GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 25 Sep 2018, 18:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4999
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 12:26
2
21
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

67% (02:14) correct 33% (02:28) wrong based on 1040 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 65: Critical Reasoning

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

(B) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

(C) The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

(D) The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

(E) The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

_________________
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2033
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 12:35
14
2
When dealing with boldfaced questions, start by COMPLETELY IGNORING the boldface and finding the conclusion: "Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program." Now, let's make sure we understand the author's logic, and THEN we can see how the boldfaced portions fit in with that logic:

• Hatchnut is a large corporation in a small country and wants its managers to have international experience.
• In order to give its managers international experience, Hatchnut sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees each year.
• In addition to giving its managers international experience, Hatchnut also uses trainee performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions. So the program has two purposes: to provide international experience and to differentiate candidates for management positions.
• The author explains a problem with the current program: many of the management trainees who graduate from the program leave Hatchnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program.
• According to the author, both of the desired purposes could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the current attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hatchnut should discontinue the sponsorship program. In other words, if there are other ways to accomplish the goals of the program and the current program has a problem that cannot be addressed, Hatchnut should discontinue the current program.

Now let's see which option best describes the roles of the boldfaced portions:

Quote:
A. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

The first BF portion does describe a company practice, but the argument seeks to EVALUATE this practice, not to JUSTIFY it. Furthermore, rather than justifying the practice, the second BF portion suggests that the practice is not needed. (A) can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

The argument seeks to EVALUATE the practice rather than EXPLAIN it. Furthermore, the second BF portion does not serve to explain the practice, so (B) can be eliminated.

Quote:
C. The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

The first BF portion does introduce a company practice that the argument seeks to evaluate, but the second simply states that there are other ways to achieve the goals of that practice. The second does not necessarily imply that the current practice cannot achieve its objective, so (C) is off the mark.

Quote:
D. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

The first BF portion does introduce a company policy that the argument seeks to evaluate, and the second states that there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy. If there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy, then one could argue that the policy is not needed. Choice (D) looks good.

Quote:
E. The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

The first BF portion is the policy itself, not a consideration supporting the policy. The second is evidence for concluding that the policy COULD be abandoned (because there are other ways to achieve the policy's goals), but it is not necessarily evidence for concluding that the policy SHOULD be abandoned. Eliminate (E).

Choice (D) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

##### General Discussion
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 398
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 13:56
souvik101990 wrote:

As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions,but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

BF1 - Practice/Policy of a large corporation in a small country.

Change in Direction coming after the first BF
Company has found that many of their emps. leave post completion of the program
Company uses performance during the program - described in BF1 - to determine who can join the management positions BUT
BF2 - these can be achieve in other ways.

Conclusion - If the attrition problem cannot be address, the program should be discarded.

Quote:
A. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

The author isn't justifying the practice. He actually wants to discard it if the the problem persists. OUT!

Quote:
B. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

The author isn't explaining the practice, and BF2 isn't an explanation of the practice. OUT!

Quote:
C. The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

BF1 sounds fine, but BF2 isn't providing grounds. It's actually stating that the practice might not be required at all.

Quote:
D. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

Both are aptly describing the functions of the respective BFs. Keep!

Quote:
E. The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

BF1 isn't a consideration and rather the policy itself. OUT!

_________________

Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 414
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 19:50
souvik101990 wrote:

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 43: Sentence Correction

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions,but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

B. The first describes a practice that the argume nt seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

C. The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

D. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

E. The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

hard one
argumen is long so we need good reading skill.
for BF questions, I think , gmat test our ability to read. first we have to realize the main conclusion of the argument. normally, there is a counter conclusion which is not main conclusion.
second, we find out the relation between BF and the main conclusion.
armed with the relation and the main conclusion, we go to answer choice. eliminate without finishing reading the total answer choices which contain a wrong words at the beginning of the sentence.

if you read well, you can see the main conclusion quickly. I wish I have a ton of this questions to practice reading because reading to find the main conclusion/big idea of the passage is very good for RC section. I think it is good that gmac test this question type because this test help us a lot in studying MBA.

it takes me a long time to consider D and C. I choose D. i think "can not achieve purpose" is incorrect in C.
Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 46
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2017, 00:57
IMO option D

A - first part of option is wrong

B- second part is wrong

C- second part is wrong

D- ok

E- first part is slightly an issue

Posted from my mobile device
Retired Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 524
QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Nov 2017, 23:14
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
D. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

The first BF portion does introduce a company policy that the argument seeks to evaluate, and the second states that there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy. If there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy, then one could argue that the policy is not needed. Choice (D) looks good.

If there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy, then one could argue that the policy MAY not be needed. Can we say that the policy IS not needed?

One more thing, would you please share what is the fundamental difference between evaluate, justify and explain?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2033
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2017, 21:47
2
Mahmud6 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
D. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

The first BF portion does introduce a company policy that the argument seeks to evaluate, and the second states that there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy. If there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy, then one could argue that the policy is not needed. Choice (D) looks good.

If there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy, then one could argue that the policy MAY not be needed. Can we say that the policy IS not needed?

One more thing, would you please share what is the fundamental difference between evaluate, justify and explain?

Saying that a policy is not needed is different than providing grounds for holding that the policy is not needed. Saying that there are other ways to achieve the goals of that policy strongly supports the argument that the policy is not needed. The second boldfaced portion provides grounds for (i.e. supports) holding that the policy is not needed, even though it does not PROVE that the policy is not needed.

To evaluate an argument/plan is to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the argument/plan.

If you are explaining a practice, you are trying to describe that practice (i.e. make it plain and understandable). If you are justifying a practice, you are trying to show that it is defensible (i.e. just, right, or reasonable).

I hope that helps!
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 414
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2018, 04:15
souvik101990 wrote:
Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 65: Critical Reasoning

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

(B) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

(C) The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

(D) The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

(E) The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

after realizing the main conclusion and role of each BF we go to answer choices.
if the first part of answer choices is wrong, dont continue to read.
choice A
the first part contain "justify", which is wrong
choice B
the first part contains "explain" which is wrong
choice E
the first part contain "consideration" which is wrong
now read carefully choice C and D. both have correct first part. for the second part, choice D is better . Needed is more correct than "achivies it objective"

D.
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2018
Posts: 30
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2018, 06:32
As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

(B) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

(C) The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

(D) The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

(E) The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

A - The argument seeks to evaluate the policy and not justify. The second BF does not justify or support the practice. Incorrect

B - Again, the argument does not explain the policy. The second BF provides reasons for not holding the policy. Incorrect

C - The first BF seeks to evaluate the policy which is correct. However, the second BF does not provide grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective. It rather provides reasons for abandoning or not holding the policy. Incorrect

D - Correct

E - The first is not a consideration but a policy which the argument evaluates.

Hence, D is the best option.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2016
Posts: 72
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2018, 07:56
souvik101990 wrote:
Source : GMATPrep Default Exam Pack
As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees. Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program. Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways. Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

(B) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

(C) The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

(D) The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

(E) The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

Just got the question from Question of the Day

(A) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.BF1 and BF2 are wrong because the author does not want to justify the practice.

(B) The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.BF1 interests me, but the the author does not want to explain, he tries to evaluate it. Moreover, BF2 does not explain the practice. It presents that the plan is not needed.

(C) The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.
BF1 is fine. In BF2, it offers other causes.

(D) The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed. This one is perfect.

(E) The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned. The first part is alright, but the BF2 is not cited in order to claim that the practice should be abandoned. BF2 tries to tell us that the practice is not the only way to achieve.
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2018
Posts: 12
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2018, 07:29
Can someone explain what's the difference between the meaning of these two part of option D and E:

(D)The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate

(E) The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy
Re: QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country &nbs [#permalink] 19 Sep 2018, 07:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# QOTD: As a large corporation in a small country

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.