divhin
ARGUMENT -
A kayak manufacturer has determined that none of its products is entirely watertight. Therefore, it warns customers
that using the kayaks without adding watertight wax sealant will always result in a capsize.
What are the possible assumptions in this argument?
Premise: Kayak manufacturer has determined that its products are not entirely watertight.
Conclusion: Kayaks without watertight wax sealant will always result in a capsize
Possible Assumptions: 1) If kayaks are not watertight, water enters kayaks and causes capsize. There is no other alternative mechanism that prevents the capsize of Kayaks.
2) Wax sealants can make the kayaks completely watertight.
A pre thought assumption helps us to enhance our understanding of the question and argument. It need not always be similar to the answer choice.
P.S: Can you please post the answer choices along with the OA.
Hi Vyshak! Thanks for the response. I came across this question while learning the concept of assumptions.It does not have options or a correct answer. The assumptions mentioned by the author are below:
Assumption 1: One of the company's kayaks could never stay above water unless it is sealed with watertight wax sealant. [I did not understand this assumption.Can anyone explain?]
Assumption 2: There is no way in which a kayak can resist capsizing if that kayak is not watertight.