Last visit was: 20 May 2025, 12:38 It is currently 20 May 2025, 12:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 101,571
Own Kudos:
725,795
 [1]
Given Kudos: 93,572
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,571
Kudos: 725,795
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Dereno
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 284
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 350
Products:
Posts: 284
Kudos: 261
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 735
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 184
Products:
Posts: 735
Kudos: 428
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed.

It fails to consider birth years like 2000 --> 2009, 1976 --> 1985, 1944 --> 1953, etc.

A. The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes. Not True

B. The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it. Not True, the example does echibit the principle discussed

C. The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit. This is the case. Those are the only cases, where the above generalisation works

D. The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed. Doesn't make sense

E. The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five. Doesn't work for 1976, not true
Bunuel
Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed.

Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?

A. The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.

B. The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.

C. The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.

D. The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed.

E. The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.


This is a CR Butler Question

Check the links to other Butler Projects:


­
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 101,571
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93,572
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 101,571
Kudos: 725,795
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Roberta was born in 1967, and so in 1976 she was nine years old. It is clear from this example that the last two digits of a person’s birth year will be the same as the last two digits of the year of that person’s ninth birthday, except that the position of the digits will be reversed.

Which of the following is the best criticism of the assertions made?

A. The generalization is valid only for those birth years that do not end in two zeroes.

B. The example does not exhibit the same principle as is expressed in the generalization based on it.

C. The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is one greater than the second-to-last digit.

D. The example cannot be shown to be correct unless the truth of the generalization is already presupposed.

E. The generalization is valid only for those birth years in which the last digit is greater than five.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The generalization is only true for some birth years. A good criticism of the generalization would show when the generalization is not true. C does just that and thus is the correct answer.

A is incorrect. It is false that the generalization holds for all years that do not end in two zeros. For example, 1970 is a birth year that does not end in two zeros. However, 1970 plus nine equals 1979, and hence this is a case for which the generalization is not valid. Since this answer choice is false, it cannot be a good criticism of the assertions.

The second answer choice is also incorrect. In the example, the last two digits of the person’s birth year-67-are the same as the last two digits of the year of the person’s ninth birthday-76-except reversed. Thus, the example does in fact exhibit the same principle as the generalization.

The fourth answer choice is incorrect. The difference between 1976 and 1967 is nine. The correctness of the first statement depends only on this fact and the fact that Roberta was born in 1967 and was still alive in 1976. Thus, the truth of the generalization is not presupposed.

The last answer choice is also incorrect. Consider birth year 1923. a person born in 1923 would have been nine in 1932 and the generalization holds. So E is false.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7307 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts