Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
14 Mar 2023, 06:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
egmat EducationAisle GMATNinja I am not clear why the following //ism cannot be correct ? Pls point out the logical / grammmatical flaws if any
• Researchers have found (C-1)
o that
• individuals (C-2)
o who have been blind from birth, (C-3)
o and who thus have never seen anyone gesture, (C-4)
• nevertheless
• make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as (C-2 continued...) sighted people do, (C-5)
• and will gesture even when conversing with another blind person. (C-2 continued
So basically why cant //ism be b/w make hand motions and will gesture when conversing with another blind person
Thus researchers have one finding which includes two things. Hence why are we forcing 'that'? I mean if above meaning is acceptable, then going without 'that' should be fine .
Also why do we require //ism with 'as well as'? Are we not required //ism with 'as well as' since it is not a // marker
• Researchers have found (C-1)
o that
• individuals (C-2)
o who have been blind from birth, (C-3)
o and who thus have never seen anyone gesture, (C-4)
• nevertheless
• make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as (C-2 continued...) sighted people do, (C-5)
• and will gesture even when conversing with another blind person. (C-2 continued
So basically why cant //ism be b/w make hand motions and will gesture when conversing with another blind person
Thus researchers have one finding which includes two things. Hence why are we forcing 'that'? I mean if above meaning is acceptable, then going without 'that' should be fine .
Also why do we require //ism with 'as well as'? Are we not required //ism with 'as well as' since it is not a // marker
15 Mar 2023, 05:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
Elite097
The sentence is forcing "that", to make sure that the sentence is not interpreted, the way you are interpreting
So, researchers have found two things:
1) that individuals who have been blind from birth, and who thus have never seen anyone gesture, nevertheless make hand motions when speaking just as frequently and in virtually the same way as sighted people do
2) that they will gesture even when conversing with another blind person
Parallelism between that and that ensures that this is the only meaning interpretation. Since this meaning is logical, we will stick to it.
Moderators:
189 posts
