You covered three points.
In your first point - you were trying to convey that the demand has increased thereby 40 stores opened. Acc to you, any of these could have led to the increase in demand:
- McDowell's shutdown
(I don't think the author conveys that. In my opinion not a good reason)
- some other reasons
(what other reasons? I suggest you add some. Maybe improvement in its service? Perhaps change in policies? Mouth to mouth publicity?)
second point - good point!
Third point - you said that mcdowells business is probably outdated and therefore needs webadvertising to increase sales. However, in your first point you mentioned that the television quality may have become better (whereas here you said it became poor. I know these are used to substantiate different points. However, the whole passage together must also be logical. Don't you think?)
- the point here you are trying to convey is that if webadvertising has worked for mcdowell, this does not necessarily mean it will work for others. But the reason you took to came to this point isn't very strong I think.
The last point in third para is good (about only two types of advertising).
In your conclusion - you mentioned that you must analyze the business in order to find which marketing suits well/demand for marketing type. Well done here. Otherwise, analyzing the business is a wide scope (good that you mentioned why).
One grammatical error - in the conclusion para, 'mention' must be 'mentioned'.
If you disagree with any of the statements and have reasons, post it back here!
Sent from my Redmi Note 3 using
GMAT Club Forum mobile app