Mahmud6
(D)
Whenever a society’s economic life is so organized that two distinct times of life are treated as being fundamentally different from one another, each time of life can be understood only in terms of its own distinct psychology.
What if the society’s economic life is NOT so organized? Is the argument concerned with the society’s economic life?
Hi
1. The question stem “
Which one of the following principles, if established, would provide the strongest backing for the argument?” clearly asks us to imagine
“if” something was true.
“
Whenever” and
“if” are equated as same. For example:
If it rains, Mr X carries an umbrella = Whenever it rains, Mr X carries an umbrella.
2. “
But old age is as fundamentally different from young adulthood and middle age as childhood is—a fact attested to by the organization of modern social and economic life.”
The above excerpt clearly implies that one’s psychology when one is young and one’s psychology when one is old is different. This fact is supported by “organization of modern social and economic life”.
Now the Conclusion is:
Surely it is time, therefore, to acknowledge that serious research into the unique psychology of advanced age has become indispensable. We have to support that “serious research into the unique psychology of advanced age” is required.
Why? Because the psychology of each age has to be studied in its own setting.
Thus,
if the setting is =
Whenever a society’s economic life is so organized that two distinct times of life are treated as being fundamentally different from one another,
Then =
each time of life can be understood only in terms of its own distinct psychology.
Hope this helps