Fill the gap between having flaw to object being ugly. 
In general, if an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful
 ­
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,989
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,989
 [4]
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 09 Mar 2024, 02:37
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
­Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.
Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.
Show more
This is what he says: an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.
This is the student's opinion. What is the principle he is using?
That if an object would appear hideous to some hypothetical sophisticated observers, then the object is not beautiful.
If X, then Y.
He says that if X happened, then Y will be true. He is concluding Y. He is concluding that then that object is not truly beautiful.
Hence X - an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
Y - that object is not truly beautiful­
ANSWER - 3rd and 4th sentences
Quote:
Options B and E
Show more
If an object is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws then that object is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers.
It seems to me that both B and E are saying similar things. Also, this may be true but is it the principle of the argument of the student? No. The student is not concerned with objects that are ugly to most people. He is concerned with objects that most people find beautiful. This is certainly not the principle he is using for his argument. ­
User avatar
thenerdycat
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
10
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V82 DI75
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V82 DI75
Posts: 15
Kudos: 10
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 21 Mar 2024, 00:31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?
User avatar
manasp35
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Jun 2024
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
70
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 30
Kudos: 70
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 21 Mar 2024, 00:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
thenerdycat
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?
Show more
­Say for example, an object is truly beautiful. 

Now, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone,
then can we say "that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers " ? 

if its truly beautiful, then the object would appear beautiful to hypothetical observers as well. Right?
User avatar
thenerdycat
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
10
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V82 DI75
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V82 DI75
Posts: 15
Kudos: 10
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 21 Mar 2024, 01:00
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manasp35

thenerdycat
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?
­Say for example, an object is truly beautiful. 

Now, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone,
then can we say "that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers " ? 

if its truly beautiful, then the object would appear beautiful to hypothetical observers as well. Right?
Show more
­Okay, when you are referring to "everyone", we are also considering "hypothetical observers" as well. I was under the assumption that everyone refers to actual realistic people, and hypothetical observers as separate entity.

Anyway, now it makes sense - thank you! :)
User avatar
manasp35
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Jun 2024
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
70
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 30
Kudos: 70
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 21 Mar 2024, 01:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thenerdycat

manasp35

thenerdycat
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?
­Say for example, an object is truly beautiful. 

Now, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone,
then can we say "that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers " ? 

if its truly beautiful, then the object would appear beautiful to hypothetical observers as well. Right?
­Okay, when you are referring to "everyone", we are also considering "hypothetical observers" as well. I was under the assumption that everyone refers to actual realistic people, and hypothetical observers as separate entity.

 
Show more
We don't know whether "everyone" is including hypothetical. Even if it is not including hypothetical, the statement ­

In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers

is still incorrect.

if an object is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people), it could mean two things


1. the object is not beautiful but is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people) . Meaning it has flaws. In this case hypothetical ones will find it ugly. (here statement is valid.)

2. the object is actually beautiful. In this case, hypothetical ones will also find it beautiful. (here statement is not valid.)

 ­
User avatar
thenerdycat
User avatar
Joined: 19 Aug 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
10
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V82 DI75
GMAT Focus 1: 595 Q81 V82 DI75
Posts: 15
Kudos: 10
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 21 Mar 2024, 08:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
We don't know whether "everyone" is including hypothetical. Even if it is not including hypothetical, the statement ­
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers

is still incorrect.

if an object is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people), it could mean two things


1. the object is not beautiful but is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people) . Meaning it has flaws. In this case hypothetical ones will find it ugly. (here statement is valid.)

2. the object is actually beautiful. In this case, hypothetical ones will also find it beautiful. (here statement is not valid.)

 ­
Show more
­Woah, that actually makes sense - thanks a ton!­
User avatar
Gemmie
User avatar
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
427
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 427
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 11 Aug 2024, 03:12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­The student is arguing that just because something is considered beautiful by everyone doesn't mean it truly is beautiful.
This is based on the idea that even the most sophisticated observers are limited, and there could be flaws invisible to them but apparent to a hypothetically, even more sophisticated observer.

=> If an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers,
then that object is not truly beautiful.

If an object would be judged as hideous by these hypothetical more sophisticated observers, then it is not genuinely beautiful. In other words, true beauty is independent of current opinions and depends on a higher, possibly unattainable standard.­
User avatar
haianh
User avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
25
Given Kudos: 76
Products:
GMAT Club Tests
Posts: 41
Kudos: 25
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever 29 Oct 2025, 00:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here’s a simpler version of the problem above:

Some objects that everyone finds beautiful might not actually be truly beautiful (1). Certain flaws can only be seen by the most perceptive observers. But even they, limited by their own understanding, might miss flaws that hypothetical observers with greater insight could notice (2).
  • Conclusion (1)
  • Premise (2)

Logic:
  • In general, (2) thus (1) = if more advanced observers would find flaws that current observers cannot, then the object is not truly beautiful.

Solution:
  • If an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers, then that object is not truly beautiful.
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105385 posts
kingbucky
496 posts