Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
The oil wells of Barlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Barlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.
The program instituted by the government of Barlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?
a) Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.
b) Oil production in countries other than Barlandia declined in the same year that Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.
c) In the first quarter after Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.
d) Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.
e) Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The oil wells of Barlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Barlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.
The program instituted by the government of Barlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?
a) Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.
b) Oil production in countries other than Barlandia declined in the same year that Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.
c) In the first quarter after Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.
d) Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.
e) Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.
The oil wells of Barlandia produced so much oil that the market was overwhelmed; consumption did not keep pace with production. As a result, oil prices fell. The government of Barlandia attempted to support oil prices through a subsidy scheme: oil producers who voluntarily limited the amount of oil they produced were compensated directly by the government up to a specified maximum payment.
The program instituted by the government of Barlandia, if successful, will not be a net cost to the government. Which of the following, if true, is the best basis for an explanation of how this could be true?
a) Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.
b) Oil production in countries other than Barlandia declined in the same year that Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme.
c) In the first quarter after Barlandia's government instituted the compensatory scheme, oil production declined 8 percent.
d) Because the government specified a maximum subsidy payment per oil producer, those producers with numerous wells in production received less support per well than those producers with fewer wells in production.
e) Oil producers desiring to qualify for the compensatory scheme could not continue to produce oil and simply withhold it from the market.
Show more
Clear A.
The argument is talking about government "net cost". If you look at the question, the answer should be that the government would have somehow get replacement for the money they spend.
In A, the government will get money back because they will get the tax from the oil producer's income.
If government pays fixed amount to everyone than oilproducers with many oil wells is going to recieve less amount irrespective of their production capacity. So that tax will be less than whatever ideally the tax should have been generated,
Sorry to pull out this old post. Please help me to understand how OA is correct.
I am not very clear of the question(will not be a net cost to the government). Does this mean that if the program is successful, it will not have any additional cost burden to the Government?.
Choice A: Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.
==>My understanding of this choice is that less tax is paid to the Government so this will result in additional cost burden to the Government. Then how come this choice is correct. Government gives compensation to the company but still less tax is paid to govt. by the company, so there is an overall loss for the Government.
Sorry to pull out this old post. Please help me to understand how OA is correct.
I am not very clear of the question(will not be a net cost to the government). Does this mean that if the program is successful, it will not have any additional cost burden to the Government?.
Choice A: Depressed oil prices meant operating losses for oil producers, decreasing the income of oil producers, and thus decreasing the taxes paid to the government by oil producers.
==>My understanding of this choice is that less tax is paid to the Government so this will result in additional cost burden to the Government. Then how come this choice is correct. Government gives compensation to the company but still less tax is paid to govt. by the company, so there is an overall loss for the Government.
Thanks, Gabriel
Show more
Here is my understanding. I think A is correct answer. Imagine initial scenario. High production--> low prices--> less tax. Govt losing money. Govt pays money to reduce production--> lower production-->higher prices--> higher taxes. Govt can make some money it paid compared to initial scenario. So it is possible govt. paid X amount and money and recovered all of it -->zero net cost to it. Answer = A.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.