Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:08 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:08
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
555-605 Level|   Science|   Short Passage|      
User avatar
KittyDoodles
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2020
Last visit: 26 Mar 2025
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 346
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
Posts: 102
Kudos: 6
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 10 Apr 2023, 22:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,

Please can you explain QS 2. I was stuck between A and B.

Thanks
Kitty
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
49,313
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,313
 [2]
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 11 Apr 2023, 09:40
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KittyDoodles
Hi Experts,

Please can you explain QS 2. I was stuck between A and B.

Thanks
Kitty
Show more

Option a) "theory that the dual properties of quantum objects are complementary would be proven" is incorrect because the passage does not provide evidence or suggest that the theory of complementary properties of quantum objects would be proven if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously.

The passage mentions Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum theory, which argues that the wave-particle duality of quantum objects is not contradictory but rather complementary, and that the physical reality of a quantum object is determined before it is observed. However, the passage does not state that this theory would be proven or disproven based on the ability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously.

The passage primarily focuses on the debate between Bohr's interpretation and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which postulates that there are inherent limits to the precision with which certain properties of quantum objects can be known. The ability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously would have implications for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, as it would challenge the notion of inherent limits to measurement precision.

Therefore, option a) is not supported by the information provided in the passage, and the correct answer remains as b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted.

The correct answer is b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted.

The passage mentions Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which states that there is a fundamental limit to our ability to simultaneously measure certain complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object. Heisenberg argued that this uncertainty is inherent to the nature of quantum objects and not due to any limitations in measurement technology.

If scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously, it would contradict Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, which forms the basis of his interpretation of quantum theory. This would mean that the basic postulate of the uncertainty principle, which states that there are inherent limits to the precision with which certain properties of quantum objects can be known, would be refuted.

Therefore, the correct answer is b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted. This would have significant implications for our understanding of quantum theory and may require a reevaluation of the interpretations proposed by Heisenberg and other physicists.
avatar
Engineer1
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
656
Given Kudos: 457
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Booth (Chicago) (A$)
Schools: Booth (Chicago) (A$)
Posts: 201
Kudos: 656
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 11 Jan 2024, 18:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pragyakeshap
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave like waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic “interference” effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.

In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicists Niel Bohr argued that wave particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment.

Physicists Werner Heisenberg's “uncertainty principle”, by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.

1) Which of the following does the passage mention as providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects?

a) Scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously.
b) Scientists' inability to measure the momentum of the quantum objects with certainty.
c) The similarities in the appearance of particles and waves.
d) The tendency of quantum objects to exhibit well-defined trajectories only at either extremely high or extremely low speeds.
e) The behavior of quantum objects as either particles or waves depending on the type of experiment that is performed.


2) It can be inferred from the passage that if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously, then the

a) theory that the dual properties of quantum objects are complementary would be proven.
b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted
c) distinction between particle behavior would cease to exist
d) debate about quantum theory among physicists would be unchanged.
e) trajectories of quantum objects through space would be more difficult to predict.


3) All of the following are mentioned in the passage as possible characteristics of quantum objects except:

a) a minute size
b) momentum
c) position in space
d) sporadic movement
e) wave like behavior


4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?

a) The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
b) Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.
d) The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them


5. Q. The passage suggests that the debate among physicists mentioned in the first sentence has arisen in part because

A. the rapid movement of quantum objects poses an insurmountable obstacle to precise measurement
B. scientists have been unable to devise a single experiment that reveals both particle and wave properties of quantum objects simultaneously
C. the controversial nature of quantum theory has made it difficult for scientists to agree on what evidence is acceptable
D. division among physicists has resulted in the design of experiments that produce unintelligible experimental results
E. research efforts have been undermined by irreconcilable contradictions between equally compelling interpretations of quantum theory


6. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?

A. A thesis is introduced and then amended.
B. Arguments are presented, weighed, and then reconciled.
C. A problem is described and different interpretations intended to resolve the problem are presented.
D. Hypotheses are analyzed, their premises are refuted, and alternatives are suggested to replace the hypotheses.
E. A theory is advanced, opposing evidence is considered, and the theory is abandoned.


ID 00139
Show more



bb Bunuel Sajjad1994 This is a great GMAT prep passage. One small word in the second paragraph needs to be corrected. Can you please change it -

"... he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment."

Thank you!
avatar
Engineer1
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
656
Given Kudos: 457
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Booth (Chicago) (A$)
Schools: Booth (Chicago) (A$)
Posts: 201
Kudos: 656
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 11 Jan 2024, 18:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Harsh2111s
Quote:
4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?

a) The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
b) Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.
d) The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them.
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
I have doubt regarding option E.
Look at these lines from the passage
" he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment."
When physical reality is already determined before experiment then even though quantum objects posses distinct forms that doesn't depend on experiments, it will have no effect on physical reality.
Option E supports Bohr's conclusion.
Please explain what I missed.


You are ignoring the first part of this sentence:

Physicists Niel Bohr argued that wave particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment.

What he concludes is contrary to "an object exists in some determined form". He says the physical reality is determined before being observed. It may not stay the same once we observe it.

e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them
This is telling us that the object exists in some determined form. Bohr concluded against this. So this is against what Bohr says.
Show more

KarishmaB

The correct word in the second paragraph is "undetermined" in the actual GMAT Prep Passage. "... quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.". This is unfortunately incorrect in the passage pasted above. I could not get to the entire passage on GMAT prep yet because it is throwing me random passages. So, I came here to complete the passage altogether. Anyhow, it seems like C is wrong. Could you help me explain why? Thanks!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,376
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,376
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 12 Jan 2024, 00:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engineer1
pragyakeshap
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has nevertheless prompted debate among physicists. The debate arose because quantum theory addresses the peculiar properties of minute objects such as photons and electrons. While one type of experiment shows that these objects behave like particles, with well-defined trajectories through space, another demonstrates that, on the contrary, they behave like waves, their peaks and troughs producing characteristic “interference” effects. However, scientists have failed to devise an experiment to demonstrate both behaviors simultaneously.

In the 1920s, two alternate interpretations of quantum theory attempted to resolve this apparently contradictory wave-particle duality. Physicists Niel Bohr argued that wave particle properties are not contradictory, but complementary. Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually determined before the object is observed via experiment.

Physicists Werner Heisenberg's “uncertainty principle”, by contrast, postulated that we cannot precisely determine two complementary properties, such as position and momentum, of a quantum object simultaneously: if we measure an object's position with absolute certainty, then there is an infinite uncertainty in its momentum, and vice versa. He concluded that although we are limited in our ability to measure objects at the atomic and subatomic levels, their position and momentum are nonetheless defined all along.

1) Which of the following does the passage mention as providing evidence of the dual nature of quantum objects?

a) Scientists' inability to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects simultaneously.
b) Scientists' inability to measure the momentum of the quantum objects with certainty.
c) The similarities in the appearance of particles and waves.
d) The tendency of quantum objects to exhibit well-defined trajectories only at either extremely high or extremely low speeds.
e) The behavior of quantum objects as either particles or waves depending on the type of experiment that is performed.


2) It can be inferred from the passage that if scientists were able to measure the position and momentum of quantum objects precisely and simultaneously, then the

a) theory that the dual properties of quantum objects are complementary would be proven.
b) basic postulate of the uncertainty principle would be refuted
c) distinction between particle behavior would cease to exist
d) debate about quantum theory among physicists would be unchanged.
e) trajectories of quantum objects through space would be more difficult to predict.


3) All of the following are mentioned in the passage as possible characteristics of quantum objects except:

a) a minute size
b) momentum
c) position in space
d) sporadic movement
e) wave like behavior


4) Which of the following, if true, would most seriously undermine Bohr's conclusion about the physical reality of a quantum object?

a) The physical properties of particles and waves are inherently complementary.
b) Human intuition is not a factor in the interpretation of scientific data about quantum objects.
c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.
d) The technology used in research on quantum objects has made tremendous advances since the 1920s.
e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them


5. Q. The passage suggests that the debate among physicists mentioned in the first sentence has arisen in part because

A. the rapid movement of quantum objects poses an insurmountable obstacle to precise measurement
B. scientists have been unable to devise a single experiment that reveals both particle and wave properties of quantum objects simultaneously
C. the controversial nature of quantum theory has made it difficult for scientists to agree on what evidence is acceptable
D. division among physicists has resulted in the design of experiments that produce unintelligible experimental results
E. research efforts have been undermined by irreconcilable contradictions between equally compelling interpretations of quantum theory


6. Which of the following best describes the organization of the passage?

A. A thesis is introduced and then amended.
B. Arguments are presented, weighed, and then reconciled.
C. A problem is described and different interpretations intended to resolve the problem are presented.
D. Hypotheses are analyzed, their premises are refuted, and alternatives are suggested to replace the hypotheses.
E. A theory is advanced, opposing evidence is considered, and the theory is abandoned.


ID 00139



bb Bunuel Sajjad1994 This is a great GMAT prep passage. One small word in the second paragraph needs to be corrected. Can you please change it -

"... he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment."

Thank you!
Show more
_____________________
Fixed the typo. Thank you!
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
77,001
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 77,001
 [3]
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 12 Jan 2024, 02:08
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Engineer1

KarishmaB

The correct word in the second paragraph is "undetermined" in the actual GMAT Prep Passage. "... quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.". This is unfortunately incorrect in the passage pasted above. I could not get to the entire passage on GMAT prep yet because it is throwing me random passages. So, I came here to complete the passage altogether. Anyhow, it seems like C is wrong. Could you help me explain why? Thanks!
Show more

Well, that just makes it better and cleaner then. The answer is still in the same part of the same sentence,

Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.

Our intuition says that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it. Bohr concluded against this intuition. This means that he says that an object does not exist in some determined form. There is no confusion here about 'before the experiment', 'during the experiment' or 'after the experiment.' With the changed wording, we are now given that he says that physical reality is undetermined before the object is observed so basically its all undetermined and we don't have to worry about the experiment.

e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them.

This is opposite of what Bohr said and hence it undermines Bohr's conclusion.

c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.

"Expectations of the experiments" is not a concept discussed in the passage. Hence, I do not know how to evaluate this. So it can't be the answer. After all, I am not required to know Quantum theory to be able to answer the RC questions. I only have to pick info from the passage.

Hence (E) makes sense.
avatar
Engineer1
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Last visit: 15 Jun 2025
Posts: 201
Own Kudos:
656
Given Kudos: 457
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: Booth (Chicago) (A$)
Schools: Booth (Chicago) (A$)
Posts: 201
Kudos: 656
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 12 Jan 2024, 11:43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
Engineer1

KarishmaB

The correct word in the second paragraph is "undetermined" in the actual GMAT Prep Passage. "... quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.". This is unfortunately incorrect in the passage pasted above. I could not get to the entire passage on GMAT prep yet because it is throwing me random passages. So, I came here to complete the passage altogether. Anyhow, it seems like C is wrong. Could you help me explain why? Thanks!

Well, that just makes it better and cleaner then. The answer is still in the same part of the same sentence,

Contrary to our intuition that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it, he concluded that the physical reality of a quantum objects is actually undetermined before the object is observed via experiment.

Our intuition says that an object continues to exist in some determined form even though we cannot perceive it. Bohr concluded against this intuition. This means that he says that an object does not exist in some determined form. There is no confusion here about 'before the experiment', 'during the experiment' or 'after the experiment.' With the changed wording, we are now given that he says that physical reality is undetermined before the object is observed so basically its all undetermined and we don't have to worry about the experiment.

e) Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms that do not depend on the experiments used to measure them.

This is opposite of what Bohr said and hence it undermines Bohr's conclusion.

c) Results of experiments on quantum objects are sometime influenced by the expectations of the experiments.

"Expectations of the experiments" is not a concept discussed in the passage. Hence, I do not know how to evaluate this. So it can't be the answer. After all, I am not required to know Quantum theory to be able to answer the RC questions. I only have to pick info from the passage.

Hence (E) makes sense.
Show more

Yeah I see now. Basically, the answer choice should say something that refutes Neil Bohr's reasoning and strengthens our intuition that an object actually exists in determined form.
"..Quantum objects posses distinct, continuously existing physical forms."

On the other hand, I was thinking that before an experiment, we might expect an object proven to be in certain form as the outcome of experiment. The passage does not talk about what our expectations from experiment are. Thanks.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,830
Own Kudos:
986
Posts: 18,830
Kudos: 986
Quantum Theory, although of tremendous scientific value, has neverthel 12 Apr 2025, 18:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
Sajjad1994
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
miag
189 posts