Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 1612:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
You’re first to know: Save $200 on GMAT prep starting tomorrow, 4/13. Get 6 official practice tests and study with real questions. Be ready to save!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
14 Mar 2023, 06:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
egmat EducationAisle GMATNinja I am not clear why the following //ism cannot be correct ? Pls point out the logical / grammmatical flaws if any
• Researchers have found (C-1)
o that
• individuals (C-2)
o who have been blind from birth, (C-3)
o and who thus have never seen anyone gesture, (C-4)
• nevertheless
• make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as (C-2 continued...) sighted people do, (C-5)
• and will gesture even when conversing with another blind person. (C-2 continued
So basically why cant //ism be b/w make hand motions and will gesture when conversing with another blind person
Thus researchers have one finding which includes two things. Hence why are we forcing 'that'? I mean if above meaning is acceptable, then going without 'that' should be fine .
Also why do we require //ism with 'as well as'? Are we not required //ism with 'as well as' since it is not a // marker
• Researchers have found (C-1)
o that
• individuals (C-2)
o who have been blind from birth, (C-3)
o and who thus have never seen anyone gesture, (C-4)
• nevertheless
• make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as (C-2 continued...) sighted people do, (C-5)
• and will gesture even when conversing with another blind person. (C-2 continued
So basically why cant //ism be b/w make hand motions and will gesture when conversing with another blind person
Thus researchers have one finding which includes two things. Hence why are we forcing 'that'? I mean if above meaning is acceptable, then going without 'that' should be fine .
Also why do we require //ism with 'as well as'? Are we not required //ism with 'as well as' since it is not a // marker
15 Mar 2023, 05:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Elite097
The sentence is forcing "that", to make sure that the sentence is not interpreted, the way you are interpreting
So, researchers have found two things:
1) that individuals who have been blind from birth, and who thus have never seen anyone gesture, nevertheless make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as sighted people do
2) that they will gesture even when conversing with another blind person
Parallelism between that and that ensures that this is the only meaning interpretation. Since this meaning is logical, we will stick to it.
Moderators:
