Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
etta
Joined: 18 Jul 2013
Last visit: 21 Jan 2014
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 38
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
brianlange77
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Last visit: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 187
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
missxmelon
User avatar
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
Last visit: 17 Oct 2022
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Affiliations: SPG Platinum, Southwest A-List
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.56
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 215
Kudos: 94
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
hamm0
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Last visit: 31 Mar 2015
Posts: 474
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V40
WE:Asset Management (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V40
Posts: 474
Kudos: 291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
brianlange77
Two thoughts:

1. The Booz name has taken a hit b/c of the Snowden stuff.
2. As with many mergers post 2007-, this probably presents more cost-reduction upside than it does revenue-generation upside.

Just my $0.02.

-Brian

Just want to point out that Snowden worked for Booz Allen Hamilton, which is not the same firm as Booz & Co. BAH and Booz split several years ago, and had/have separate owners. BAH focuses mainly on government contract work, while Booz tends to compete more in the strategy space.
User avatar
brianlange77
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Last visit: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 187
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Either way -- it's symbolic of an economic period in which mergers happen for below the top-line efficiencies.... it's rarely about top-line growth.
User avatar
method
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 27 Feb 2021
Posts: 684
Own Kudos:
157
 [1]
Given Kudos: 249
Status:Go Blue!
Location: United States (MO)
Concentration: Nonprofit, General Management
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
GPA: 3.22
WE:Management Consulting (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Michigan (Ross) - Class of 2015
GRE 1: Q170 V166
Posts: 684
Kudos: 157
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I disagree with the cost-reduction point. This is a services industry in which the product is the people. This is not like merging two manufacturing companies and taking advantage of excess capacity or creating increased purchasing power via volume leverage. Furthermore, a lot of these firms appear to be fairly lean. Projects often have 1 or 2 analysts, consultants, and an EM. I'm not sure where you start to cut people without sacrificing serious quality or speed.

Consulting industry consolidation is much more about strategic positioning and synergies than it is operational efficiency. Strategy firms are reaching down into implementation, and implementation firms are reaching up into strategy. They still differentiate on a number of factors, but I think it's going to get harder and harder for most of the firms to compete without having some of both. Granted there are exceptions, but how long will they last? Even McKinsey is building technology platforms to sell to clients.
User avatar
brianlange77
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2013
Last visit: 09 Feb 2015
Posts: 187
Own Kudos:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 187
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
method
I disagree with the cost-reduction point. This is a services industry in which the product is the people. This is not like merging two manufacturing companies and taking advantage of excess capacity or creating increased purchasing power via volume leverage. Furthermore, a lot of these firms appear to be fairly lean. Projects often have 1 or 2 analysts, consultants, and an EM. I'm not sure where you start to cut people without sacrificing serious quality or speed.

Consulting industry consolidation is much more about strategic positioning and synergies than it is operational efficiency. Strategy firms are reaching down into implementation, and implementation firms are reaching up into strategy. They still differentiate on a number of factors, but I think it's going to get harder and harder for most of the firms to compete without having some of both. Granted there are exceptions, but how long will they last? Even McKinsey is building technology platforms to sell to clients.

Fair -- it's probably a bit of both. As lean as these companies are -- there are still two sets of 'inside function groups' here, right? HR, Finance, Ops, IT, etc. But also about being able to 'extend the sell.'

-Brian
Moderators:
Math Expert
105388 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts