Last visit was: 17 May 2024, 13:04 It is currently 17 May 2024, 13:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11261
Own Kudos [?]: 32565 [12]
Given Kudos: 306
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 20 Apr 2022
Posts: 627
Own Kudos [?]: 255 [0]
Given Kudos: 319
Location: India
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14891
Own Kudos [?]: 65334 [2]
Given Kudos: 431
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
 
chetan2u wrote:
­
All Data Insight question: TPA [ Official Guide DI Review 2023-24] 
Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful. To see that this is so, consider this: No one doubts that some objects that are appreciated by many people have aesthetic flaws that are discernible only to sophisticated observers. But even these sophisticated observers are limited by their finite intellects and experiences. Thus, an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
In general, if an object ___1___, then that object ___2___.
Select for 1 and for 2 the two different options that complete the sentence in such a way that it expresses a principle on which the philosophy student's argument relies. Make only two selections, one in each column.

This is what he says: an object that appears beautiful to the most sophisticated actual observers may nonetheless have subtle but severe aesthetic shortcomings that would make it appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication. Such an object would be ugly, regardless of any actual person's opinion.
Some objects that are considered beautiful by everyone who has observed them may not be, in fact, truly beautiful.
This is the student's opinion. What is the principle he is using? 
That if an object would appear hideous to some hypothetical sophisticated observers, then the object is not beautiful. 
If X, then Y.
He says that if X happened, then Y will be true. He is concluding Y. He is concluding that then that object is not truly beautiful. 
Hence X - an object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers
Y - that object is not truly beautiful­
ANSWER - 3rd and 4th sentences
Quote:
Options B and E

If an object is thought by most observers to have some aesthetic flaws then that object is not widely appreciated by unsophisticated observers.
It seems to me that both B and E are saying similar things. Also, this may be true but is it the principle of the argument of the student? No. The student is not concerned with objects that are ugly to most people. He is concerned with objects that most people find beautiful. This is certainly not the principle he is using for his argument. ­
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
595 Q81 V82 DI75
Send PM
Re: Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
 
thenerdycat wrote:
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?

­Say for example, an object is truly beautiful. 

Now, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone,
then can we say "that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers " ? 

if its truly beautiful, then the object would appear beautiful to hypothetical observers as well. Right?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
595 Q81 V82 DI75
Send PM
Re: Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
manasp35 wrote:
thenerdycat wrote:
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?

­Say for example, an object is truly beautiful. 

Now, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone,
then can we say "that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers " ? 

if its truly beautiful, then the object would appear beautiful to hypothetical observers as well. Right?

­Okay, when you are referring to "everyone", we are also considering "hypothetical observers" as well. I was under the assumption that everyone refers to actual realistic people, and hypothetical observers as separate entity.

Anyway, now it makes sense - thank you! :)
Intern
Intern
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Re: Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
thenerdycat wrote:
manasp35 wrote:
thenerdycat wrote:
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers .

I chose this one, can someone highlight what's wrong with this approach?

­Say for example, an object is truly beautiful. 

Now, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone,
then can we say "that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers " ? 

if its truly beautiful, then the object would appear beautiful to hypothetical observers as well. Right?

­Okay, when you are referring to "everyone", we are also considering "hypothetical observers" as well. I was under the assumption that everyone refers to actual realistic people, and hypothetical observers as separate entity.

 

We don't know whether "everyone" is including hypothetical. Even if it is not including hypothetical, the statement ­

In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers

is still incorrect.

if an object is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people), it could mean two things


1. the object is not beautiful but is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people) . Meaning it has flaws. In this case hypothetical ones will find it ugly. (here statement is valid.)

2. the object is actually beautiful. In this case, hypothetical ones will also find it beautiful. (here statement is not valid.)

 ­
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1:
595 Q81 V82 DI75
Send PM
Re: Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
Quote:
We don't know whether "everyone" is including hypothetical. Even if it is not including hypothetical, the statement ­
In general, if an object is considered beautiful by everyone , then that object would appear hideous to hypothetical observers of even greater sophistication than the most sophisticated actual observers

is still incorrect.

if an object is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people), it could mean two things


1. the object is not beautiful but is considered beautiful by everyone (realistic people) . Meaning it has flaws. In this case hypothetical ones will find it ugly. (here statement is valid.)

2. the object is actually beautiful. In this case, hypothetical ones will also find it beautiful. (here statement is not valid.)

 ­

­Woah, that actually makes sense - thanks a ton!­
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Philosophy student: Some objects that are considered beautiful by ever [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
93332 posts
DI Forum Moderator
1029 posts
RC & DI Moderator
11261 posts