Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 30 Mar 2017, 07:39

Expecting:

R2 Admission Decisions from Wharton: Join Chat Room 3

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Please rate my essays. First attempt & my exam is in 1 week

Your input on my combined AWA score (Polled together as I can only do 1 poll)

You may select 1 option
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Please rate my essays. First attempt & my exam is in 1 week [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Feb 2012, 18:36
My exam is in one week and I would greatly appreciate any feedback I can receive on my essays. These were taken from a Manhattan GMAT CAT. ANY help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Analysis of an issue
Quote:
ESSAY QUESTION:
"Since key personal traits that make a good leader are formed during one’s childhood and youth, formal training can only refine rather than cultivate true leaders.”

Explain what you think this quotation means and discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with it. Develop your position with reasons and/or specific examples drawn from history, current events, or your own experience, observations, or reading.

The author states that true leaders are created by the traits that one learns during his childhood, and that formal training can only improve these traits rather than create true leaders. I disagree with this statement as I believe true leaders emerge everyday based on their experiences, not just the traits they learned during childhood.

As a child, ones maturity and mental capacity is not nearly as large as an adults. For this reason, adults are more inclined to pick up more advanced skills, such as leadership. Children who demonstrate leadership skills may be doing so without realizing it, while an adult who is actively aware of his actions might try his best to demonstrate his leadership skills. Formal training is rigorous and allows an adult to experience situations that he may not have experienced before. Children who formed good leadership skills during childhood may not have experienced these situations and as a result will be unprepared if the situation actually does arise later in life.

During my childhood I was often shy and never stood out as a real leader. Today, I am the exact opposite and volunteer to lead people. I've had many leadership experiences through my class projects and internships. In the latter, I was formally trained on exemplifying good leadership skills. This training was invaluable in my development as an aspiring leader.

For all of these reasons and more, I disagree with the author that good leaders are people who learned leadership traits only as a child. I am able to support my statement through the observations and experiences I previously mentioned.

Analysis of an argument
Quote:
ESSAY QUESTION:
The following appeared in a trade publication for the insurance industry:

“Each generation of Americans has lived longer that the ones preceding it, as the national life expectancy has approached 80 years old in recent years. The progress of medical technology shows no sign of abating. Therefore, we can confidently predict that most children born in America in the next decade will live past the age of ninety.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

The argument states that the current average life expectancy of Americans is eighty years old, and that within the next decade, average life expectancy will increase to over ninety years old. I believe that the author's logic is flawed for many reasons that I will explain below. His lack of evidence discredits his statements and does not allow one to draw a valid conclusion.

First, the author supports his conclusion by citing that the progress of medical technology shows no sign of slowing down. This statement makes the assumption that medical technology alone is responsible for the increase in average life expectancy. Without any further information this statement is insufficient, as it is not supported by any evidence. The current increase in average life expectancy could be due to any number of things such as a decrease in disease, a less polluted environment, or a better knowledge of nutrition.

Second, the author assumes that based on the current progress of medical technology, the average life expectancy will surpass ninety years old. Even if all advances in average life expectancy were due to progress in medical technology, the author assumes that within a decade, average life expectancy will increase by over ten years. This implies that the increase in average life expectancy is linear and that each year, average life expectancy will increase by one.

Third, the author assumes that all future progress in increasing average life expectancy will occur at the same rate that it does today. The author even goes on to say that we can confidently predict this increase in average life expectancy. The future is uncertain and nobody knows what it will bring. War, famine, and disease are just some of the things that could happen over the next decade. The author makes the assumption that even if these life changing events occurred, the average life expectancy will still increase over the next ten years.

Based on the above assumptions, I find that this argument is flawed. The author's lack of evidence makes me doubt the credibility of his statements. Having sufficient evidence is essential to supporting the author's claims.
 Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Magoosh Discount Codes
Please rate my essays. First attempt & my exam is in 1 week   [#permalink] 23 Feb 2012, 18:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Please rate my first attempt at my GMAT essay! 1 week to go! 0 30 Dec 2013, 12:06
Please rate my first essay - Urgent, my exam is in 3 days 0 25 Dec 2013, 00:20
Experts - Please Rate my Essay - Exam in 2 weeks - Thanks!! 0 17 Oct 2013, 09:54
Please rate my essay (exam in a week) 2 25 Jun 2013, 02:39
1 Please rate my first essay: Issue 1 2 10 Oct 2010, 22:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by