Last visit was: 12 Oct 2024, 19:18 It is currently 12 Oct 2024, 19:18
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 14038
Own Kudos [?]: 39856 [9]
Given Kudos: 5867
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 7083
Own Kudos [?]: 65399 [0]
Given Kudos: 1844
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
General Discussion
Joined: 05 Jan 2018
Posts: 20
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [1]
Given Kudos: 167
Send PM
Joined: 27 Jun 2020
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
1
Kudos
skhemani
Could anyone explain Q6 - how can we arrive at answer C ?

It is mentioned that we don’t have the luxury of unlimited natural resources, no can we assume that whatever we produce as a waste, can be absorbed by the nature.
Thus, we have to make sure that we don’t grow beyond the nature can absorb our wastes. Hence, a noneconomic constraint.

Posted from my mobile device
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [3]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V32
GRE 1: Q155 V145
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Question-1
The phrase that really jumps out to me in C is "even if such strategies lead temporarily to economic stagnation." Stagnation is what the neoclassical economists think will happen if we check economic growth. In response, the steady-state economists argue that "alternatives to growth can still accomplish what is required of any economy: the satisfaction of human wants." That response doesn't accept that stagnation, temporary or not, may occur. Instead, it redirects to the idea of the real goal of the economy - the satisfaction of human wants.

Another, more subtle reason to be skeptical of C is the phrase "by adopting conservation strategies." Conservation is an example of one alternative to growth. But there could be others. That makes C a bit too narrow.

If you compare C to D, you'll notice that D redirects to the satisfaction of human wants, whereas C stays on stagnation. You'll also notice that D presents conservation as one alternative to growth (alternatives like conservation") without narrowing the scope too much.

Comparing the correct answer to a similar-but wrong answer is a great exercise for review.

Comparing two similar answers, spotting the differences, and then looking at the passage with those differences in mind is a great way to choose between two good-looking answer choices on test day.
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V32
GRE 1: Q155 V145
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
Q-2
The wording on this one is tricky. We want something that the neoclassical economists and the steady-state economists AGREE on. Blahsheep nailed it with the line reference: lines 30-36 tell us that the neoclassicists do acknowledge that the environment can be depleted. Steady-state economists definitely believe this, which is why they are so into conservation. As for the others:

(A) is correct because limited environmental resources is something steady-state economists believe in (Line 20) and neoclassical economists wouldn't disagree with. According to Lines 30-36, neoclassical economists believe that natural resources, "if depleted, can be replaced by other elements." So they can acknowledge that these resources can be limited ("if depleted"), but they ultimately believe it's not a big obstacle (since other elements, like human-made resources) can replace natural resources.
(B) is something the neoclassicists would not agree with. See line 7, they do not believe there are any economic constraints.

(C) Again, they would not agree. See line 45 and line 36: they believe in unlimited growth.

(D) see same lines.

(E) see same lines.

Originally posted by thouhid on 20 Dec 2020, 10:43.
Last edited by thouhid on 20 Dec 2020, 10:47, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [1]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V32
GRE 1: Q155 V145
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Question-3
The answer was "almost verbatim"
That's something we expect more out of questions that say
"according to the passage / the passage cites / the passage states"

It's useful to remember that these question stems usually lead to easier to verify answers.

The question stem wordings that make us think, "This answer will be a hard-to-decipher rewording of something we know from the passage" are
inferred, implies, suggests, most likely to agree

Both times "I didn't look back to the passage"
This might be the most important thing you could change to affect your RC accuracy!

I spend most of my time teaching RC trying to get students to do more thinking / researching / prephrasing before they look at answer choices.

For most of these question stems, there are keywords in there that allow you to find the "Proof Window": the sentence or sentences from the passage that this question is testing.

I would see the keywords on Q3 of "steady-state economists ... unlimited economic growth ... dangerous ... because"

In lines 26-28, I see a match for these keywords:
"Steady-state economists thus believe that ... an ever growing economy is dangerous".

I *know* that I'm looking at the right spot, because of the tight correspondence between question stem keywords and passage wording.

We were asked to look for WHY they find it dangerous. Since this sentence say "they THUS believe that it's dangerous", I know that the preceding sentence must be where the reason WHY is located.

Looking at line 21-26, it looks like they're saying "if we kept growing beyond the optimal size, it would increase the cost to the environment faster that it would benefit us, and we would generate cycles that impoverish rather than enrich".

ANSWERS
(A) there was nothing in that Proof Window about "replacing" one resource with another
(B) nothing in that Window about "converting into products faster other stuff can compensate for"
(C) nothing in that Window about "generating new markets"
(D) nothing in that Window about "income inequities and capital needed to fix them"
(E) Yup.

If you're thinking to yourself, "Who has time to look back on every question?!"
1. That's fair ... many/most people don't have time to finish all of RC
2. This method doesn't necessarily take more time; it just allocates time differently. By always finding the Proof Window in the passage and re-reading it before I look at answers, I spend way less time on the answer choices. I'm not tossing and turning, agonizing over which answer feels better than another. I have pretty quick, black-and-white reactions to the answers, because I know the test can only be testing me on the Proof Sentence they pointed me to.

Hope this helps.
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V32
GRE 1: Q155 V145
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
Q-5
The index of environmentally sustainable growth is a warning sign that our actual growth is environmentally sustainable. Although this warning sign is suggesting to us that we've exceeded our limits, the index itself is just a measurement tool, a warning sign, not a limit.

The keyword in the question stem is "noneconomic constraint".

Whichever answer choice we pick needs to come from a line reference that includes "noneconomic constraint" or some equivalent paraphrase.

From line 7-8, we see "no noneconomic constraints" and "no limits on growth" going hand in hand.

And then in line 19-26, we see "nature's limited capacity to regenerate raw material and absorb waste suggests ... that growth beyond this ideal point would ... impoverish rather than enrich".

Line 7-8 vs. line 19-26 is the essence of the debate between Neoclassical (no limits) and Steady State (oh, there are limits, my friend).

So we can support (C) because the capacity of nature to absorb waste is a LIMIT on growth, and SS believes that finite environmental resources are EXTERNAL to an economic system, not internal.


== incorrect answers ==

(A) this is an economic constraint ... in lines 48-49 we see that both Neo and SS agree that this is a required goal an economy must meet.

(B) this is economic (it factors in production costs) and is NOT a constraint ... it's just a measurement tool that SS sees as a warning that we've exceeded our budget.

(D) Do problems associated with economic growth LIMIT economic growth? i.e., are they a constraint? There's not a good line reference in the passage for saying so, but it seems reasonable to think that the problems that arise with growth might limit growth. However, those problems would be an economic constraint, because they are a direct consequence of economic growth.

(E) You could shoot this down in a similar manner to how we eliminated (D). However, the easier way to get rid of this answer is to remember that this phrase came out of the mouths of Neo's ... this question is from the viewpoint of SS. So this reeks of "wrong point of view".
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V32
GRE 1: Q155 V145
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
Q-7
Remind myself of the Passage Map

2. See if the first sentence (the transition sentence) of the paragraph we're being asked about gives a decent summary of what that paragraph is trying to do.

====

1. What was each paragraph good for?

P1 - introduced the two sides to the scale and described what Neoclassical is all about

P2 - described what Steady State is all about

P3 - present a little back and forth debate between the two about exceeding our equilibrium and slowing down / putting a cap on growth.

2. Is the transition sentence helpful?
In this case, not really. It's really long and we only really get its function as we read the rest of the paragraph.

So, approaching the answers, I want something to the effect of
"Last paragraph has a claim by SS that we've exceeded the limit and should stop growing, a rebuttal by Neo, and then a counter-rebuttal by SS."

(A) "contradicts" is way too strong and unsupported

(B) "illustrates the weakness" is way too opinionated and unsupported (the author never really chooses a favorite, but implicitly the author seems to favor SS, the new school)

(C) again, this makes the author seem like he favors Neo, but there's no support for that in the passage.

The easiest way to tell (D) and (E) apart is their common denominator: "the basic goal an economy must meet".

Is there something like that in the last paragraph?
Yes, lines 48-49 "the satisfaction of human wants"

(D) is saying that Neo thinks SS will ruin that goal, but SS identifies an additional way to achieve the goal.

(E) is saying that Neo and SS have differing views on the basic goal an economy must meet. That seems to be contradicted by lines 44-49.

Both SS and Neo agree that "what is required of any economy" is the satisfaction of human wants.

Neo argues that if we limit/halt growth, we'll no longer be able to satisfy human wants. SS replies that if we turn our focus to conservation, we can get more out of what we have "without sacrificing the ability to satisfy the wants of producers and consumers" (last sentence).

Hope this helps.
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Location: Bangladesh
GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V32
GRE 1: Q155 V145
GPA: 3.85
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
Q-8
Neoclassical - unlimited growth, use human resources when natural are depleted, problems are best cured by growth
steady-state - limited resources, limited growth, optimal growth is sustainable

Answer choice (B) is supported in lines 30-35.

Incorrect answers
(A) is contradicted in lines 30-35.
(C) is unsupported. It's the steady-state economists who hold this belief.
(D) is unsupported. Steady-state economists point to this, but is not addressed by neoclassical economists.
(E) is unsupported. Which resource is more preferable is not indicated.
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Posts: 82
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 131
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
In Q1...Option choice A and B are factually correct but does it not encapsulate the entire main point of the passage like it missed the last para part?
In Q2 Option choice D,, does Neo classical oppose the view that Western economies have exceeded the optimal size? I dont think they have explicitly stated the same. Please help with the same.
In Q 6..Please explain Option A and B

GMATNinja VeritasKarishma
Joined: 27 Sep 2020
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 52
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
HI VeritasKarishma,
Can you help me with question 7 , see new I do not see in third paragraph where it notes an objection to implementing the policies of the new economic school. I can that it identifies an additional policy , but I don't see objection to new school policies i.e. steady state economics. They just point that Western economies have already reached optimal value (No objection here).
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15361
Own Kudos [?]: 68724 [1]
Given Kudos: 444
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Gaurav2896
HI VeritasKarishma,
Can you help me with question 7 , see new I do not see in third paragraph where it notes an objection to implementing the policies of the new economic school. I can that it identifies an additional policy , but I don't see objection to new school policies i.e. steady state economics. They just point that Western economies have already reached optimal value (No objection here).


"(D) It notes an objection to implementing the policies of the new economic school and identifies an additional policy that can help avoid that objection and still meet the goal an economy must meet."

an objection to implementing the policies of the new economic school is:

...In response
(45) to the warnings from neoclassical economists that
checking economic growth only leads to economic
stagnation
...


identifies an additional policy that can help avoid that objection and still meet the goal an economy must meet:

...they argue that there are alternatives to
growth that still accomplish what is required of any
economy: the satisfaction of human wants. One of
(50) the alternatives is conservation...


(D) is correct.
Joined: 07 Jan 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
WE:Account Management (Accounting)
Send PM
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
Can anyone post an explanation for Question 4?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Recently, a new school of economics called steady state economics has [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7083 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14038 posts