Mahmoudfawzy83
janeyeo
Hello, I'd like to know the difference between A&B. Because I thought its structure should be "whether S+V or S+V" so I chose A but the answer is B.[/spoiler]
Can someone reply to
janeyeo 's question?
hello
janeyeo,
Mahmoudfawzy83I'm not an expert, but try to help
Historians and economists have disagreed about whether the 1929 collapse of stock prices caused the international catastrophe known as the Great Depression or did it simply reflect the underlying weakness of the United States economy.Meaning:
1. Historians and economists have disagreed about something
2. this something whether the 1929 collapse of stock prices
3. caused the international catastrophe known as the Great Depression
4. or did it simply reflect the underlying weakness of the United States economy
Attachment:
A.JPG [ 52.99 KiB | Viewed 3014 times ]
janeyeo
Hello, I'd like to know the difference between A&B. Because I thought its structure should be
"whether S+V or S+V" so I chose A but the answer is B
I think you've confused with usage of
either ... or
neither ... norwhether is used when the intent is to depict a choice, an alternative or a possibility.
Two specific situations in which whether should be used:
1. After prepositions
2. After verbs
in the given sentence we have only one //ism marker
"or"we have
"caused" and
"did" // to each other - fine so far
this
"or" is NOT part of the
'weather or not''weather or not' -- 'or not' of the weather is usually ellipsed, but we have to keep in mind that the meaning demands so.
in our case:
weather the collaspe {caused or did}
or notBut to me the main problem with (B) is pronoun
"it"it - refers to what? --> collapse ?
collapse did
collapsee simply reflect the underlying weakness of the United States economy -- seems not so logical
We have more clear and concise (B)
Attachment:
B.JPG [ 46.39 KiB | Viewed 2973 times ]