It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 16:46

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3422

Kudos [?]: 9494 [1], given: 1203

QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2016, 02:07
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:29) correct 43% (01:38) wrong based on 290 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics



Sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.

Felipe: Why would you think that air pollution would decrease? During a recession, fewer people can afford to buy new cars, and cars tend to emit more
pollutants as they get older.

Which of the following most accurately describes how Felipe’s response is related to Sam’s argument?

(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion.
(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false.
(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence.
(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion.
(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked. 
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 9494 [1], given: 1203

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1799

Kudos [?]: 1065 [0], given: 90

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2016, 02:55
Sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.

Felipe: Why would you think that air pollution would decrease? During a recession, fewer people can afford to buy new cars, and cars tend to emit more
pollutants as they get older.

Sam's argument - Lesser cars during recession will lead to lesser pollution due to automobile exhaust .
Felipe's argument - During recession ,fewer new cars and older cars emit more pollutants .

(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion. Incorrect - It does not question the truth of premises
(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false.Incorrect -
(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence.
Correct - It present a new consideration and weakens Sam's conclusion
(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion.Incorrect
(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked. Incorrect
Answer C
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 1065 [0], given: 90

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 34

WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2016, 06:04
Answer C - Felipe presents an additional consideration that weakens Sam's conclusion

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 34

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3111

Kudos [?]: 1145 [0], given: 327

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2016, 09:43
carcass wrote:
Sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.

Felipe: Why would you think that air pollution would decrease? During a recession, fewer people can afford to buy new cars, and cars tend to emit more
pollutants as they get older.

Which of the following most accurately describes how Felipe’s response is related to Sam’s argument?

(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion.
(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false.
(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence.
(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion.
(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked. 


Sam : Recessions = Unemployment---->Fewer cars for commuting to office.----> Less Pollution
Felipe : Recessions = Unemployment----> Fewer people can afford new cars = Old cars => More pollution


(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion.

The premise is -fewer people commute in cars to jobs

Felipe's statement doesn't call into question into the Premise used by Sam

(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false.

Felipe's statement brings into consideration alternate reasoning , and is independent of Sam’s conclusion

(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence.

Filip's statement brings into question an additional consideration : Fewer people can afford new cars = Old cars ===> More Pollution

This is true...

(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion.

Not at all true , Filip clearly refutes Sam's conclusion...


(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked. [/quote]

Not at all true , Filip presents an alternate reasoning and doesn't attempt to challenge Sam's conclusion


Hence (C) is correct...

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1145 [0], given: 327

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2016
Posts: 406

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 197

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.8
WE: Operations (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2016, 09:44
Sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.

Felipe: Why would you think that air pollution would decrease? During a recession, fewer people can afford to buy new cars, and cars tend to emit more
pollutants as they get older.

Which of the following most accurately describes how Felipe’s response is related to Sam’s argument?

(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion - No it actually challenges the way in which the conclusion is arrived at hence eliminate this answer.
(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false. - Opposite answer and incorrect.
(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence - Correct! It uses the same premise as that of Sam's and provides an additional consideration thereby altering the or requiring Sam to re-think the conclusion.
(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion. - Incorrect. It argues sam's conclusion may not necessarily be true.
(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked - Trap Answer. but if closely looked at the argument does not declare the conclusion to be absurd neither does it challenge the premise rather it uses the same premise to add on another viewpoint.
.
C is the right answer.

Kudos [?]: 85 [0], given: 197

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 May 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 68

Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
GRE 1: 323 Q168 V155
GPA: 3.58
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2016, 05:17
Is sam's sentences even an argument?
It dosnt have a conclusion!!!

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 68

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 09 May 2015
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 68

Concentration: Marketing, Statistics
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
GRE 1: 323 Q168 V155
GPA: 3.58
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2016, 05:18
Is sam's sentences even an argument?
It dosnt have a conclusion!!!
:shock: :shock:

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 68

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 181

Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V26
GPA: 3.68
Re: QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2017, 19:19
carcass wrote:


Sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.

Felipe: Why would you think that air pollution would decrease? During a recession, fewer people can afford to buy new cars, and cars tend to emit more
pollutants as they get older.

Which of the following most accurately describes how Felipe’s response is related to Sam’s argument?

(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion.
(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false.
(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence.
(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion.
(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked. 



C - weakens the support

Where can we find a consideration that weakens the support?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 181

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 169

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 74

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.32
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2017, 05:25
bluetrain wrote:
carcass wrote:


Sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.

Felipe: Why would you think that air pollution would decrease? During a recession, fewer people can afford to buy new cars, and cars tend to emit more
pollutants as they get older.

Which of the following most accurately describes how Felipe’s response is related to Sam’s argument?

(A) It calls into question the truth of the premises that Sam uses to support his conclusion.
(B) It makes an additional claim that can only be true if Sam’s conclusion is false.
(C) It presents an additional consideration that weakens the support given to Sam’s conclusion by his evidence.
(D) It argues that Sam’s conclusion is true, although not for the reasons Sam gives to support that conclusion.
(E) It presents an argument showing that the premises in Sam’s argument support an absurd conclusion that Sam has overlooked. 



C - weakens the support

Where can we find a consideration that weakens the support?


Hi bluetrain,

Here is Sam's reasoning: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, air pollution due to automobile exhaust decreases during a recession, since fewer people com-mute in cars to jobs and so cars emitting pollutants into the air are used less.
-- light blue = premise/support
-- dark blue = conclusion

Now that I have highlighted these areas, is it more clear? Felipe says older cars emit more pollution, and a recession makes people drive older cars. Thus, this weakens Sam's argument by providing another detail that has not been considered in his argument.

Does this help?
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 74

QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai   [#permalink] 16 Nov 2017, 05:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD #6 sam: During recessions, unemployment typically rises. Thus, ai

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.