Let me be clear guys, I am not an expert. I'm just someone who scored a 5 in first GMAT I took (and a 5 in first GRE I took in 2015!)
Whatever I've mentioned is clearly my opinion, just read the comment positively, and take in what you need to improve!
Can someone review my AWA on same topic
AkshayKS21The argument claims that Federville Farms
can provide provides (Argument claims that camp does provide, and not that it "can" provide the best experience the best summer camp experience for children.The argument tries to
back its claim (I don't feel this is formal way to say "support"by providing supporting data such as a survey result, the fact that Federville Farms is family owned and hires more Red Cross certified Life guards then (do look out for spelling mistakes. This should be "Than") any other company. by providing survey result data, and by mentioning the fact that FF is family owned and that FF hires more Red cross .....Stated this way, the argument lacks several key factors on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion of
this the arugment relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence.
Hence, the argument is weak and has several flaws.
First, the argument uses data from a recent survey to highlight
its (Its refers to argument here) Camp's high ranking in overall camper satisfaction, food quality and variety of outdoor activities.
However, nowhere does it mention about the source of the survey and how authentic
it (it refers to source here) the survey is.
Its It is imperative to determine
how genuine the survey is survey's genuineness (or authenticity) before any parent decides to send his/her kid
to the camp. There have been several instances in the past where companies have selectively highlighted only those
survey's surveys where in which they
have a good ranking (I feel) "...in which they have higher rank" is crisp and clear. Besides, what is good ranking? Among 100, 10 is good or not? Good for who?.
Second, the argument stresses on the point that Federville Farms is family owned and is in business since last 40 years. While
its
it is comforting for a parent to know that camp has been
in business for last 4 decades,it is essential to evaluate
its performance the performance of camp over the years.
Data such as testimonials of parents who sent their kids to Federville Farms and overall
ranking of the farm by a renowned industry expert would certainly strengthen this point. (I think this point better go in the conclusion paragraph. This way your next point about life guards is in continuation with previous points without getting interrupted with non-relevant info)
The argument also highlights that it employs more Redcross certified life guards than any other camp in the state. While this is certainly a strong point, we also need to know the ratio of
lifeguard to student to make sure this will comfort the parents. There could possibly be a situation where Fedeville employs more life guards but is poor in overall lifeguard per student ratio.
Finally,
its it is important to define
specificparameters which are important to evaluate a good camping experience.
There could be several other factors besides food quality, outdoor activity and safety which constitute an experience. Once we narrow down on specific parameters,
its it is important to
have industry
data to experts (data can't review. Experts have to review) review how Federville Farms perform against competition.
To conclude, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing.
Insert the blue line here! Makes more sense here. Do change few words so that the sentence suits here.
It If we insert blue line, then this "it" should be replaced with "The argument" could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all relevant facts.
You have written a good AW. There are some minor flaws which can be corrected. Use your SC knowledge here to form the sentences. (Repeating pronouns should refer to single noun, avoid -ing if direct verbs can be used, being clear and avoiding passive voice if possible, etc ). Spell check your passage in the main exam. Double check everything before hitting that submit button!
I see you have used the chineseburned approach. I recommend reading the sample replies too.
I will rate this a 4.5 or a 5, I find some diction and syntactical errors.
P.S. : Didn't re-read this. Ignore the typos.