Explanations:
1. What is the primary purpose of this passage?
(A) To describe why the HCLA was passed, and why it proved ineffective -
The first para talks about why HCLA was passed. The second one talks about its cons. And the third one talks about another law which made ppl to migrate to city.(B) To provide an overview of the home building situation in the early 20th-century America -
The passage provides a detailed view. In particular about HCLA. So, not in general about the home building situation(C) To give an example of a misguided attempt to regulate the urban housing industry -
The passage was about rural housing(D) To contrast the HCLA with current housing and home construction laws -
No current laws were talked about in the passage(E) To elaborate on the reasons that Americans and foreigners
flocked to the big cities in the United States during the early 1900s -
Flocked is an extreme word. And this passage was more concerned about HCLA.(A) is the answer.
2. Which of the following would most appropriately conclude this passage?
The conclusion should say that HCLA failed or something along that lines.
(A) The HCLA could not withstand this migratory push from rural life to city life, and was repealed less than six years after becoming law. -
This falls in line(B) At the same time, the farming industry was increasingly in the hands of large corporations. -
Inserts new idea about farming(C) Even those elected officials who voted against the HCLA were surprised by its unpopularity. -
Inserts a new idea regd elected officials. And those who voted against generally shouldn't be surprised by its unpopularity. Self-contradicting (D) Though jobs were to be found in the large American cities, adjusting to urban life was still a shock for many young people who arrived at this time. -
Whether it was a shock to young ppl is not the point of the passage(E) The societal effect of the Tenement Housing Act continues to this day. -
This seems relevant. But most passage talked about HCLA and if this option said that THA continues to this day and HCLA was repealed then it can be considered.(A) is the answer.
3. According to the passage, one reason that the HCLA was expected to increase home construction in rural areas was that, under the HCLA, _______.
1st Para:
A family could move in and make payments to the government over a much longer period than they could if they were repaying a commercial lender.(A) interest rates were lower -
intereset was never talked about in the passage(B) the borrower could make smaller payments -
HCLA increased the loan tenure and decreased the amount paid. And hence, this was expected to increase home construction(C) insurance companies, not banks, loaned the money -
True but The source was not the problem(D) the borrower would not be able to default -
Out of scope(E) the net cost to the borrower was reduced -
We never know whether net cost increased or decreased from the passage.(B) is the answer.
4. According to the passage, the repercussions of the Tenement Housing Act _______.
Urban life was now more attractive to men and women who would have otherwise preferred to live in a rural area, but who needed the employment opportunities that the cities could provide.(A) provided more employment for people moving to cities from rural areas -
Opposite of the repercussion of the act. The act made moving from rural to cities more attractive.(B) had little effect on builders outside of New York City -
We dont know about this(C) was abandoned because of its cost to the federal government -
Out of scope(D) convinced some people to try to find work in the big cities of the United States -
According to the passage quoted above, this is sensible. Since moving to the city was more attractive, it could have convinced people to move to the city to find work.(E) led to the passage of the HCLA -
HCLA was passed before that(D) is the answer.