Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:04 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
anonymousegmat
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
anonymousegmat
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Kumbaya
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Last visit: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Posts: 56
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Short answer: No.

Long answer: No. Each school evaluates what you did for the school, while you were at that school.
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anonymousegmat
Praetorian
anonymousegmat
I have a question about the tenure process.

Say as a PhD I publish a paper or two. After I graduate I get a good non TT job at a state university. I manage to publish another paper or two and in a few years I land a TT job somewhere else. Do the papers I have published while at other Universities count towards fulfilling my tenure requirements? Or do they only consider journal output that happens while I am employed by them (and their name is attached to it)

just curious.

The tenure clock starts afresh anytime you are hired as an assistant professor.

The only time you will be hired into a non tenure track position is when you a clinical or adjunct. In either case, you may be offered a rolling contract of 3-6 years. As a clinical or adjunct, you will swamped with teaching responsibilities and I doubt you will have anytime to do anything else.

The fact that you start your career in a non tenure track position sends out confusing and perhaps wrong signals to any research school. You may have personal reasons to do so, but it does not bode well for a career in research. Further, you say that you will continue publishing while you are in a non tenure track position. This seems ambitious. In a non tenure track position, you will have no monetary or professional incentive to publish or work on research. It is possible and i am sure it has been done, but the odds are very much against you. Making the switch from a non tenure track position to a tenure track position is possible, but very difficult.

You are asking good questions. I would encourage you to start with what you really want to do with your PhD. Fix the problem at its source. If you say teaching, there are easier ways to get your PhD. If you want research, the plot will thicken further. Then you have to look at what kind of research you are interested in. Once you have made that decision, then you look for the professors who work with the kind of stuff you are interested in. So on and So forth...

Hope this helps

i am not worried about TT vs. NonTT posistions, teaching vs. research..
let me rephrase the question better.. say you land a TT position somewhere... publish some stuff, find out you don't like the Uni, land a TT somewhere else. do your publications follow you and count toward tenure requirements elsewhere, or do universities only count publication output that happens while you work for them.


No, if you move to another school at the same rank, you start over with your tenure clock. Unless you are hired into another university as an associate professor with tenure, the 6 year clock starts over at all research schools. Sometimes you can negotiate a shorter time frame, but this is not too common.
avatar
bauble
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Last visit: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Posts: 76
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
No, if you move to another school at the same rank, you start over with your tenure clock. Unless you are hired into another university as an associate professor with tenure, the 6 year clock starts over at all research schools. Sometimes you can negotiate a shorter time frame, but this is not too common.


You sure about that? I know a prof (fairly prominent) who got tenure in a 2-3 years after moving to a new school. Maybe he was one of the rare ones.

The job market for mid-level faculty is pretty strong, so it would not surprise me to see people who are "good," not necessarily a "superstar" per se (e.g. making fairly decent strides in research/teaching) at a uni attracting strong interest from other schools, and I'm guessing that they'd offer commensurate credit for prior service to attract them.
avatar
cabro57
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Last visit: 14 Jun 2016
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 195
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bauble
You sure about that? I know a prof (fairly prominent) who got tenure in a 2-3 years after moving to a new school. Maybe he was one of the rare ones.

The job market for mid-level faculty is pretty strong, so it would not surprise me to see people who are "good," not necessarily a "superstar" per se (e.g. making fairly decent strides in research/teaching) at a uni attracting strong interest from other schools, and I'm guessing that they'd offer commensurate credit for prior service to attract them.


Some schools are very strict about the tenure clock, some schools aren't. Some only include the very recent work that you've done in making tenure decisions, some will look at the impact you've had and the citations you've gotten, no matter when you published the paper. I'd be very careful in making such generalizations about tenure decisions as these policies are notoriously secretive.

In all honesty, if anyone's either at the PhD application/PhD program stage and not on the job market, I think that thinking about tenure decisions is largely counterproductive. I mean, it's not like it's what you should worry about just now.
avatar
bauble
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Last visit: 01 Jul 2008
Posts: 76
Own Kudos:
Posts: 76
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
In all honesty, if anyone's either at the PhD application/PhD program stage and not on the job market, I think that thinking about tenure decisions is largely counterproductive. I mean, it's not like it's what you should worry about just now.


Worrying about job-hopping while TT is a bit fatalistic. However, I do think that it is worth thinking about your first job all through the Ph.D. program. There are co-authored papers that will help tremendously in getting a good first job, and then there is the dissertation stream of research that can, ideally, enhance publication productivity during TT years.
User avatar
anonymousegmat
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cabro57
bauble
You sure about that? I know a prof (fairly prominent) who got tenure in a 2-3 years after moving to a new school. Maybe he was one of the rare ones.

The job market for mid-level faculty is pretty strong, so it would not surprise me to see people who are "good," not necessarily a "superstar" per se (e.g. making fairly decent strides in research/teaching) at a uni attracting strong interest from other schools, and I'm guessing that they'd offer commensurate credit for prior service to attract them.

Some schools are very strict about the tenure clock, some schools aren't. Some only include the very recent work that you've done in making tenure decisions, some will look at the impact you've had and the citations you've gotten, no matter when you published the paper. I'd be very careful in making such generalizations about tenure decisions as these policies are notoriously secretive.

In all honesty, if anyone's either at the PhD application/PhD program stage and not on the job market, I think that thinking about tenure decisions is largely counterproductive. I mean, it's not like it's what you should worry about just now.


i agree - i am a year or two away from even applying. i just want to know everything i can about what i am going to do for the rest fo my life :o)
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bauble
Quote:
No, if you move to another school at the same rank, you start over with your tenure clock. Unless you are hired into another university as an associate professor with tenure, the 6 year clock starts over at all research schools. Sometimes you can negotiate a shorter time frame, but this is not too common.

You sure about that? I know a prof (fairly prominent) who got tenure in a 2-3 years after moving to a new school. Maybe he was one of the rare ones.

The job market for mid-level faculty is pretty strong, so it would not surprise me to see people who are "good," not necessarily a "superstar" per se (e.g. making fairly decent strides in research/teaching) at a uni attracting strong interest from other schools, and I'm guessing that they'd offer commensurate credit for prior service to attract them.


bauble

Thats what I meant when I said that sometimes you can negotiate a shorter time frame, but it is not too common. Yes, this is possible and I am pretty sure that there are several such exceptions to the rule. If you come into a program with a good reputation , you can cut some sort of a deal for less than 6 years. Its not too common, but it is definitely possible. Such exceptions are tempting data that reinforces what we all want...a little flexibility, but we should safely assume a 6 year clock.

I would not make any assumptions at all. There is no harm in knowing what's possible, but we should not let it be a distraction.
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bauble
Quote:
In all honesty, if anyone's either at the PhD application/PhD program stage and not on the job market, I think that thinking about tenure decisions is largely counterproductive. I mean, it's not like it's what you should worry about just now.

Worrying about job-hopping while TT is a bit fatalistic. However, I do think that it is worth thinking about your first job all through the Ph.D. program. There are co-authored papers that will help tremendously in getting a good first job, and then there is the dissertation stream of research that can, ideally, enhance publication productivity during TT years.


Both of you make very strong points. I would not let tenure decisions worry me at all.

I would focus on a good strong dissertation topic that will generate research not only straight out of my Ph.D, but through my tenure track years as well.

It is absolutely imperative to understand the game well. Discussing such topics with faculty and your peers is extremely important.
Moderator:
PhD Forum Moderator
65 posts