My 2 best friends just graduated from Darden. 3 years ago one (my roommate and college mate) scored 780 in GMAT and the other (my college mate) scored 760 in GMAT. We 3 are quite alike in terms of our background, and perhaps also very close in terms of our strengths and weaknesses.
I was talking to my friend who scored 780 about the validity of the scores and level of questions in Princeton Review. To my surprise he said - Princeton Review quant questions are not very different from original GMAT. I have been scoring 100% correct (with **** load of time still left) in PR quant as opposed to ~95% in others, so I was like something doesn't look right with PR tests. PR quant seems relatively easy; verbal seems decent though.
Could one of the experts here please comment on the genuineness and the credibility of the level of questions in PR CAT tests? Secondly, since I am pretty much not getting anything wrong in quant sections of PR tests and getting few wrong in
MGMAT (still 51 in all), does that mean I should not spend any time trying to strengthen my quant any further - I mean I have like **** load of
GMAT Club tests, should I just skip all those?
Thanks.