Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
15 Mar 2005, 11:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
hi guys,
here this one out:
-> These days, remembering is all the rage in Seoul. Last week President Roh Moo Hyun's administration agreed to the release of several classified documents that cast a harsh new light on past government deeds, particularily those of the Park Chng Hee presidency between 1961 and 1979. The move came just days after Roh's Uri Party passed a bill to set up a commission that will soon be scrutinizing "anti-national acts" committed by Koreans who collaborated with Japanese occupiers between 1910 and 1945.
Q1: Explain the passage?
Q2: What can be inferred from it?
Q3: What can strengthen it?
Q4: How can it be weakened?
Q5: What is assummed over here?
PS: got this passage from the article: "KOREA The Truth Hurts by Christian Carl and B.J.Lee" from Newsweek January 2005 Edition.
here this one out:
-> These days, remembering is all the rage in Seoul. Last week President Roh Moo Hyun's administration agreed to the release of several classified documents that cast a harsh new light on past government deeds, particularily those of the Park Chng Hee presidency between 1961 and 1979. The move came just days after Roh's Uri Party passed a bill to set up a commission that will soon be scrutinizing "anti-national acts" committed by Koreans who collaborated with Japanese occupiers between 1910 and 1945.
Q1: Explain the passage?
Q2: What can be inferred from it?
Q3: What can strengthen it?
Q4: How can it be weakened?
Q5: What is assummed over here?
PS: got this passage from the article: "KOREA The Truth Hurts by Christian Carl and B.J.Lee" from Newsweek January 2005 Edition.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
16 Mar 2005, 07:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
cmon guys...anybody...please reply
16 Mar 2005, 12:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
Q1: Explain the passage?
It says lately the main theme in Seoul is to remember. First there was this bill that set up a commission to look at the past deeds of Koreans in 1910 to 1945, then there is this release of classified documents that makes people to remember what PCH did in 1961 to 1979.
Q2: What can be inferred from it?
Not much. All I can get is that PCH may have done something not very good in his presidency.
Q3: What can strengthen it?
Strengthen what? It is a description of different facts rather than an argument. If we say the conclusion is that these days the main theme is to remember. Then another example that has the same theme, ie. talks about the past, would strengthen the conclusion.
Q4: How can it be weakened?
If we say that nobody really paid any attention to these two events, rather everybody was talking about the World Cup or something else, then the conclusion about the theme of remembering would be weakened.
Q5: What is assummed over here?
I don't think the author has used any assumptions.
It says lately the main theme in Seoul is to remember. First there was this bill that set up a commission to look at the past deeds of Koreans in 1910 to 1945, then there is this release of classified documents that makes people to remember what PCH did in 1961 to 1979.
Q2: What can be inferred from it?
Not much. All I can get is that PCH may have done something not very good in his presidency.
Q3: What can strengthen it?
Strengthen what? It is a description of different facts rather than an argument. If we say the conclusion is that these days the main theme is to remember. Then another example that has the same theme, ie. talks about the past, would strengthen the conclusion.
Q4: How can it be weakened?
If we say that nobody really paid any attention to these two events, rather everybody was talking about the World Cup or something else, then the conclusion about the theme of remembering would be weakened.
Q5: What is assummed over here?
I don't think the author has used any assumptions.
