Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 14:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 38 [4] , given: 13

Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 06:50
4
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (02:37) correct 29% (01:41) wrong based on 415 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow companies in the Republic of Osum to sell salmon without any foreign competition. Some economists believe that the tariffs partly explain why Osum salmon costs one dollar more than Winterland’s salmon. If the government removed the tariffs, consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon than they would Osum salmon or else Osum companies would have to reduce the price of their salmon.

The conclusion reached in the last sentence depends upon which of the following assumptions?

A. The legislature of Osum proposes tariffs and the Prime Minister ratifies them.
B. Winterland has passed a countervailing tariff against salmon from the Republic of Osum.
C. A constitutional amendment is not needed to remove the tariffs.
D. Although the Republic of Osum has lower tariffs on salmon from other countries besides Winterland, these tariffs are just as effective in eliminating all salmon imports.
E. Osum salmon is not over one dollar better in quality than is Winterland salmon.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Daeny on 17 Sep 2012, 22:14, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Veritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes Magoosh Discount Codes
Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2012
Posts: 9
Concentration: Finance, Healthcare
GMAT Date: 12-31-2012
GPA: 3.37
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [3] , given: 10

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 12:51
3
KUDOS
This argument depends on the assumption that if there are no tariffs and Osum salmon costs more than Winterland one, Winterland salmon would win favour of consumers. Although Osum salmon is more expensive, consumers may still buy it if it has better quality. Therefore we should expect that Osum salmon higher price cannot be explained by it better quality.
A. There's nothing to do with the proposal of tariffs. INCORRECT
B. Tariffs against Osum salmon only affect Winterland market. INCORRECT
C. The requirement to remove the tariffs is out of scope.
D. Not relevant.
E. CORRECT. As stated above, if Osum salmon is not over one dollar better in quality than is Winterland salmon, there's no reason for consumers to waste money.
_________________

Kaplan CAT 1 640 on 15/9/12

Last edited by doraemonbeo on 18 Sep 2012, 05:35, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Status: Working on GMAT
Affiliations: Purdue University - EE; RF Design - Telecommunication
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 3.16
WE: Design (Telecommunications)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2012, 20:46
@doraemonbeo : Doesn't the option E say that the Osum salmon is not better in quality than Winterland? Assuming the tariffs are removed people would get Winterland's salmon because it is $1 cheaper & same quality as Osum's salmon. IMO it is C. Intern Joined: 06 Mar 2012 Posts: 35 Location: India Concentration: Operations, International Business GPA: 3.4 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 12 Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink] ### Show Tags 17 Sep 2012, 21:58 +1 E , if the osum salmon is not a dollar better in quality than the winterland's , there is no reason for people to keep buying the Osum's low quality salmon unless the prices for Osum salmon is drastically reduced. Director Affiliations: SAE Joined: 11 Jul 2012 Posts: 508 Location: India Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 GPA: 3.5 WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities) Followers: 44 Kudos [?]: 288 [1] , given: 269 Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Sep 2012, 03:00 1 This post received KUDOS +1 E Premise - Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow companies in the Republic of Osum to sell salmon without any foreign competition. Some economists believe that the tariffs partly explain why Osum salmon costs one dollar more than Winterland’s salmon Conclusion - If the government removed the tariffs, consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon than they would Osum salmon or else Osum companies would have to reduce the price of their salmon. We need to find the assumption on which the conclusion is based. Osum salmon is costlier than Winterland's but still people can buy osum' salmon if it is better in quality than winterland's salmon, but here we are concluding that people won't buy osum's salmon suggesting that it is not as good as winterland's in quality Option E tis our answer _________________ First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html Intern Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 6 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 18 Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink] ### Show Tags 20 Sep 2012, 02:12 1 This post received KUDOS +1 E Let's say the price in Winterland is$4 and tariff is $1 --> the last price that consumers have to pay is$5 while the price in Osum is $5 with no tariff. => The price in Osum is actually$1 higher than in Winterland due to the tariff.

Now tariff gone, price in Winterland is $4 vs$5 in Osum

=> Conclusion: either consumers will buy more salmon in Winterland ( because it's $1 cheaper ) or companies in Osum have to reduce price (to compete with companies in Winterland) But what if comsumers still willing to pay higher price to buy salmon in Osum because of better quality? So choice E states that this difference in quality is not worth more than$1, which means consumers may afford only $0.5 for that better quality. So Either they buy$4-Winterland or $4.5-Osum, not$5.

=> This leads to the conclusion
_________________

I just need 25 Kudos to access the GMAT tests. Plz give me one if you found my post helpful

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10371
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2014, 02:12
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 2678
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 110

Kudos [?]: 859 [0], given: 324

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2014, 12:03
Daeny wrote:
Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow companies in the Republic of Osum to sell salmon without any foreign competition. Some economists believe that the tariffs partly explain why Osum salmon costs one dollar more than Winterland’s salmon. If the government removed the tariffs, consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon than they would Osum salmon or else Osum companies would have to reduce the price of their salmon.

Republic of Osum - Prohibitively High tariff on salmon from Winterland allows the country to seel without foreign competition.

Economist - Osum salmon > Winterland’s salmon. { Due to tariff }

If government removes tariff there will be 2 option available for Osum companies -

(1) Osum companies would have to reduce the price

(2) Consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon

The conclusion reached in the last sentence depends upon which of the following assumptions?

A. The legislature of Osum proposes tariffs and the Prime Minister ratifies them.

Out of scope...

B. Winterland has passed a countervailing tariff against salmon from the Republic of Osum.

Not relevant.

C. A constitutional amendment is not needed to remove the tariffs.

Out of scope.

D. Although the Republic of Osum has lower tariffs on salmon from other countries besides Winterland, these tariffs are just as effective in eliminating all salmon imports.

True , but we don't have sufficient data to claim " all salmon imports. "...

E. Osum salmon is not over one dollar better in quality than is Winterland salmon.

Possible...

The passage mentions2 option available for Osum companies to retain their sales / profit level...
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10371
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2016, 07:16
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 436
Location: India
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 15

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Mar 2017, 04:12
A. The legislature of Osum proposes tariffs and the Prime Minister ratifies them. ( Wrong answer : The concluding statement of the argument has been put forward as a conditional dependent clause of “If X then Y” type. Hence it is just a speculative scenario )
B. Winterland has passed a countervailing tariff against salmon from the Republic of Osum. ( Wrong Answer : This is irrelavent to the topic of discussion.)
C. A constitutional amendment is not needed to remove the tariffs. ( Wrong Answer : irrelevant to the argument at hand.)
D. Although the Republic of Osum has lower tariffs on salmon from other countries besides Winterland, these tariffs are just as effective in eliminating all salmon imports. ( Wrong Answer : The argument is only concerned with Winterland Salmon.)
E. Osum salmon is not over one dollar better in quality than is Winterland salmon.( Correct Answer : If it is not better then there is no reason why Osum salmon should cost dollar more than Winterland salmon)
_________________

Re: Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow   [#permalink] 22 Mar 2017, 04:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The Housing law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any 11 16 Mar 2013, 11:05
3 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed 3 26 May 2016, 19:20
2 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed 6 15 Oct 2016, 08:01
23 Federal law prohibits businesses from reimbursing any 21 27 Jan 2017, 23:23
84 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed 45 18 Oct 2016, 23:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by