Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 07:35 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 07:35 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
09 Nov 2019, 09:21
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
62% (02:22) correct
38%
(02:30)
wrong
based on 719
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Principle: If an insurance policy is written in such a way that a reasonable person seeking insurance would not read it thoroughly before signing it, then the reasonable expectations of the policyholder concerning the policy’s coverage should take legal precedence over specific language in the written policy itself.
Application: The insurance company should be required to cover the hail damage to Celia’s car, even though specific language in the written policy Celia signed excluded coverage for hail damage.
Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?
(A) Celia is a reasonable person, and she expected the insurance policy to cover hail damage to her car.
(B) Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia’s insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage.
(C) The insurance policy that Celia signed was written in such a way that a reasonable person would not read it thoroughly before signing it, but Celia did read the policy thoroughly before signing it.
(D) Celia did not read the insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would assume that the policy would cover hail damage.
(E) Celia did not read the written insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would not have done so either.
Application: The insurance company should be required to cover the hail damage to Celia’s car, even though specific language in the written policy Celia signed excluded coverage for hail damage.
Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?
(A) Celia is a reasonable person, and she expected the insurance policy to cover hail damage to her car.
(B) Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia’s insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage.
(C) The insurance policy that Celia signed was written in such a way that a reasonable person would not read it thoroughly before signing it, but Celia did read the policy thoroughly before signing it.
(D) Celia did not read the insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would assume that the policy would cover hail damage.
(E) Celia did not read the written insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would not have done so either.
09 Nov 2019, 09:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
Imo. D
(D) Celia did not read the insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would assume that the policy would cover hail damage. - Justifies the application of principle that though she did not read the policy terms before signing and any reasonable person would assume that signed policy might have cover all types of damage to the car.
(D) Celia did not read the insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and a reasonable person in her position would assume that the policy would cover hail damage. - Justifies the application of principle that though she did not read the policy terms before signing and any reasonable person would assume that signed policy might have cover all types of damage to the car.
panopticon
Joined: 01 Feb 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Location: Canada
Schools: Molson '20
GPA: 3.96
09 Nov 2019, 15:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
The answer should be B.
If you follow the reasoning of this question, it goes as such:
1) an insurance policy is written in such a way that a reasonable person would not read it thoroughly before signing it.
2) a policy holder's (customer) expectations take precedence over the specifics of the insurance policy, given that option 1 is also true.
Option B follows this logic
Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia’s insurance policy thoroughly before signing it (compare to option 1).
Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage (compare to option 2).
If you follow the reasoning of this question, it goes as such:
1) an insurance policy is written in such a way that a reasonable person would not read it thoroughly before signing it.
2) a policy holder's (customer) expectations take precedence over the specifics of the insurance policy, given that option 1 is also true.
Option B follows this logic
Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia’s insurance policy thoroughly before signing it (compare to option 1).
Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage (compare to option 2).
sssanskaar
Joined: 09 Aug 2020
Last visit: 04 Jul 2026
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 163
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX'23
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39 (Online)
21 Jul 2021, 21:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Principle: If an insurance policy is written in such a way that a reasonable person seeking insurance would not read it thoroughly before signing it, then the reasonable expectations of the policyholder concerning the policy’s coverage should take legal precedence over specific language in the written policy itself.
Application: The insurance company should be required to cover the hail damage to Celia’s car, even though specific language in the written policy Celia signed excluded coverage for hail damage.
Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?
(B) Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia’s insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage. - CORRECT
Application: The insurance company should be required to cover the hail damage to Celia’s car, even though specific language in the written policy Celia signed excluded coverage for hail damage.
Which one of the following, if true, most justifies the above application of the principle?
(B) Given the way it was written, a reasonable person would not have read Celia’s insurance policy thoroughly before signing it, and Celia reasonably expected the policy to cover hail damage. - CORRECT
Quote:
