abhay.tyagi
Hey everyone,
Would really appreciate some honest takes on my profile and what I should be doing next.
Quick background:- Indian male (ORM), 27 right now
- Lawyer from a Tier 1 law school in India, GPA 3.3
- Tried building a startup during uni but had to shut it down during COVID
- Been involved with a couple of non-profits for ~3–4 years
- 2.5 YOE right now (will be ~3.5 by the time I apply). Mainly in Founder's Office and now Chief of Staff roles at early-stage startups (pre-Series A). Been deeply involved in both companies’ growth stories, so have a lot of tangible stuff to show.
Scores:- GMAT Focus Edition: 635 (Q82, V86, DI76) > did worse on DI than in mocks, ran out of time and left the last question blank
- GRE: 321 (Q160, V161) from Sept 2023 > took a cold mock recently and got 319
Questions:- Should I retake the GMAT or GRE? Which one seems like a better bet given my situation?
- How does my profile look overall for top programs (US, Europe, or elsewhere)?
- Any advice on what I can work on before targeting 2026 intake?
Thanks in advance! Thanks for sharing your profile
abhay.tyagi ! Good founder + operator experience, but you should retake the GMAT (or GRE) and aim significantly higher. With a stronger test + 3.5 years’ story that proves leadership/impact + excellent recommenders, you’ll be competitive for a healthy list of top US and European programs for 2026.
Starting with your strengths: Founder + startup operator background, entrepreneurial risk, product/market thinking, resilience. Chief of Staff / Founder's Office roles indicate strategic exposure, cross-functional leadership, and the ability to influence at a company level (valuable). Nonprofit involvement, good for leadership, community impact, and differentiation. Age + trajectory, you’ll still be in the “early career” cohort that many schools like for leadership potential (3-5 years).
Try to use crisp metrics: for example, “led X growth initiative that increased MAU by Y% / reduced churn by Z% / saved $A / signed B strategic partnerships”, adcoms love measurable impact.
Weaknesses: The test score signal shall be fixed, 635 is below the median for most M7 / top European programs. It weakens scholarship and interview probability. Academic signal, GPA 3.3 isn’t fatal but weaker than many peers; compensate with test + strong recommendations + quant evidence. Limited full-time experience, at ~3.5 years, you’re on the lower end for some programs (Stanford/Harvard prefer slightly older), so your story must be unusually compelling. ORM demographic, Indian male applicants are statistically larger in the pool; differentiate via storytelling and uncommon impact.
INSEAD, LBS, IESE, HEC Paris, these European schools value international experience & entrepreneurship; with 3-5 years and strong test, you can be competitive.
Why MBA & why now: show what skills you need (strategy, finance, consulting case skills, network), why you need the full-time MBA at a given school, and your 3-5 year goal (example, product strategy at a Tier-1 consulting firm or PM/strategy role at high-growth company). Diversity & contribution, nonprofit work + founder story + cross-functional experience are things that you’ll bring to class.
We would love to learn more about your academic background, extracurricular activities, professional experiences, and personal journey so we can offer a more tailored assessment of your profile and evaluate your chances at your target schools more accurately. Feel free to
book a profile evaluation session.You can also register for our Upcoming ESSAY WORKSHOPS. Craft essays that shine: pick powerful stories, match your goals with each school, and showcase authentic leadership.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE DETAILS