Last visit was: 21 May 2025, 00:47 It is currently 21 May 2025, 00:47
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 4,581
Own Kudos:
32,194
 [75]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,581
Kudos: 32,194
 [75]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
63
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 4,581
Own Kudos:
32,194
 [33]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,581
Kudos: 32,194
 [33]
21
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fameatop
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Last visit: 09 Jun 2017
Posts: 385
Own Kudos:
2,422
 [19]
Given Kudos: 275
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Posts: 385
Kudos: 2,422
 [19]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
Dinesh2Apr
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 Feb 2016
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 38
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Meaning :- President Clinton spent significant money on a program. the program did 2 things
a. led to a boom in school contr. ind
b. added thousands of jobs

Error Analysis :- which correctly modifies the program, but the 'and also..' can mean that President Clinton spent and President Clinton Added. Need a second which to correctly modify the program - parallelism error.

Option A :- Explained
Option B :- Uses correct idiom, not only - but also to modify program - Correct Answer
Option C :- the verb-ing modifier leading and adding now describe the effects of the preceding clause and does not modify program
Option D :- The school construction industry did not add jobs for teachers, the program did. Also similar verb-ing modifier error and in C
Option E :- Similar verb-ing modifier error as in C and also 'the construction industry of school' is wordy than 'the school construction industry'.

IMO :- B
User avatar
anshunadir
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Last visit: 05 Apr 2013
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 62
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Posts: 67
Kudos: 386
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

Meaning: President's action resulted in a boom in school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs
This sentence represents a cause-effect relationship between the two clause. such a relation can be correctly represented by starting the second clause with -ing modifier (leading).

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added presidents action resulted in a boom in school construction industry , but here "which" refers to country
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added presidents action resulted in a boom in school construction industry , but here "which" refers to country
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding correct
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added meaning issue. the original sentence means that presidents action resulted in a boom in school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs. But here the sentence says that boom in the construction industry added new jobs
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added which incorrectly refers to construction industry,
avatar
sangamsrk
Joined: 19 May 2012
Last visit: 04 Nov 2013
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="egmat"]President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added - Which modifying country .
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added - Same as A
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding - Idiom ( Not only ... But also ) used correctly. Two participle phases are parallel.
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added - Changed the meaning
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added - Changed the meaning
avatar
Dinesh2Apr
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 Feb 2016
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 38
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
fameatop, anshunadir,

For verb-ing modifier to explain the results of the preceding clause, the ver-ing modifier should modify both the subject and the verb of the preceding clause also the subject should make sense with the verb-ing.

the subject verb pair of the preceding clause is President Clinton - Spent, so grammatically option C is saying is that president Clinton spent money and this act resulted in boom in construction industry and also in adding the jobs. grammatically option C also states that President Clinton did the action of leading a boom in the school construction industry and president Clinton did the action of adding thousands of jobs. which is not correct.
the institution of program led to those activities.

Also if a modifier between a modified entity and relative pronoun cannot be placed anywhere else in the sentence then the relative pronoun will modify the head of the noun phrase. In the above sentence the prep phrase 'in several districts throughout the country' modifies program cannot be placed anywhere else in the sentence. hence the relative pronoun will modify the entire noun phrase "the 'No.....country'" and correctly modifies the head of the noun phrase.

I might be moving in a tangential direction but just trying to get my concepts cleared in the process :)
User avatar
prasannajeet
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE:Engineering (Telecommunications)
Posts: 77
Kudos: 120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stuck up between C and E but finally chose "E" why????????

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added--wrong modifier
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added---wrong modifier
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding--correct idiom but tense unveil something else
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added--wrong modifier
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added....Money already been spent..so the result have to be simple past that's why "which added" is correct
User avatar
MOKSH
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Last visit: 21 Sep 2019
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.9
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO:E
President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which ( antecedent is not clear , it may country/program , however by meaning it seems that spending money on the "no child left behind" program ---> led to boom....so cause n effect relnship => leading in stead of using which would be btr construction) led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added ( not clear who added thds of jobs ) thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added :incorrect (explained in main clause)
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding (leading and adding should not talking abt the same theme and topic , so these two should nt b parallel) :incorrect
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added (school construction industry cant add teachers to them , rather school can thds of jobs ) :incorrect
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added :correct (correctly show the cause-effect relnship ...and added thds of jobs correctly modify the school)

OA and Official explanation will be posted later. Looking forward to your detailed explanations!

Regards,

Payal
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 4,581
Own Kudos:
32,194
 [1]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,581
Kudos: 32,194
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Some great explanations here. Lets get a few more folks to respond before we disclose the OA and the explanation. Don't forget to use the poll.
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,005
Own Kudos:
4,155
 [2]
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,005
Kudos: 4,155
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great question e-GMAT...Really a 700+ one.

And Kudos for your awesome explanations.

Unfortunately I got it wrong... :( Can you please come up with more of this type of questions after few days so that those who got it wrong like me, will get a chance to verify the lesson learnt here.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 4,581
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,581
Kudos: 32,194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bagdbmba
Great question e-GMAT...Really a 700+ one.

And Kudos for your awesome explanations.

Unfortunately I got it wrong... :( Can you please come up with more of this type of questions after few days so that those who got it wrong like me, will get a chance to verify the lesson learnt here.

Sure bagdbmba...But why did you go wrong here? And what is the lesson learned here?
And have I thanked you before for consolidating all e-GMAT posts in one place...If not, then here I am thanking you :)
avatar
Dinesh2Apr
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Last visit: 09 Feb 2016
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 38
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
All I can say is practice, practice and practice :(

Good question Payal.

I have 1 question in the above sentence, ignoring the other errors, what can the pronoun 'which' refer to, can it refer to the Country or the program ?
User avatar
carcass
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 4,647
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,761
Products:
Posts: 4,647
Kudos: 35,759
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I love this sentence for the reason that a lot of students do not think flexible. (sorry this is not a charge)

In this exam, in each question you MUST use all your tools in your arsenal (btw, love this word because reminds me of megadeth :) )

When meaning is not sufficient to takle a question spot what is the problem using grammar point of view, and viceversa. Both if necessary when you scan the question and try to anticipate always the answer. For instance: reading the question the key word is \(program\)

A) which after comma modifies country - out, immediately

B) the same - out

C) mmmmm leading and adding - seems fine. mmmmm not only...but also.....mmmmmmmmm seems fine. keep (15 seconds to think about)

D) leading......mmmmm seems good, keep going........which after comma modifies industry and this change all things........out - immediately

E) same process untill I encouter which......mmmmmmm now modifies school before industry, in concrete are you kidding me ?? - stay away

C and move one. no more of 50/60 seconds to do this mental process.

I admit that is not always simple (and of course me too picks a question wrong, even two :D or five) but use your logic :)

If you have time read this article from Brian Galvin

Fraud or Phenom In Sentence Correction

I love it

regards
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,005
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,005
Kudos: 4,155
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
bagdbmba
Great question e-GMAT...Really a 700+ one.

And Kudos for your awesome explanations.

Unfortunately I got it wrong... :( Can you please come up with more of this type of questions after few days so that those who got it wrong like me, will get a chance to verify the lesson learnt here.

Sure bagdbmba...But why did you go wrong here? And what is the lesson learned here?
And have I thanked you before for consolidating all e-GMAT posts in one place...If not, then here I am thanking you :)

Hey e-GMAT,
Actually I got the meaning wrong...so NO EXCUSE !
I thought it's the program that is responsible for two good things as mentioned...later realized that it's the fact that the President spent that much of money and this has basically caused the program to yield two good results.

Very important lesson learnt here-'which' can't be used to modify or identify clauses. It can do so only to Nouns...

However, had the sentence been some different and the yield is directly caused by the Program itself, then I think 'which' would have been fine in the following use: "...the Program in several schools in the country, which is responsible for bla bla..., is an innovative one.!" Please let me know if I'm right?

And BTW, thanks for the appreciation...I guess the 'Kudo' to my last post is due to the consolidated SC article...not for the wrong answer surely :shock:
User avatar
bagdbmba
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Last visit: 10 Dec 2021
Posts: 1,005
Own Kudos:
4,155
 [1]
Given Kudos: 156
Posts: 1,005
Kudos: 4,155
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Folks,
Added this to my post : e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated

Refer to my sig.

@ Payal/Shradhha/Rajat-guys, can you please have a look at the consolidated post in my sig. on ALL of your SC topics and questions.Has updated the same with your recent SC 700+ questions.

Please let me know whether I've missed any.
User avatar
282552
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 02 Nov 2018
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 368
Location: United States
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
Schools: IIMA PGPX"20
Posts: 80
Kudos: 291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just wanted to get my confusion cleared on this one :
Doing this question the second time and again got it wrong.But this time I used a different logic and wanted to clarify that to make sure I never get this wrong again.
I understand ing modifier here is describing the result of action of the previous clause.But how does this -ing modifier applies to the subject "The president" of the previous clause.
Any explanation would be much appreciated.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 21 May 2025
Posts: 4,581
Own Kudos:
32,194
 [3]
Given Kudos: 679
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,581
Kudos: 32,194
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
282552
Just wanted to get my confusion cleared on this one :
Doing this question the second time and again got it wrong.But this time I used a different logic and wanted to clarify that to make sure I never get this wrong again.
I understand ing modifier here is describing the result of action of the previous clause.But how does this -ing modifier applies to the subject "The president" of the previous clause.
Any explanation would be much appreciated.



Hi 282552,
Thank you for the post. :)


It's great that you have correctly identified that the verb-ing modifiers ‘leading’ and ‘adding’ modify the preceding clause. Also, as you pointed out, these modifiers are describing the results of the action of the preceding clause. The only thing in which you faced a problem was how to check whether the modifier makes sense with the subject or not. Let’s do the sentence structure for the given sentence:


OFFICIAL QUESTION

President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country,
o not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry
o but also adding thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.


EXPLANATION

As you correctly identified, the verb-ing modifiers in this sentence present the result of the action ‘spending the money’. Let’s try to associate them with the subject ‘President Clinton’.

Now let's think a bit: Can President Clinton be the doer of the two actions: leading and adding?

We can say that President Clinton led to a boom in the school construction industry and added thousands of jobs by spending significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program. So, the subject makes perfect sense with the modifiers.

Hope the above discussion helps! :)
Regards,

Deepak.
avatar
portiahd
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Last visit: 22 Apr 2018
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi! I have some doubts on the Comma + Verb-ing modifier. It modifies the preceding clause and presents the result in this example. Also comma+ verb-ing modifier should associate with the subject of the preceding clause. President Clinton is the subject and I don't think the modifier makes sense with the subject.
Look forward to any replies and explanations. Thanks!
avatar
nintso
Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Last visit: 30 Dec 2015
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
24
 [3]
Given Kudos: 174
WE:Other (Retail Banking)
Posts: 27
Kudos: 24
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

I still have doubts about choice C. I chose choice B, because I thought that "which" modifier correctly modifies "No Child Left Behind" program. We know that "which" modifiers are noun modifiers and they can modify nouns or noun phases even slightly far away. However, "which" modifiers can not jump over the entire clause, in other words "which" modifier can not refer to "noun 1" in a construction like "noun 1 + verb + noun 2, which". But in this sentence, we don't have such a construction, we have noun phase “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, and "which" modifier may correctly refer to this entity. As for the meaning, as far as I understand, the program itself was what led to a boom in school construction industry and added jobs. Thus, the meaning of Choice B seams correct as well.

As for choice C, "comma+verb-ing" modifier modifies preceding clause and attaches to the subject of the clause, the subject and the "verb-ing" modifier should make sense together. However, if we look at the entire sentence, we can derive meaning that President Clinton led to a boom in school construction industry. On the other hand, I think it was not the President who led to a boom, but the "No Child Left Behind" program (supported by the President) which led the boom in the industry.

Please correct me if my understanding of "which modifiers" and "verb-ing" modifiers is wrong. Also, if E-GMAT could elaborate on these subjects, it would be very helpful for me (and maybe for other students who have similar doubts).


Thanks
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7307 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts