It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 00:06

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Policy analyst: CAFTA the Central American Free Trade

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 250

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys

Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 20:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:03) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 13 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Policy analyst: CAFTA—the Central American Free Trade Agreement—is a good thing. If we enact CAFTA, we essentially drop trade barriers between the US and a host of Central American companies; that means lower production costs for American companies, lower retail prices for American consumers, and more income from exports for the US. These are undeniably good things. But all good things in economic policy come at a price. The price of CAFTA’s benefits is the outsourcing of American jobs. For prices to drop and companies to make more money, overhead costs must be slashed. CAFTA lets companies send all their manufacturing jobs to Central America, where workers make a fraction of what American workers make and where factories are poorly regulated and thus cheap to operate. In the end, the savings of the average American at the store will not compensate for the loss of income from outsourcing.

The boldface portion of the analyst’s argument serve what function?

(A) The first offers the analyst’s conclusion; the second gives a consideration that counts against that conclusion.
(B) The first presents a reason in favor of the analyst’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first gives a reason that counts against the analyst’s conclusion; the second gives a reason that the analyst thinks supports the first reason.
(D) The first is a factor that weighs against the analyst’s conclusion; the second presents an explanation of why this consideration should be disregarded.
(E) The first is the analyst’s conclusion; the second presents a consequence of that conclusion.
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Intern
Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 21:07
IMO D.

The conclusion of the analyst is the statement "End the end.. ". So, A and E are gone. 1st bold statement is opposite to the conclusion. so B is also gone. Now 1st and 2ns statement state 2 opposite things , so C is also gone. that leaves D.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 801

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 21:21
clear D

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1534

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 22:33
Clear D.

Kudos [?]: 279 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

04 Feb 2009, 23:12
Clear D. 2:45 though...yikes...

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 02:32
D.
For the first time, I cld ans a bold face problem with confidence. These BF problems really terrorise me . Can sum1 help?

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 426

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Schools: Kellogg Class of 2012

Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 02:46
Agree with D

Cheers,
Unplugged

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 4

Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 960

Kudos [?]: 295 [0], given: 5

Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 12:00
Not sure if it's that clear to me.

Between A) and E), I went with A.

IF the first bold is NOT the conclusion, then what is?

In the end, the savings of the average American at the store will not compensate for the loss of income from outsourcing.

I believe this is a premise.

Kudos [?]: 295 [0], given: 5

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 2

Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 17:39
Not sure if it's that clear to me.

Between A) and E), I went with A.

IF the first bold is NOT the conclusion, then what is?

In the end, the savings of the average American at the store will not compensate for the loss of income from outsourcing.

I believe this is a premise.

I was also debating between A & E, and chose A simply because it fit a little better.

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 2

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 1

Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 17:58
1
KUDOS
I agree this Q was very confusing.The opening statement makes it appear as if it were the conclusion.

But D has a pretty strong case. If we arrange all the events in chronological/logical order, what is the last word on this whole thing?

Is CAFTA a good thing the last word (or) If we adopt CAFTA for its good reasons, there are dire consequences

Logically it seems to be the later. How can the Policy expert still conclude that CAFTA is a good thing despite the huge loss in income unless there is an evidence that favors less prices to lower incomes. There is not.

Hence I believe it is D.

A was the trap and I fell for it to start with.

Kudos [?]: 437 [1], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 460 [0], given: 14

Show Tags

05 Feb 2009, 22:38
I am still confused b/w A and E.......
Though D make sense but i doubt thats it's the OA.

Can someone throw some more light on it.....

Kudos [?]: 460 [0], given: 14

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 13

Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon

Show Tags

06 Feb 2009, 14:11
Hi mates,

IMO D

The conc. is that the savings of the average American at the store will not compensate for the loss of income from outsourcing. And Oursourcing comes from CAFTA. Therefore, saying that the CAFTA is good goes againts the conc. and the second part explains why outsourcing should be disregarded.

OA and Source?

Cheers

rampuria wrote:
Policy analyst: CAFTA—the Central American Free Trade Agreement—is a good thing. If we enact CAFTA, we essentially drop trade barriers between the US and a host of Central American companies; that means lower production costs for American companies, lower retail prices for American consumers, and more income from exports for the US. These are undeniably good things. But all good things in economic policy come at a price. The price of CAFTA’s benefits is the outsourcing of American jobs. For prices to drop and companies to make more money, overhead costs must be slashed. CAFTA lets companies send all their manufacturing jobs to Central America, where workers make a fraction of what American workers make and where factories are poorly regulated and thus cheap to operate. In the end, the savings of the average American at the store will not compensate for the loss of income from outsourcing.

The boldface portion of the analyst’s argument serve what function?

(A) The first offers the analyst’s conclusion; the second gives a consideration that counts against that conclusion.
(B) The first presents a reason in favor of the analyst’s conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first gives a reason that counts against the analyst’s conclusion; the second gives a reason that the analyst thinks supports the first reason.
(D) The first is a factor that weighs against the analyst’s conclusion; the second presents an explanation of why this consideration should be disregarded.
(E) The first is the analyst’s conclusion; the second presents a consequence of that conclusion.

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 13

Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 116

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

09 Feb 2009, 20:05
Where does this question come from? I can't find a correct answer.
_________________

Grumpy

Kaplan Canada LSAT/GMAT/GRE teacher and tutor

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 13

Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon

Show Tags

11 Feb 2009, 12:47
And I think it's time for OA...

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 13

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10120

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

07 Jan 2015, 10:47
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Policy analyst: CAFTA the Central American Free Trade   [#permalink] 07 Jan 2015, 10:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by