shivangishar
SajjadAhmadPlease provide explanation for Q3. Why is the answer B, not A?
Passage :Revelations made by journalist Vance Packard in his “The Naked Society” on the incredibly enormous amounts of private information being gathered by government databases
created an uproar over data privacy
for the first time in 1964.
How can this mean that people were not aware about what the government was doing? Probably they were aware but there was nothing strong enough to cause the mass hysteria?
If you see Option A :
The Naked Society” was hailed as a rebellious piece of work which caused an uproar.
This option clearly tells us that a particular piece of work caused the uproar.
For example : People in India were against Britishers but the revolt of 1857 caused the uproar. This cannot mean that people were not aware of the torture done by Britishers, right?
Let me answer your query. But before I go into the specifics, B is by far the better answer choice, it is not even close. So there are major issues with A, which I will try to explain.
First the question is an "inference" question. This means you need to infer something which is not obviously stated in the paragraph. Secondly, you have to infer this information from the first paragraph only. Now we understood what the question asked, let us proceed.
A. "The Naked Society” was hailed as a
rebellious piece of work which caused an uproar.
Can we infer that this piece was "rebellious"? No. Why does it have to be rebellious, in fact from the information provided we just know that it uncovered dirty secrets of the US government.
Secondly, The Naked Society definitely created an uproar. it is clearly mentioned here -
"Revelations made by journalist Vance Packard in his “The Naked Society” on the incredibly enormous amounts of private information being gathered by government databases created an uproar over data privacy for the first time in 1964."So this is pretty much stated. Do we have to infer this information? No. But the questions asks you to infer a piece of information which the author has not explicitly stated.
Now let us look at B.
B. People were probably unaware of the kind of data the government and corporates were gathering on them prior to the early 1960s.Were people unaware? Yes it can be reasonably inferred they were not aware. Otherwise why would there be an uproar?
Also this is further strengthened by the first word of the paragraph "Revelations". This word means that the Vance Packard actually revealed something which was unknown to the common public.
Does it all make sense?