sobby wrote:
hi
abhimahnaThanks , I understand that point ...but my doubt is how to know whether "commenced" is verb or participle ..i marked A just because i thought it as participle...
i thought ..Production of the Ford Model "was commenced "....as production can't commence by itself...
Thanks in advance
Hi
sobby ,
The double comma rule says when we remove the stuff between two commas, the sentence should make sense.
Look at the sentence below: Production of the Ford Model T commenced in 1908, during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, was not discontinued until nearly two decades later, during the presidency of Calvin Coolidge, who stimulated competition in the automobile industry by lowering corporate taxes and encouraging consumer spending.
Now, what do you think? Is commenced still a verb-ed modifier? No, right? This is the main problem with option A.
Key rule to remember is : Before coming to a conclusion whether the such words are verbs or modifiers, make sure you remove the unnecessary stuffs.
pulkitaggi wrote:
Hi
abhimahna,
Please let me know if I am wrong-
In my understanding-
Which can also modify Production, as " of the ford model" is a prepositional phrase ( and a vital modifier) separating "which..." from its actual noun. But what I learned was that in cases like these instead blindly following the rule, understand the meaning.
----
And for option B similar issue - Colloquially, can refer to
production or
Model T. But it does not make any sense to modify production. Hence It clearly modify Model T. I believe the Option B is wrong because of the use HAD only. the AND separates two clauses completely and hence I cannot consider the verb in first phrase as pre-requite Verb for using Past perfect.
Lets discuss over this topic more- It will really help me. My paper is already scheduled. And in case you liked this post please give KUDOS.
Hi
pulkitaggi ,
Whatever you said is 100% true. Since 'which' cannot refer to production here, it must refer to the noun of 'of phrase'. Same goes for coloquiclly. I have corrected my post above. It must refer to the ford model.
pulkitaggi wrote:
Hi
sevenplusplus,
That was right ON target answer. It really makes sense. Thank you.
Because I can write 2 sentences completely separately-
- Production of the Ford Model T commenced in 1908, during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt.
- Production of the Ford Model T was not discontinued until nearly two decades later, during the presidency of Calvin Coolidge.
The 2 verbs has no relation with each other.
mikemcgarry Sir, Can you confirm this? I hope you see this post before 11th july
( I dont want top make mistake in my actual paper)
There is an exception to the use of past perfect. Whenever the sequancing of two past events is clear, we should always avoid using past perfect form.
In this sentence, we are clear that Production of the Ford Model T commenced in 1908 and it was not discontinued
until nearly two decades later. Notice the underlined words. It is clear that discontinue is happening after the commencement. Hence, using past perfect in such cases is not preferable.
Does that make sense?
Feel free to ask 'n' number of questions.