Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 23:52 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 23:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Daeny
Joined: 31 Aug 2012
Last visit: 22 Jan 2013
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
185
 [22]
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 8
Kudos: 185
 [22]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
doraemonbeo
Joined: 01 Jul 2012
Last visit: 20 Sep 2012
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
6
 [4]
Given Kudos: 10
Concentration: Finance, Healthcare
GMAT Date: 12-31-2012
GPA: 3.37
Posts: 6
Kudos: 6
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Whatup780
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Last visit: 18 Feb 2015
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Status:Working on GMAT
Affiliations: Purdue University - EE; RF Design - Telecommunication
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GPA: 3.16
WE:Design (Telecommunications)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
vmdce129907
Joined: 06 Mar 2012
Last visit: 18 Mar 2014
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GPA: 3.4
Posts: 28
Kudos: 178
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 E , if the osum salmon is not a dollar better in quality than the winterland's , there is no reason for people to keep buying the Osum's low quality salmon unless the prices for Osum salmon is drastically reduced.
User avatar
getgyan
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Last visit: 27 Nov 2017
Posts: 378
Own Kudos:
1,002
 [1]
Given Kudos: 269
Affiliations: SAE
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE:Project Management (Energy)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 378
Kudos: 1,002
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 E

Premise - Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow companies in the Republic of Osum to sell salmon without any foreign competition. Some economists believe that the tariffs partly explain why Osum salmon costs one dollar more than Winterland’s salmon

Conclusion - If the government removed the tariffs, consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon than they would Osum salmon or else Osum companies would have to reduce the price of their salmon.

We need to find the assumption on which the conclusion is based. Osum salmon is costlier than Winterland's but still people can buy osum' salmon if it is better in quality than winterland's salmon, but here we are concluding that people won't buy osum's salmon suggesting that it is not as good as winterland's in quality

Option E tis our answer
:-D
User avatar
thienbinh
Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
91
 [1]
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 5
Kudos: 91
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 E

Let's say the price in Winterland is $4 and tariff is $1 --> the last price that consumers have to pay is $5 while the price in Osum is $5 with no tariff.

=> The price in Osum is actually $1 higher than in Winterland due to the tariff.

Now tariff gone, price in Winterland is $4 vs $5 in Osum

=> Conclusion: either consumers will buy more salmon in Winterland ( because it's $1 cheaper ) or companies in Osum have to reduce price (to compete with companies in Winterland)

But what if comsumers still willing to pay higher price to buy salmon in Osum because of better quality? So choice E states that this difference in quality is not worth more than $1, which means consumers may afford only $0.5 for that better quality. So Either they buy $4-Winterland or $4.5-Osum, not $5.

=> This leads to the conclusion
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,902
Own Kudos:
5,456
 [1]
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,902
Kudos: 5,456
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Daeny
Prohibitively high tariffs on salmon from Winterland allow companies in the Republic of Osum to sell salmon without any foreign competition. Some economists believe that the tariffs partly explain why Osum salmon costs one dollar more than Winterland’s salmon. If the government removed the tariffs, consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon than they would Osum salmon or else Osum companies would have to reduce the price of their salmon.

Republic of Osum - Prohibitively High tariff on salmon from Winterland allows the country to seel without foreign competition.

Economist - Osum salmon > Winterland’s salmon. { Due to tariff }

If government removes tariff there will be 2 option available for Osum companies -

(1) Osum companies would have to reduce the price

(2) Consumers would either purchase more Winterland salmon

The conclusion reached in the last sentence depends upon which of the following assumptions?

A. The legislature of Osum proposes tariffs and the Prime Minister ratifies them.

Out of scope...

B. Winterland has passed a countervailing tariff against salmon from the Republic of Osum.

Not relevant.

C. A constitutional amendment is not needed to remove the tariffs.

Out of scope.

D. Although the Republic of Osum has lower tariffs on salmon from other countries besides Winterland, these tariffs are just as effective in eliminating all salmon imports.

True , but we don't have sufficient data to claim " all salmon imports. "...

E. Osum salmon is not over one dollar better in quality than is Winterland salmon.

Possible...

The passage mentions2 option available for Osum companies to retain their sales / profit level...
User avatar
KrishnakumarKA1
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 398
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Location: India
Posts: 398
Kudos: 314
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The legislature of Osum proposes tariffs and the Prime Minister ratifies them. ( Wrong answer : The concluding statement of the argument has been put forward as a conditional dependent clause of “If X then Y” type. Hence it is just a speculative scenario )
B. Winterland has passed a countervailing tariff against salmon from the Republic of Osum. ( Wrong Answer : This is irrelavent to the topic of discussion.)
C. A constitutional amendment is not needed to remove the tariffs. ( Wrong Answer : irrelevant to the argument at hand.)
D. Although the Republic of Osum has lower tariffs on salmon from other countries besides Winterland, these tariffs are just as effective in eliminating all salmon imports. ( Wrong Answer : The argument is only concerned with Winterland Salmon.)
E. Osum salmon is not over one dollar better in quality than is Winterland salmon.( Correct Answer : If it is not better then there is no reason why Osum salmon should cost dollar more than Winterland salmon)
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,427
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,427
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts