Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:53 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Evaluate Argument|                                    
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
prragya
Joined: 14 Dec 2024
Last visit: 24 Sep 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 9
Products:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GmatKnightTutor
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 31 Jan 2020
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,228
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5,228
Kudos: 1,568
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prragya
[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D, Hi

I do not quite understand why option E is not relevant.
If another insecticide can be used to control the Bollworms, then that proves that they have become resistant to the cotton's insecticide. And thus the 1st explanation of the problem, which is insecticide resistance holds true.

And hence, would help reject the other explanation, thus helps evaluate the argument.
Think of it this way: one of two things has to be happening here. Either (1) the bollworms have become resistant to the insecticide produced by the cotton or (2) the insecticide is no less effective, but there are way more bollworms to deal with because there's more corn.

Now imagine that we learn of the existence of some insecticide that could be used to control bollworms that have developed resistance to the natural insecticide produced by the cotton. Does that tell us anything about the existing bollworm damage?

Nope. This mythical insecticide would be a good solution if we establish that scenario #1 is the issue. But we haven't established that yet! If the cotton is just getting overrun by bollworms feasting on greater quantities of corn, then there'd be no insecticide-resistant bollworm we'd need a solution for.

Put another way, the question is about the cause of the bollworm problem. (E) presents a potential solution for one of those causes without helping us diagnose what that cause actually is.

I hope that clears things up!
User avatar
soniasw16
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 41
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 41
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why is D irrelevant? If we can show that the cotton was destroyed by pests other than ballworms, won't that be useful is stating that the cotton may not be overwhelemed by corn-bred ballworms, and instead by other pests?
GMATNinja
The passage says that this year's cotton plantings are being seriously damaged by bollworms. The conclusion of the passage is that "it is likely that the cotton is simply being overwhelmed by corn-bred bollworms." Let's review the author's argument:

  • Bollworms are a major cause of cotton crop failure.
  • To combat this problem, cotton bioengineered to produce its own insecticide against bollworms has been used. Until this year, plantings of the bioengineered cotton sustained little bollworm damage.
  • This year, all of the sudden, the bioengineered plantings are being seriously damaged by bollworms. Why is that? What has changed?
  • A possible explanation is that the bollworms have developed a resistance to the cotton's insecticide.

The author believes that there is another possible explanation:

  • Last year more corn than usual was planted throughout cotton-growing regions.
  • Bollworms breed on corn.
  • It is possible that the bollworms have NOT developed resistance to the cotton's insecticide. Rather, the bollworms may simply be breeding on the corn and then infesting the nearby cotton plants.

The author thus concludes that "it is likely that the cotton is simply being overwhelmed by corn-bred bollworms." We have two possible explanations... is the second one likely?

In evaluating the author's argument/conclusion, which of the following would be most useful to establish?

Quote:
A. Whether corn could be bioengineered to produce the insecticide
This offers a possible solution to the problem described in the second explanation, but we need something that helps us determine whether the second explanation is even accurate. In other words, choice (A) provides a possible treatment without helping us determine whether the diagnosis is accurate. Thus, choice (A) does not help us evaluate the author's argument and can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. Whether plantings of cotton that does not produce the insecticide are suffering unusually extensive damage from bollworms this year
The passage states that "last year more corn than usual was planted throughout cotton-growing regions." Notice that this does NOT specifically say that more corn was planted only among the bioengineered cotton. Thus, if the author's conclusion is accurate, we would expect an increase in bollworm damage throughout those cotton-growing regions, not just to the bioengineered plantings.

In other words, if the bollworms are coming from corn, and there is now more corn throughout cotton-growing regions, there should be increased damage to ALL cotton in those regions. If that were not the case, we would have reason to question the author's conclusion. Choice (B) would be useful in evaluating the argument, so hang on to this one.

Quote:
C. Whether other crops that have been bioengineered to produce their own insecticide successfully resist the pests against which the insecticide was to protect them
We don't care about other crops. We KNOW that the bioengineered cotton plants successfully resisted the bollworms for years, and we need to figure out why they are suddenly being damaged by the bollworms. Choice (C) does not help us evaluate the explanations described in the passage, so eliminate this one.

Quote:
D. Whether plantings of bioengineered cotton are frequently damaged by insect pests other than bollworms
We are specifically told that this year's plantings are being seriously damaged by bollworms, and we need to evaluate the explanations posed by the author. Information about other pests is irrelevant, so eliminate (D).

Quote:
E. Whether there are insecticides that can be used against bollworms that have developed resistance to the insecticide produced by the bioengineered cotton
We are not looking for ways to SOLVE the new problem. Rather, we need to evaluate WHY the problem has developed. Choice (E) does not help us evaluate the explanations described in the passage and can be eliminated.

Choice (B) is the best answer.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
soniasw16
Why is D irrelevant? If we can show that the cotton was destroyed by pests other than ballworms, won't that be useful is stating that the cotton may not be overwhelemed by corn-bred ballworms, and instead by other pests?
The passage specifically tells us that "the plantings are being seriously damaged by bollworms." So we know for sure that the damage is NOT caused by other pests, and we don't need to consider that possibility.

Here's a link to the full explanation for anyone who missed it: https://gmatclub.com/forum/plantings-of-cotton-bioengineered-to-produce-its-own-insecticide-again-40006.html#p2273651.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts